GNU bug report logs - #16440
24.3.50; Some colors of the theme aren't respected in latest Emacs

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: "Sebastien Vauban" <sva-news <at> mygooglest.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 16440 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, rgm <at> gnu.org
Subject: bug#16440: bug#16780: 24.2.91; Emacs crash when C-c C-c on captured item
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 09:37:45 +0100

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> From: "Sebastien Vauban" <sva-news <at> mygooglest.com>
>> Cc: 16780 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, 16440 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>> Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 22:39:33 +0100
>> 
>> > With just this line in my .emacs:
>> >
>> >   (load-theme 'leuven t)
>> >
>> > I cannot reproduce the picture you show in the report.  I see a color
>> > Gnu head.
>> >
>> > What image types do you have available in the problematic binary?
>> > This could be some incompatibility between the image libraries against
>> > which Dani built his binary and the DLLs you have installed on your
>> > system.  See README.W32 and/or nt/INSTALL for the details.
>> 
>> This is mainly on specific faces (not all, just a minority) not being
>> applied...
>
> Your screencast shows a black-and-white Gnu head.  Is that still a
> problem?

The Gnu head is with an orange background (#FF8C00). See
http://screencast.com/t/s6sWP3Nsc.

That seems to be the invert of what it should (as specified in the
Leuven theme):

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
   `(gnus-splash ((,class (:foreground "#FF8C00"))))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

> Then please tell what does evaluating the following produce
> in "emacs -Q":
>
>   (mapcar (lambda (elt)
> 	    (list (car elt) (image-type-available-p (car elt))))
> 	  dynamic-library-alist)

See http://screencast.com/t/SmhmZ629B:

  ╭────
  │ ((xpm nil) (png nil) (tiff nil) (jpeg nil) (gif nil) (svg nil)
  │ (gdk-pixbuf nil) (glib nil) (gobject nil) (gnutls nil) (libxml2 nil)
  │ (zlib nil))
  ╰────

>> See http://screencast.com/t/m2urFNhsSrN for a comparison, with all
>> parameters identical (same config file, same theme file), but the
>> version of the Emacs binary...
>
> What faces?  Can you provide a simple, small, self-contained test
> case?

New screenshot: http://screencast.com/t/LDKtOSOB.

Test file:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
* Code block

#+begin_src emacs-lisp
;; the above line must be displayed as `org-block-begin-line'
(message "echo")                        ; a line of code, such as this one, is
                                        ; displayed as `org-block-background'
;; the line below this one must be displayed as `org-block-end-line'
#+end_src

* Mail contents

#+begin_verse
The "borders" of this block must be displayed as `org-block-begin/end-line'.

The "inside" must be displayed as `org-verse'...

Foo
Bar
Baz
#+end_verse
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Best regards,
  Seb

-- 
Sebastien Vauban

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.