Subject: bug#16581: suggested code simplification in dfa.c

From: Paul Eggert <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 07:37:53 -0800

Aaron Crane wrote:
> I'd expect U+01C8 LATIN CAPITAL LETTER L WITH SMALL
> LETTER J ("Lj", roughly) to be U+01C7 LATIN CAPITAL LETTER LJ ("LJ")
> under towupper(), and U+01C9 LATIN SMALL LETTER LJ ("lj") under
> towlower().

Ouch, thanks, I hadn't considered that.  So my idea was all wrong.  But 
this means the current code is all wrong too.  I'll take a look at it. I 
hope I don't regret picking up this thread....