From unknown Thu Jun 19 14:04:28 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#16440 <16440@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#16440 <16440@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 24.3.50; Some colors of the theme aren't respected in latest Emacs Reply-To: bug#16440 <16440@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 21:04:28 +0000 retitle 16440 24.3.50; Some colors of the theme aren't respected in latest = Emacs reassign 16440 emacs submitter 16440 "Sebastien Vauban" severity 16440 important thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jan 14 07:34:34 2014 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Jan 2014 12:34:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49785 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W33CT-0004Zs-Lg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 07:34:34 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37991) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W33CN-0004ZU-T9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 07:34:28 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W33CI-00005a-BY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 07:34:27 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:54108) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W33CI-00005W-8z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 07:34:22 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39660) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W33CD-000378-FG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 07:34:22 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W33C8-0008VN-IK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 07:34:17 -0500 Received: from dd5e0353a.access.telenet.be ([213.224.53.58]:17410 helo=mail.missioncriticalit.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W33C8-0008VC-BY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 07:34:12 -0500 Received: from MUNDANEUM.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me (unknown [10.10.10.51]) by mail.missioncriticalit.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56D1D500A2D for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 13:36:53 +0100 (CET) From: "Sebastien Vauban" To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 24.3.50; Some colors of the theme aren't respected in latest Emacs Organization: Sebastien Vauban X-Url: Under construction... X-Archive: encrypt Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 13:32:42 +0100 Message-ID: <86d2jubv6d.fsf@somewhere.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (windows-nt) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.3 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.3 (----) Hello, Because of the performance problem (with some Unicode chars), I'm still using GNU Emacs 24.3.50.1 (i686-pc-mingw32) of 2013-10-19 on LEG570 for a while. Now, I tried to move to one of the latest versions made available by Dani. The performance problem has disappeared, but there are some problems with the color theme (Leuven [1], in my case). See http://screencast.com/t/kvuLrvtVZ2l6 for a comparison of how the faces were displayed in older Emacs and in the current one. What's weird is that there are differences in the face specifications which are seen by both Emacs: see http://screencast.com/t/gsyeXp40TAa. Though, both Emacs are run in the exact same way, with the exact same versions of the color theme, and with the exact same version of Org. Best regards, Seb [1] Which is present in the current trunk. -- Sebastien Vauban From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jan 14 11:57:45 2014 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Jan 2014 16:57:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50524 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W37JA-0003wL-SJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 11:57:45 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:58420) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W37J8-0003wD-V5 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 11:57:43 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W37J8-0003q0-My for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 11:57:42 -0500 Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 11:57:42 -0500 Message-Id: Subject: control message for bug 16440 To: X-Mailer: mail (GNU Mailutils 2.1) From: Glenn Morris X-Spam-Score: -5.1 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.1 (-----) forcemerge 16434 16440 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jan 22 04:41:13 2014 Received: (at 16440) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Jan 2014 09:41:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60256 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W5uJ7-00050F-C3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 04:41:13 -0500 Received: from dd5e0353a.access.telenet.be ([213.224.53.58]:62479 helo=mail.missioncriticalit.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W5uJ5-000507-12 for 16440@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 04:41:11 -0500 Received: from MUNDANEUM.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me (unknown [10.10.10.51]) by mail.missioncriticalit.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 050B0500917; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 10:43:53 +0100 (CET) From: "Sebastien Vauban" To: 16440@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#16440: 24.3.50; Some colors of the theme aren't respected in latest Emacs Organization: Sebastien Vauban References: X-Url: Under construction... X-Archive: encrypt Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 10:39:31 +0100 Message-ID: <86txcwbbjg.fsf@somewhere.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (windows-nt) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16440 Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) Hello, > See http://screencast.com/t/kvuLrvtVZ2l6 for a comparison of how the > faces were displayed in older Emacs and in the current one. Giving more "data points" on this with a MINIMAL Emacs configuration (proving, if needs be, that it isn't due to something misconfigured in my long configuration file): $ /cygdrive/c/Program\ Files\ \(x86\)/emacs-r114715-20131019-w32/bin/emacs -q -l ~/.emacs-minimal.el & vs. $ /cygdrive/c/Program\ Files\ \(x86\)/emacs-trunk/bin/emacs -q -l ~/.emacs-minimal.el & (where trunk version is r116068 from 2014-01-19). - At startup already, the logo is black and white in the newest Emacs. See http://screencast.com/t/ZU2oEOrVqm. - When opening an Org file with code blocks, the "code delimiters" aren't correctly rendered. See http://screencast.com/t/gLcMVvvgd9Ac. Minimal Emacs configuration file: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- (message "Loading Minimal Emacs...") (setq frame-title-format (format "Minimal Emacs %s rev:%s of %s PID:%d" ;; (capitalize (symbol-name system-type)) emacs-version (ignore-errors (replace-regexp-in-string " .*" "" emacs-bzr-version)) (format-time-string "%Y-%m-%d" emacs-build-time) (emacs-pid))) (add-to-list 'load-path "~/git/org-mode/lisp") (load-theme 'leuven t) --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Best regards, Seb -- Sebastien Vauban From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 12 17:22:01 2014 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Feb 2014 22:22:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49415 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WDiBs-00024w-O5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 17:22:01 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:52316 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WDiBq-00024m-DE for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 17:21:58 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WDiBq-0005Qm-6h for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 17:21:58 -0500 Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 17:21:58 -0500 Message-Id: Subject: control message for bug 16694 To: X-Mailer: mail (GNU Mailutils 2.1) From: Glenn Morris X-Spam-Score: -5.7 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.7 (-----) merge 16443 16694 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Feb 17 16:33:32 2014 Received: (at 16440) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Feb 2014 21:33:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57098 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WFVoh-00020p-Fp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 16:33:31 -0500 Received: from dd5e0353a.access.telenet.be ([213.224.53.58]:61011 helo=mail.missioncriticalit.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WFVod-00020T-VW; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 16:33:29 -0500 Received: from MUNDANEUM.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me (unknown [10.10.4.62]) by mail.missioncriticalit.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A784350116C; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 22:33:21 +0100 (CET) From: "Sebastien Vauban" To: Eli Zaretskii , 16780@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#16780: 24.2.91; Emacs crash when C-c C-c on captured item Organization: Sebastien Vauban References: <86sirhspex.fsf@somewhere.org> <83ob2590nf.fsf@gnu.org> <86mwhpv41s.fsf@somewhere.org> <83wqgt7862.fsf@gnu.org> X-Url: Under construction... X-Archive: encrypt Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 22:33:11 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Sebastien Vauban's message of "Mon, 17 Feb 2014 22:23:03 +0100") Message-ID: <8661odv2zs.fsf@somewhere.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (windows-nt) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 3.2 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: "Sebastien Vauban" wrote: > Eli Zaretskii wrote: >>> From: "Sebastien Vauban" >>> Cc: 16780@debbugs.gnu.org >>> Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 22:10:23 +0100 >>> >>> Eli Zaretskii wrote: >>> >> Please note that the crash occurred with Emacs 24.3.50 (r114715) from >>> >> 2013-10-19. >>> > >>> > That's a very old version. >>> >>> Yes, I'm not really fond of using a more recent version because of the >>> following bug: >>> >>> http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=16440 >>> >>> which affects parts of my display. >> >> ??? That one was solved ages ago, AFAIK. > > I'm not sure by what you mean by "ages ago". > > I just see it's still open (there has even been 0 comments on it), and > I do have it in GNU Emacs 24.3.50.1 (r116256) of 2014-02-03. [...] Content analysis details: (3.2 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.3 RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL RBL: Relay in RNBL, https://senderscore.org/blacklistlookup/ [213.224.53.58 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com] 0.7 SPF_NEUTRAL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (neutral) 1.3 GAPPY_SUBJECT Subject: contains G.a.p.p.y-T.e.x.t X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16440 Cc: 16440@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 3.2 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: "Sebastien Vauban" wrote: > Eli Zaretskii wrote: >>> From: "Sebastien Vauban" >>> Cc: 16780@debbugs.gnu.org >>> Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 22:10:23 +0100 >>> >>> Eli Zaretskii wrote: >>> >> Please note that the crash occurred with Emacs 24.3.50 (r114715) from >>> >> 2013-10-19. >>> > >>> > That's a very old version. >>> >>> Yes, I'm not really fond of using a more recent version because of the >>> following bug: >>> >>> http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=16440 >>> >>> which affects parts of my display. >> >> ??? That one was solved ages ago, AFAIK. > > I'm not sure by what you mean by "ages ago". > > I just see it's still open (there has even been 0 comments on it), and > I do have it in GNU Emacs 24.3.50.1 (r116256) of 2014-02-03. [...] Content analysis details: (3.2 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.3 RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL RBL: Relay in RNBL, https://senderscore.org/blacklistlookup/ [213.224.53.58 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com] 0.7 SPF_NEUTRAL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (neutral) 1.3 GAPPY_SUBJECT Subject: contains G.a.p.p.y-T.e.x.t "Sebastien Vauban" wrote: > Eli Zaretskii wrote: >>> From: "Sebastien Vauban" >>> Cc: 16780@debbugs.gnu.org >>> Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 22:10:23 +0100 >>> >>> Eli Zaretskii wrote: >>> >> Please note that the crash occurred with Emacs 24.3.50 (r114715) from >>> >> 2013-10-19. >>> > >>> > That's a very old version. >>> >>> Yes, I'm not really fond of using a more recent version because of the >>> following bug: >>> >>> http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=16440 >>> >>> which affects parts of my display. >> >> ??? That one was solved ages ago, AFAIK. > > I'm not sure by what you mean by "ages ago". > > I just see it's still open (there has even been 0 comments on it), and > I do have it in GNU Emacs 24.3.50.1 (r116256) of 2014-02-03. I just see that Dani uploaded a new version of Emacs: GNU Emacs 24.3.50.1 (116464) of 2014-02-17. I tested the bug #16440 against it, and I still have it. Best regards, Seb -- Sebastien Vauban From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Feb 17 16:39:52 2014 Received: (at 16440) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Feb 2014 21:39:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57128 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WFVup-0002Dn-JM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 16:39:52 -0500 Received: from dd5e0353a.access.telenet.be ([213.224.53.58]:15980 helo=mail.missioncriticalit.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WFVuo-0002DW-6Q; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 16:39:50 -0500 Received: from MUNDANEUM.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me (unknown [10.10.4.62]) by mail.missioncriticalit.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3169650116C; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 22:39:44 +0100 (CET) From: "Sebastien Vauban" To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#16780: 24.2.91; Emacs crash when C-c C-c on captured item Organization: Sebastien Vauban References: <86sirhspex.fsf@somewhere.org> <83ob2590nf.fsf@gnu.org> <86mwhpv41s.fsf@somewhere.org> <83wqgt7862.fsf@gnu.org> <86a9dpv3go.fsf@somewhere.org> <83txbx77ev.fsf@gnu.org> X-Url: Under construction... X-Archive: encrypt Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 22:39:33 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83txbx77ev.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 17 Feb 2014 23:31:36 +0200") Message-ID: <861tz1v2p6.fsf@somewhere.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (windows-nt) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 3.2 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: "Sebastien Vauban" >> Cc: 16780@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 22:23:03 +0100 >> >> Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> >> From: "Sebastien Vauban" >> >> Cc: 16780@debbugs.gnu.org >> >> Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 22:10:23 +0100 >> >> >> >> Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> >> >> Please note that the crash occurred with Emacs 24.3.50 (r114715) from >> >> >> 2013-10-19. >> >> > >> >> > That's a very old version. >> >> >> >> Yes, I'm not really fond of using a more recent version because of the >> >> following bug: >> >> >> >> http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=16440 >> >> >> >> which affects parts of my display. >> > >> > ??? That one was solved ages ago, AFAIK. >> >> I'm not sure by what you mean by "ages ago". >> >> I just see it's still open (there has even been 0 comments on it), and >> I do have it in GNU Emacs 24.3.50.1 (r116256) of 2014-02-03. > > With just this line in my .emacs: > > (load-theme 'leuven t) > > I cannot reproduce the picture you show in the report. I see a color > Gnu head. > > What image types do you have available in the problematic binary? > This could be some incompatibility between the image libraries against > which Dani built