From unknown Sat Aug 16 10:45:08 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#16484 <16484@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#16484 <16484@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: Contradictory package count Reply-To: bug#16484 <16484@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2025 17:45:08 +0000 retitle 16484 Contradictory package count reassign 16484 guix submitter 16484 Andreas Enge severity 16484 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jan 18 07:01:05 2014 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jan 2014 12:01:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55703 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W4UaG-00034q-I2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 07:01:04 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45437) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W4UaD-00034V-HA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 07:01:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W4Ua3-00039Q-S7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 07:01:01 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:41862) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W4Ua3-00039M-Pg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 07:00:51 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47108) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W4UZw-0006cp-Gl for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 07:00:51 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W4UZo-000383-0S for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 07:00:44 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.9]:64847) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W4UZn-00037r-HX for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 07:00:35 -0500 Received: from debian (38.98.69.86.rev.sfr.net [86.69.98.38]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mreu3) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0LcaSx-1Vf1JW09EV-00k7vL; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 13:00:33 +0100 Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 13:00:30 +0100 From: Andreas Enge To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: Contradictory package count Message-ID: <20140118120030.GA7524@debian> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:z+x2CAgXdDVjlmXjSE0X7dKFtvpzK/lbyLkc/ToOeAe dJAjuGe8DIPBmRe8TZhMfJ9S1CmfDRt5F4KCp7zfcWkisel0oU CsHGpVcpmZdRK5hNIz1Gn/JtVda7fNY+c3oTJePnAARDPRb49A kkdMfiWJK9WheXeY21kJGfcFHcOG7zrGRp75sEYDu/vHyX68s6 vxab37MkFK6nEuYDBEOHQks1lrS/uJmog+djiGEsgQHPp/MWiv uXlXVZwP3DO3BLscji5PNlEa6n7hyYuoKmOGxAwmlAOjW3997m V6ICw6hYffaJmvR6P6FanDNs6Xx2LaWLzlCwnvC8aRvaG0TEQ= = X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Hello, installing a few packages, I get the following output: ... building profile '/nix/store/ylq6xn1599wfph4n6caw7kdd5wds4x9n-profile' with 65 packages...... 51 packages in profile The difference is, I think, that I consciously installed 51 packages, while the remaining 14 ones are pulled in as propagated-inputs. Could the output be made uniform, in either sense? Andreas From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jan 18 10:39:11 2014 Received: (at 16484) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jan 2014 15:39:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56277 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W4XzL-00020I-8u for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 10:39:11 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([141.255.128.1]:35999) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W4XzI-000209-S0 for 16484@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 10:39:10 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26EF118AC; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 16:39:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T6nWgkndoUuz; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 16:39:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from pluto (reverse-83.fdn.fr [80.67.176.83]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C81A51827; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 16:39:06 +0100 (CET) From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: bug#16484: Contradictory package count References: <20140118120030.GA7524@debian> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 29 =?utf-8?Q?Niv=C3=B4se?= an 222 de la =?utf-8?Q?R?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 83C4 F8E5 10A3 3B4C 5BEA D15D 77DD 95E2 EA52 ECF4 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 16:39:06 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20140118120030.GA7524@debian> (Andreas Enge's message of "Sat, 18 Jan 2014 13:00:30 +0100") Message-ID: <871u05s3j9.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130007 (Ma Gnus v0.7) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16484 Cc: 16484@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) Andreas Enge skribis: > installing a few packages, I get the following output: > > ... > building profile '/nix/store/ylq6xn1599wfph4n6caw7kdd5wds4x9n-profile' wi= th 65 packages...... > 51 packages in profile > > The difference is, I think, that I consciously installed 51 packages, whi= le > the remaining 14 ones are pulled in as propagated-inputs. Exactly. > Could the output be made uniform, in either sense? The issue is that the =E2=80=9865 packages=E2=80=99 lines comes from the bu= ild side log (which doesn=E2=80=99t know the distinction between propagated inputs and t= he rest), while the =E2=80=9851 packages=E2=80=99 line comes from =E2=80=98gui= x package=E2=80=99. Perhaps the log should say =E2=80=9865 items=E2=80=99, to make it clear it= =E2=80=99s not counting the same thing. Alternately, we could also remove that line altogether. WDYT? Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jan 23 14:39:59 2014 Received: (at 16484) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jan 2014 19:39:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33740 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W6Q86-0001A2-Rp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 14:39:59 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187]:54079) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W6Q84-00019r-1U for 16484@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 14:39:56 -0500 Received: from debian (aqu33-1-82-66-2-95.fbx.proxad.net [82.66.2.95]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mreu0) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0ME295-1W5YnN01kN-00GZ3r; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 20:39:54 +0100 Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 20:39:52 +0100 From: Andreas Enge To: Ludovic =?iso-8859-15?Q?Court=E8s?= Subject: Re: bug#16484: Contradictory package count Message-ID: <20140123193952.GA13401@debian> References: <20140118120030.GA7524@debian> <871u05s3j9.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <871u05s3j9.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:TxMRdUXR0vaMnDxJFm/6MmIkQC9fbbx7AOqwpoPdbFH Pb9bQhPZSRXnMv8qIAOtCQzchCsb/Q1MR1ZNdjspSQLEc4nE0K 2ALE39kz/hNO31TJ8JtLH7raZ9PDfC6UbYeDIWIb8AKqz8HAke 5+MObc3vhyyZZjd77LnuORZN7uO7uvb0/MZv0q2U+anuy1xJE+ VPSG5LLzysGfo1diXVYoA46WETnDR3mIKr8IPvPIrY1V6ALMGf 0ZGNPZhkMHWTJZUuVBQwQxBibwGz7H2RpZ83+5XR5nnDi8K7Qx /koohGRkBtAwy/0/DnNxzw+UVM+zEP7m5ao+lff1k0EYdQ5GA= = X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16484 Cc: 16484@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 04:39:06PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > The issue is that the ‘65 packages’ lines comes from the build side log > (which doesn’t know the distinction between propagated inputs and the > rest), while the ‘51 packages’ line comes from ‘guix package’. > > Perhaps the log should say ‘65 items’, to make it clear it’s not > counting the same thing. > > Alternately, we could also remove that line altogether. Maybe we could remove both lines even? But I am happy with removing only one, then preferably the "65 packages" one, which is not coherent with guix package -I|wc Andreas From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 24 16:11:36 2014 Received: (at 16484-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jan 2014 21:11:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34909 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W6o2J-0003AH-HW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 16:11:35 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([141.255.128.1]:47277) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W6o2G-0003A3-A8 for 16484-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 16:11:33 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A93871BEB; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 22:11:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jTVFqWHpF8RM; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 22:11:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from pluto (reverse-83.fdn.fr [80.67.176.83]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4AB7C1BE4; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 22:11:30 +0100 (CET) From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: bug#16484: Contradictory package count References: <20140118120030.GA7524@debian> <871u05s3j9.fsf@gnu.org> <20140123193952.GA13401@debian> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 5 =?utf-8?Q?Pluvi=C3=B4se?= an 222 de la =?utf-8?Q?R?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 83C4 F8E5 10A3 3B4C 5BEA D15D 77DD 95E2 EA52 ECF4 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 22:11:29 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20140123193952.GA13401@debian> (Andreas Enge's message of "Thu, 23 Jan 2014 20:39:52 +0100") Message-ID: <87a9el13we.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130007 (Ma Gnus v0.7) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16484-done Cc: 16484-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) Andreas Enge skribis: > On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 04:39:06PM +0100, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> The issue is that the =E2=80=9865 packages=E2=80=99 lines comes from the= build side log >> (which doesn=E2=80=99t know the distinction between propagated inputs an= d the >> rest), while the =E2=80=9851 packages=E2=80=99 line comes from =E2=80=98= guix package=E2=80=99. >>=20 >> Perhaps the log should say =E2=80=9865 items=E2=80=99, to make it clear = it=E2=80=99s not >> counting the same thing. >>=20 >> Alternately, we could also remove that line altogether. > > Maybe we could remove both lines even? But I am happy with removing only > one, then preferably the "65 packages" one, which is not coherent with > guix package -I|wc I removed the =E2=80=9Cwrong=E2=80=9D one, and kept the other. Thanks! Ludo=E2=80=99. From unknown Sat Aug 16 10:45:08 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 12:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator