From unknown Sat Aug 16 16:13:35 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#16484: Contradictory package count Resent-From: Andreas Enge Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 12:02:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 16484 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 16484@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.139004646511837 (code B ref -1); Sat, 18 Jan 2014 12:02:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jan 2014 12:01:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55703 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W4UaG-00034q-I2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 07:01:04 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45437) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W4UaD-00034V-HA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 07:01:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W4Ua3-00039Q-S7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 07:01:01 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:41862) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W4Ua3-00039M-Pg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 07:00:51 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47108) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W4UZw-0006cp-Gl for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 07:00:51 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W4UZo-000383-0S for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 07:00:44 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.9]:64847) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W4UZn-00037r-HX for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 07:00:35 -0500 Received: from debian (38.98.69.86.rev.sfr.net [86.69.98.38]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mreu3) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0LcaSx-1Vf1JW09EV-00k7vL; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 13:00:33 +0100 Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 13:00:30 +0100 From: Andreas Enge Message-ID: <20140118120030.GA7524@debian> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:z+x2CAgXdDVjlmXjSE0X7dKFtvpzK/lbyLkc/ToOeAe dJAjuGe8DIPBmRe8TZhMfJ9S1CmfDRt5F4KCp7zfcWkisel0oU CsHGpVcpmZdRK5hNIz1Gn/JtVda7fNY+c3oTJePnAARDPRb49A kkdMfiWJK9WheXeY21kJGfcFHcOG7zrGRp75sEYDu/vHyX68s6 vxab37MkFK6nEuYDBEOHQks1lrS/uJmog+djiGEsgQHPp/MWiv uXlXVZwP3DO3BLscji5PNlEa6n7hyYuoKmOGxAwmlAOjW3997m V6ICw6hYffaJmvR6P6FanDNs6Xx2LaWLzlCwnvC8aRvaG0TEQ= = X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Hello, installing a few packages, I get the following output: ... building profile '/nix/store/ylq6xn1599wfph4n6caw7kdd5wds4x9n-profile' with 65 packages...... 51 packages in profile The difference is, I think, that I consciously installed 51 packages, while the remaining 14 ones are pulled in as propagated-inputs. Could the output be made uniform, in either sense? Andreas From unknown Sat Aug 16 16:13:35 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#16484: Contradictory package count Resent-From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 15:40:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16484 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Andreas Enge Cc: 16484@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 16484-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16484.13900595517710 (code B ref 16484); Sat, 18 Jan 2014 15:40:01 +0000 Received: (at 16484) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jan 2014 15:39:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56277 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W4XzL-00020I-8u for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 10:39:11 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([141.255.128.1]:35999) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W4XzI-000209-S0 for 16484@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 10:39:10 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26EF118AC; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 16:39:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T6nWgkndoUuz; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 16:39:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from pluto (reverse-83.fdn.fr [80.67.176.83]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C81A51827; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 16:39:06 +0100 (CET) From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <20140118120030.GA7524@debian> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 29 =?UTF-8?Q?Niv=C3=B4se?= an 222 de la =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 83C4 F8E5 10A3 3B4C 5BEA D15D 77DD 95E2 EA52 ECF4 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 16:39:06 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20140118120030.GA7524@debian> (Andreas Enge's message of "Sat, 18 Jan 2014 13:00:30 +0100") Message-ID: <871u05s3j9.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130007 (Ma Gnus v0.7) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) Andreas Enge skribis: > installing a few packages, I get the following output: > > ... > building profile '/nix/store/ylq6xn1599wfph4n6caw7kdd5wds4x9n-profile' wi= th 65 packages...... > 51 packages in profile > > The difference is, I think, that I consciously installed 51 packages, whi= le > the remaining 14 ones are pulled in as propagated-inputs. Exactly. > Could the output be made uniform, in either sense? The issue is that the =E2=80=9865 packages=E2=80=99 lines comes from the bu= ild side log (which doesn=E2=80=99t know the distinction between propagated inputs and t= he rest), while the =E2=80=9851 packages=E2=80=99 line comes from =E2=80=98gui= x package=E2=80=99. Perhaps the log should say =E2=80=9865 items=E2=80=99, to make it clear it= =E2=80=99s not counting the same thing. Alternately, we could also remove that line altogether. WDYT? Ludo=E2=80=99. From unknown Sat Aug 16 16:13:35 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#16484: Contradictory package count Resent-From: Andreas Enge Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 19:40:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16484 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 16484@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 16484-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16484.13905059994470 (code B ref 16484); Thu, 23 Jan 2014 19:40:02 +0000 Received: (at 16484) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jan 2014 19:39:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33740 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W6Q86-0001A2-Rp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 14:39:59 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187]:54079) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W6Q84-00019r-1U for 16484@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 14:39:56 -0500 Received: from debian (aqu33-1-82-66-2-95.fbx.proxad.net [82.66.2.95]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mreu0) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0ME295-1W5YnN01kN-00GZ3r; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 20:39:54 +0100 Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 20:39:52 +0100 From: Andreas Enge Message-ID: <20140123193952.GA13401@debian> References: <20140118120030.GA7524@debian> <871u05s3j9.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <871u05s3j9.