GNU bug report logs - #16590
flyspell-auto-correct-word dabbling deep into document

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <jidanni <at> jidanni.org>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#16590: closed (flyspell-auto-correct-word dabbling deep into
 document)
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2015 12:55:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Mon, 28 Dec 2015 20:54:18 +0800
with message-id <87y4cezqbp.fsf <at> jidanni.org>
and subject line Re: bug#16590: flyspell-auto-correct-word dabbling deep into document
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #16590,
regarding flyspell-auto-correct-word dabbling deep into document
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
16590: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=16590
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: jidanni <at> jidanni.org
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: flyspell-auto-correct-word dabbling deep into document
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 09:04:43 +0800

It is *hard to reproduce* but lately I have noticed that

  C-M-i runs the command flyspell-auto-correct-word
  Correct the current word.
  This command proposes various successive corrections for the current word.

*sometimes* instead corrects a word way below the current word.
Therefore if one notes that repeated presses apparently do nothing, one
should look below to see if it is instead changing something else deep
in your document!

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <jidanni <at> jidanni.org>
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Cc: 16590-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#16590: flyspell-auto-correct-word dabbling deep into document
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2015 20:54:18 +0800

>>>>> "LI" == Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> writes:

LI> Are you still seeing this problem?  If so, do you have a recipe
LI> (starting from -Q) to reproduce it?

Not recently, so I'll close this.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.