GNU bug report logs - #16638
I was hoping the Libtool would manage ordering for me

Previous Next

Package: libtool;

Reported by: Dave Yost <Dave <at> Yost.com>

Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 07:25:01 UTC

Severity: normal

To reply to this bug, email your comments to 16638 AT debbugs.gnu.org.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-libtool <at> gnu.org:
bug#16638; Package libtool. (Tue, 04 Feb 2014 07:25:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Dave Yost <Dave <at> Yost.com>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-libtool <at> gnu.org. (Tue, 04 Feb 2014 07:25:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Dave Yost <Dave <at> Yost.com>
To: bug-libtool <at> gnu.org
Subject: I was hoping the Libtool would manage ordering for me
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 23:23:34 -0800
Our code base loads .o files in a specified order so that initialization code is called in the desired order.

While looking for this feature in Libtool, I noted that the documentation uses “in order to” many times. Those usages can be streamlined by removing “in order” and just going with “to”.

If you are interested in putting an ordering feature into Libtool, I bet we could give you our code.

Thanks



Information forwarded to bug-libtool <at> gnu.org:
bug#16638; Package libtool. (Tue, 04 Feb 2014 09:12:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 16638 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Dave Yost <Dave <at> Yost.com>
To: 16638 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: BTW
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 01:11:39 -0800
Whoever wrote this documentation is my hero. It’s wonderful. Very clear and also fun.



Information forwarded to bug-libtool <at> gnu.org:
bug#16638; Package libtool. (Wed, 05 Feb 2014 06:07:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #11 received at 16638 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: "Gary V. Vaughan" <gary <at> vaughan.pe>
To: Dave Yost <Dave <at> Yost.com>
Cc: "16638 <at> debbugs.gnu.org" <16638 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: bug#16638: I was hoping the Libtool would manage ordering for me
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 19:06:30 +1300
Hi Dave,

On Feb 4, 2014, at 8:23 PM, Dave Yost <Dave <at> Yost.com> wrote:
> Our code base loads .o files in a specified order so that initialization code is called in the desired order.

That's not something I've encountered before. So it must be a C++ thing?

> While looking for this feature in Libtool, I noted that the documentation uses “in order to” many times. Those usages can be streamlined by removing “in order” and just going with “to”.

That's a weird tick I've developed, thanks for pointing it out. Without the benefit of an editor, it's easy to let unnecessary verbiage like that sneak in. Thanks for the reminder, I'll go through and cut where I can.

> If you are interested in putting an ordering feature into Libtool, I bet we could give you our code.

Patches welcome, as always!

Note that the the FSF requires copyright assignments on file before I can push any non-trivial changes. Please contact me off-list if you'd like to get the process started - it takes a few weeks, so is worth doing in case you want to send any patches in future, even if this "in order object files" proposal doesn't go through for some reason.

Cheers,
-- 
Gary V. Vaughan (gary AT vaughan DOT pe)





This bug report was last modified 11 years and 216 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.