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:TxMRdUXR0vaMnDxJFm/6MmIkQC9fbbx7AOqwpoPdbFH Pb9bQhPZSRXnMv8qIAOtCQzchCsb/Q1MR1ZNdjspSQLEc4nE0K 2ALE39kz/hNO31TJ8JtLH7raZ9PDfC6UbYeDIWIb8AKqz8HAke 5+MObc3vhyyZZjd77LnuORZN7uO7uvb0/MZv0q2U+anuy1xJE+ VPSG5LLzysGfo1diXVYoA46WETnDR3mIKr8IPvPIrY1V6ALMGf 0ZGNPZhkMHWTJZUuVBQwQxBibwGz7H2RpZ83+5XR5nnDi8K7Qx /koohGRkBtAwy/0/DnNxzw+UVM+zEP7m5ao+lff1k0EYdQ5GA= = X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 04:39:06PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > The issue is that the ‘65 packages’ lines comes from the build side log > (which doesn’t know the distinction between propagated inputs and the > rest), while the ‘51 packages’ line comes from ‘guix package’. > > Perhaps the log should say ‘65 items’, to make it clear it’s not > counting the same thing. > > Alternately, we could also remove that line altogether. Maybe we could remove both lines even? But I am happy with removing only one, then preferably the "65 packages" one, which is not coherent with guix package -I|wc Andreas From unknown Sat Aug 16 16:13:35 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.503 (Entity 5.503) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: Andreas Enge Subject: bug#16484: closed (Re: bug#16484: Contradictory package count) Message-ID: References: <87a9el13we.fsf@gnu.org> <20140118120030.GA7524@debian> X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 16484 X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix Reply-To: 16484@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 21:12:02 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1390597922-12238-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1390597922-12238-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #16484: Contradictory package count which was filed against the guix package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 16484@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 16484: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D16484 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1390597922-12238-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 16484-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jan 2014 21:11:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34909 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W6o2J-0003AH-HW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 16:11:35 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([141.255.128.1]:47277) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W6o2G-0003A3-A8 for 16484-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 16:11:33 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A93871BEB; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 22:11:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jTVFqWHpF8RM; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 22:11:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from pluto (reverse-83.fdn.fr [80.67.176.83]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4AB7C1BE4; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 22:11:30 +0100 (CET) From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: bug#16484: Contradictory package count References: <20140118120030.GA7524@debian> <871u05s3j9.fsf@gnu.org> <20140123193952.GA13401@debian> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 5 =?utf-8?Q?Pluvi=C3=B4se?= an 222 de la =?utf-8?Q?R?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 83C4 F8E5 10A3 3B4C 5BEA D15D 77DD 95E2 EA52 ECF4 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 22:11:29 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20140123193952.GA13401@debian> (Andreas Enge's message of "Thu, 23 Jan 2014 20:39:52 +0100") Message-ID: <87a9el13we.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130007 (Ma Gnus v0.7) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16484-done Cc: 16484-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) Andreas Enge skribis: > On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 04:39:06PM +0100, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> The issue is that the =E2=80=9865 packages=E2=80=99 lines comes from the= build side log >> (which doesn=E2=80=99t know the distinction between propagated inputs an= d the >> rest), while the =E2=80=9851 packages=E2=80=99 line comes from =E2=80=98= guix package=E2=80=99. >>=20 >> Perhaps the log should say =E2=80=9865 items=E2=80=99, to make it clear = it=E2=80=99s not >> counting the same thing. >>=20 >> Alternately, we could also remove that line altogether. > > Maybe we could remove both lines even? But I am happy with removing only > one, then preferably the "65 packages" one, which is not coherent with > guix package -I|wc I removed the =E2=80=9Cwrong=E2=80=9D one, and kept the other. Thanks! Ludo=E2=80=99. ------------=_1390597922-12238-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jan 2014 12:01:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55703 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W4UaG-00034q-I2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 07:01:04 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45437) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W4UaD-00034V-HA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 07:01:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W4Ua3-00039Q-S7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 07:01:01 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:41862) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W4Ua3-00039M-Pg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 07:00:51 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47108) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W4UZw-0006cp-Gl for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 07:00:51 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W4UZo-000383-0S for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 07:00:44 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.9]:64847) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W4UZn-00037r-HX for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 07:00:35 -0500 Received: from debian (38.98.69.86.rev.sfr.net [86.69.98.38]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mreu3) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0LcaSx-1Vf1JW09EV-00k7vL; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 13:00:33 +0100 Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 13:00:30 +0100 From: Andreas Enge To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: Contradictory package count Message-ID: <20140118120030.GA7524@debian> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:z+x2CAgXdDVjlmXjSE0X7dKFtvpzK/lbyLkc/ToOeAe dJAjuGe8DIPBmRe8TZhMfJ9S1CmfDRt5F4KCp7zfcWkisel0oU CsHGpVcpmZdRK5hNIz1Gn/JtVda7fNY+c3oTJePnAARDPRb49A kkdMfiWJK9WheXeY21kJGfcFHcOG7zrGRp75sEYDu/vHyX68s6 vxab37MkFK6nEuYDBEOHQks1lrS/uJmog+djiGEsgQHPp/MWiv uXlXVZwP3DO3BLscji5PNlEa6n7hyYuoKmOGxAwmlAOjW3997m V6ICw6hYffaJmvR6P6FanDNs6Xx2LaWLzlCwnvC8aRvaG0TEQ= = X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Hello, installing a few packages, I get the following output: ... building profile '/nix/store/ylq6xn1599wfph4n6caw7kdd5wds4x9n-profile' with 65 packages...... 51 packages in profile The difference is, I think, that I consciously installed 51 packages, while the remaining 14 ones are pulled in as propagated-inputs. Could the output be made uniform, in either sense? Andreas ------------=_1390597922-12238-1--