GNU bug report logs - #16528
24.3; too many keybindings in minibuffer-local-completion-map

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: "Roland Winkler" <winkler <at> gnu.org>

Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 13:07:02 UTC

Severity: minor

Found in version 24.3

Fixed in version 28.1

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #14 received at 16528 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
To: Roland Winkler <winkler <at> gnu.org>, Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: 16528 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: RE: bug#16528: 24.3; too many keybindings in
 minibuffer-local-completion-map
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 11:16:26 -0800 (PST)
FWIW, in Icicles:

1. All of these keys are self-inserting: SPC, ?, C-j.
2. A separate key is used to word-complete: M-SPC, not TAB.

IOW, for word completion, just use a different key.

(I would request that you do not use any combination of keys or
modifiers with TAB or <backtab> for word completion, however.)

My feeling is that word completion is generally not very important,
but I provide a key for it.

To me, SPC is far more useful if it is self-inserting, not bound
to some completion command.  But then Icicles uses completion for
lots of things, including lots of kinds of candidates that have
embedded SPC chars.

I feel the same about ? and C-j (newline).  There is no good reason
for these not to be self-inserting, IMO.  Again, in Icicles there
are lots of kinds of completion candidates, including multi-line
ones and ones that have embedded ? chars.

HTH.




This bug report was last modified 3 years and 334 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.