GNU bug report logs - #16617
24.3.50; REGRESSION: `C-q ?' pops up annoying *Char Help* buffer

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>

Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 19:17:02 UTC

Severity: minor

Merged with 17371

Found in versions 24.3.50, 24.4.50

Done: Leo Liu <sdl.web <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #50 received at 16617 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Daniel Colascione <dancol <at> dancol.org>
Cc: 16617 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, sdl.web <at> gmail.com, drew.adams <at> oracle.com
Subject: Re: bug#16617: 24.3.50;
 REGRESSION: `C-q ?' pops up annoying *Char Help* buffer
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2014 10:44:00 +0300
> Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2014 12:32:02 -0700
> From: Daniel Colascione <dancol <at> dancol.org>
> CC: sdl.web <at> gmail.com, 16617 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> Drew's right this time.

In what part(s) of his long list of complaints?

> >> Why should `C-q ?' show any "help"?
> > 
> > Because '?' is a help character.
> 
> We should make an exception for C-q. Its purpose is explicitly to
> *override* normal Emacs convention. I'd be happy echoing a help message
> as soon as C-q is entered, and maybe popping up help on F1, but we
> should certainly treat "?" like any other character.

Not sure I agree about '?', but in any case this is NOT the main part
of Drew's complaints.  He says that help text should not be shown at
all, ever.  _That_ is certainly not a regression, as Emacs have
behaved like that since about forever.




This bug report was last modified 10 years and 339 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.