GNU bug report logs - #16534
gstreamer-1.0.10 tests fail

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 16534 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 16534 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Sree Harsha Totakura <sreeharsha <at> totakura.in>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: gstreamer-1.0.10 tests fail
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 11:25:39 +0100

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

One testcase for gstreamer-1.0.10 fails on my computer.  The following
output is seen when this happens:
> Running suite(s): GstBus
> 
> 
> Unexpected critical/warning: Source ID 1 was not found when
> attempting to remove it 90%: Checks: 10, Failures: 1, Errors: 0 
> gstcheck.c:72:F:stresstest:test_watch_with_custom_context:0:
> Unexpected critical/warning: Source ID 1 was not found when
> attempting to remove it FAIL: gst/gstbus

Sree
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlLiP6MACgkQO2+K8UPCHzsvWQCffO123ocNInSX7t/AzHD39cV9
GDEAoJbb/FLCARMiRpe2VuQTm0hi+zbD
=h+h7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Message #8 received at 16534 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>
To: Sree Harsha Totakura <sreeharsha <at> totakura.in>
Cc: 16534 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#16534: gstreamer-1.0.10 tests fail
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 22:04:03 +0100

On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 11:25:39AM +0100, Sree Harsha Totakura wrote:
> One testcase for gstreamer-1.0.10 fails on my computer.  The following
> output is seen when this happens:

I confirm that this happens now systematically on my machine also.
According to hydra:
Last successful build 2013-12-30
First broken build 2014-01-19

I wonder if this is related to the changes in the build daemon?
Did the content of the chroot also change?

Andreas

Message #11 received at 16534 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>
Cc: 16534 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Sree Harsha Totakura <sreeharsha <at> totakura.in>
Subject: Re: bug#16534: gstreamer-1.0.10 tests fail
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 22:35:58 +0100

Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr> skribis:

> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 11:25:39AM +0100, Sree Harsha Totakura wrote:
>> One testcase for gstreamer-1.0.10 fails on my computer.  The following
>> output is seen when this happens:
>
> I confirm that this happens now systematically on my machine also.

Same here (x86_64-linux).  Unfortunately, nothing relevant at
<https://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=specific&order=relevance+desc&bug_status=__open__&product=GStreamer&content=gstbus+test_watch_with_custom_context>
AFAICS.

> According to hydra:
> Last successful build 2013-12-30
> First broken build 2014-01-19
>
> I wonder if this is related to the changes in the build daemon?
> Did the content of the chroot also change?

No.  Also, ‘guix-daemon’ on hydra.gnu.org hasn’t been updated.

The last good commit was 40fed2d according to Hydra, and then it’s not
clear when it broke because Hydra wasn’t healthy, but the GLib update is
a suspect.

Thanks,
Ludo’.

Message #14 received at 16534 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 16534 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Sree Harsha Totakura <sreeharsha <at> totakura.in>
Subject: Re: bug#16534: gstreamer-1.0.10 tests fail
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 12:12:04 +0100

On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 10:35:58PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> The last good commit was 40fed2d according to Hydra, and then it’s not
> clear when it broke because Hydra wasn’t healthy, but the GLib update is
> a suspect.

I tried updating to glib-2.39.3. But the patches do not apply any more,
which is tedious! Could we work towards glib being more guix friendly?
It looks to me as if the cases handled by glib-tests-newnet.patch and
glib-tests-prlimit.patch could be classified as bugs and reported.

Andreas

Message #17 received at 16534 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>
Cc: 16534 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Sree Harsha Totakura <sreeharsha <at> totakura.in>
Subject: Re: bug#16534: gstreamer-1.0.10 tests fail
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 20:32:48 +0100

Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr> skribis:

> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 10:35:58PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> The last good commit was 40fed2d according to Hydra, and then it’s not
>> clear when it broke because Hydra wasn’t healthy, but the GLib update is
>> a suspect.
>
> I tried updating to glib-2.39.3. But the patches do not apply any more,
> which is tedious! Could we work towards glib being more guix friendly?
> It looks to me as if the cases handled by glib-tests-newnet.patch and
> glib-tests-prlimit.patch could be classified as bugs and reported.

Right, I’ll take care of reporting a bug for these two files.

However, am I right that these are not the ones that no longer apply?
:-)

Ludo’.

Message #20 received at 16534 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>
Cc: 16534 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Sree Harsha Totakura <sreeharsha <at> totakura.in>
Subject: Re: bug#16534: gstreamer-1.0.10 tests fail
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 21:14:06 +0100

Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr> skribis:

> It looks to me as if the cases handled by glib-tests-newnet.patch and
> glib-tests-prlimit.patch could be classified as bugs and reported.

For the record:

  https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=723048
  https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=723049

Ludo’.

Message #23 received at 16534 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>
Cc: 16534 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Sree Harsha Totakura <sreeharsha <at> totakura.in>
Subject: Re: bug#16534: gstreamer-1.0.10 tests fail
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 23:41:12 +0200

ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:

> Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr> skribis:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 11:25:39AM +0100, Sree Harsha Totakura wrote:
>>> One testcase for gstreamer-1.0.10 fails on my computer.  The following
>>> output is seen when this happens:
>>
>> I confirm that this happens now systematically on my machine also.
>
> Same here (x86_64-linux).  Unfortunately, nothing relevant at
> <https://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=specific&order=relevance+desc&bug_status=__open__&product=GStreamer&content=gstbus+test_watch_with_custom_context>
> AFAICS.

I was able to build
/gnu/store/3pdgm4r1fc7nrqdsr4a8zaqqg63kzbid-gstreamer-1.0.10 (x86_64,
with v0.5-579-gd013fe5.)

So if you confirm that it works for you, we’re all set.  :-)

Ludo’.

Message #26 received at 16534 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 16534 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Sree Harsha Totakura <sreeharsha <at> totakura.in>
Subject: Re: bug#16534: gstreamer-1.0.10 tests fail
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 16:08:30 +0200

On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 11:41:12PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> I was able to build
> /gnu/store/3pdgm4r1fc7nrqdsr4a8zaqqg63kzbid-gstreamer-1.0.10 (x86_64,
> with v0.5-579-gd013fe5.)
> So if you confirm that it works for you, we’re all set.  :-)

Indeed, I can also compile it locally.

Andreas

Message #31 received at 16534-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>
Cc: 16534-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Sree Harsha Totakura <sreeharsha <at> totakura.in>
Subject: Re: bug#16534: gstreamer-1.0.10 tests fail
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 16:51:52 +0200

Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr> skribis:

> On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 11:41:12PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> I was able to build
>> /gnu/store/3pdgm4r1fc7nrqdsr4a8zaqqg63kzbid-gstreamer-1.0.10 (x86_64,
>> with v0.5-579-gd013fe5.)
>> So if you confirm that it works for you, we’re all set.  :-)
>
> Indeed, I can also compile it locally.

OK, closing it.

Thanks,
Ludo’.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.