GNU bug report logs - #16646
24.3.50; lisp-completion-at-point suggests unbound symbols

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>

Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 03:56:01 UTC

Severity: minor

Found in version 24.3.50

Done: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>
Subject: bug#16646: closed (Re: bug#16646: 24.3.50; lisp-completion-at-point
 suggests unbound symbols)
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 05:38:02 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report

#16646: 24.3.50; lisp-completion-at-point suggests unbound symbols

which was filed against the emacs package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 16646 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
16646: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=16646
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
To: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>
Cc: 16646-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#16646: 24.3.50;
 lisp-completion-at-point suggests unbound symbols
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 00:37:45 -0500
> 1. Open scratch buffer in emacs-lisp-mode.
> 2. Type `(+ d', press C-M-i.
> 3. See all kinds of symbols among the suggestions, starting `d',
> `d1ei' and `d2ei'. None of these three are bound variables.

I believe I've fixed this in trunk.


        Stefan

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: 24.3.50; lisp-completion-at-point suggests unbound symbols
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 05:54:58 +0200
1. Open scratch buffer in emacs-lisp-mode.

2. Type `(+ d', press C-M-i.

3. See all kinds of symbols among the suggestions, starting `d',
`d1ei' and `d2ei'. None of these three are bound variables.

But I suppose they are present in obarray. Unless we're certain that the
symbol we're completing won't be evaluated directly, though (i.e. the
head of the current list is a macro), I don't think unbound symbols
should be among the suggestions. Otherwise, this completion looks too
much like dabbrev, and if I wanted that, I could just press M-/.


In GNU Emacs 24.3.50.5 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.8.6)
 of 2014-02-01 on axl
Repository revision: 116234 dgutov <at> yandex.ru-20140201170608-2rn2phrkukqt84gm
Windowing system distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.11405000
System Description:	Ubuntu 13.10



This bug report was last modified 11 years and 186 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.