GNU bug report logs - #16440
24.3.50; Some colors of the theme aren't respected in latest Emacs

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Sebastien Vauban <sva-news <at> mygooglest.com>
Cc: 16440 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, rgm <at> gnu.org
Subject: bug#16440: bug#16780: 24.2.91; Emacs crash when C-c C-c on captured item
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 20:04:47 +0200

> From: "Sebastien Vauban" <sva-news <at> mygooglest.com>
> Cc: 16440 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, rgm <at> gnu.org
> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 09:37:45 +0100
> 
> >> > What image types do you have available in the problematic binary?
> >> > This could be some incompatibility between the image libraries against
> >> > which Dani built his binary and the DLLs you have installed on your
> >> > system.  See README.W32 and/or nt/INSTALL for the details.
> >> 
> >> This is mainly on specific faces (not all, just a minority) not being
> >> applied...
> >
> > Your screencast shows a black-and-white Gnu head.  Is that still a
> > problem?
> 
> The Gnu head is with an orange background (#FF8C00). See
> http://screencast.com/t/s6sWP3Nsc.

It is still mono-color, which isn't right.

> That seems to be the invert of what it should (as specified in the
> Leuven theme):
> 
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>    `(gnus-splash ((,class (:foreground "#FF8C00"))))
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

That's gnus-splash, not Emacs splash, right?  Or am I missing
something?

> > Then please tell what does evaluating the following produce
> > in "emacs -Q":
> >
> >   (mapcar (lambda (elt)
> > 	    (list (car elt) (image-type-available-p (car elt))))
> > 	  dynamic-library-alist)
> 
> See http://screencast.com/t/SmhmZ629B:
> 
>   ╭────
>   │ ((xpm nil) (png nil) (tiff nil) (jpeg nil) (gif nil) (svg nil)
>   │ (gdk-pixbuf nil) (glib nil) (gobject nil) (gnutls nil) (libxml2 nil)
>   │ (zlib nil))
>   ╰────

You don't have any image libraries available.  If that bothers you,
read README.W32 or nt/INSTALL.

> >> See http://screencast.com/t/m2urFNhsSrN for a comparison, with all
> >> parameters identical (same config file, same theme file), but the
> >> version of the Emacs binary...
> >
> > What faces?  Can you provide a simple, small, self-contained test
> > case?
> 
> New screenshot: http://screencast.com/t/LDKtOSOB.
> 
> Test file:
> 
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> * Code block
> 
> #+begin_src emacs-lisp
> ;; the above line must be displayed as `org-block-begin-line'
> (message "echo")                        ; a line of code, such as this one, is
>                                         ; displayed as `org-block-background'
> ;; the line below this one must be displayed as `org-block-end-line'
> #+end_src
> 
> * Mail contents
> 
> #+begin_verse
> The "borders" of this block must be displayed as `org-block-begin/end-line'.
> 
> The "inside" must be displayed as `org-verse'...
> 
> Foo
> Bar
> Baz
> #+end_verse
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

OK, but what should one do with this file, starting with "emacs -Q",
to reproduce the problem?  The screenshot only shows the results, not
what you did to achieve them.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.