his binary and the DLLs you have installed on your > system. See README.W32 and/or nt/INSTALL for the details. [...] Content analysis details: (3.2 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.3 RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL RBL: Relay in RNBL, https://senderscore.org/blacklistlookup/ [213.224.53.58 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com] 0.7 SPF_NEUTRAL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (neutral) 1.3 GAPPY_SUBJECT Subject: contains G.a.p.p.y-T.e.x.t X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16440 Cc: 16440@debbugs.gnu.org, 16780@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 3.2 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: "Sebastien Vauban" >> Cc: 16780@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 22:23:03 +0100 >> >> Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> >> From: "Sebastien Vauban" >> >> Cc: 16780@debbugs.gnu.org >> >> Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 22:10:23 +0100 >> >> >> >> Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> >> >> Please note that the crash occurred with Emacs 24.3.50 (r114715) from >> >> >> 2013-10-19. >> >> > >> >> > That's a very old version. >> >> >> >> Yes, I'm not really fond of using a more recent version because of the >> >> following bug: >> >> >> >> http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=16440 >> >> >> >> which affects parts of my display. >> > >> > ??? That one was solved ages ago, AFAIK. >> >> I'm not sure by what you mean by "ages ago". >> >> I just see it's still open (there has even been 0 comments on it), and >> I do have it in GNU Emacs 24.3.50.1 (r116256) of 2014-02-03. > > With just this line in my .emacs: > > (load-theme 'leuven t) > > I cannot reproduce the picture you show in the report. I see a color > Gnu head. > > What image types do you have available in the problematic binary? > This could be some incompatibility between the image libraries against > which Dani built his binary and the DLLs you have installed on your > system. See README.W32 and/or nt/INSTALL for the details. [...] Content analysis details: (3.2 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.3 RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL RBL: Relay in RNBL, https://senderscore.org/blacklistlookup/ [213.224.53.58 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com] 0.7 SPF_NEUTRAL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (neutral) 1.3 GAPPY_SUBJECT Subject: contains G.a.p.p.y-T.e.x.t Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: "Sebastien Vauban" >> Cc: 16780@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 22:23:03 +0100 >> >> Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> >> From: "Sebastien Vauban" >> >> Cc: 16780@debbugs.gnu.org >> >> Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 22:10:23 +0100 >> >> >> >> Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> >> >> Please note that the crash occurred with Emacs 24.3.50 (r114715) from >> >> >> 2013-10-19. >> >> > >> >> > That's a very old version. >> >> >> >> Yes, I'm not really fond of using a more recent version because of the >> >> following bug: >> >> >> >> http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=16440 >> >> >> >> which affects parts of my display. >> > >> > ??? That one was solved ages ago, AFAIK. >> >> I'm not sure by what you mean by "ages ago". >> >> I just see it's still open (there has even been 0 comments on it), and >> I do have it in GNU Emacs 24.3.50.1 (r116256) of 2014-02-03. > > With just this line in my .emacs: > > (load-theme 'leuven t) > > I cannot reproduce the picture you show in the report. I see a color > Gnu head. > > What image types do you have available in the problematic binary? > This could be some incompatibility between the image libraries against > which Dani built his binary and the DLLs you have installed on your > system. See README.W32 and/or nt/INSTALL for the details. This is mainly on specific faces (not all, just a minority) not being applied... See http://screencast.com/t/m2urFNhsSrN for a comparison, with all parameters identical (same config file, same theme file), but the version of the Emacs binary... Best regards, Seb -- Sebastien Vauban From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Feb 17 16:47:19 2014 Received: (at 16440) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Feb 2014 21:47:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57137 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WFW22-0002Py-Nd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 16:47:19 -0500 Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:64426) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WFW1z-0002Pc-4v; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 16:47:16 -0500 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N1500F00TATGU00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 23:47:08 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N1500FZ4TUKBQ70@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 23:47:08 +0200 (IST) Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 23:47:15 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#16780: 24.2.91; Emacs crash when C-c C-c on captured item In-reply-to: <861tz1v2p6.fsf@somewhere.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Sebastien Vauban Message-id: <83r47176os.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86sirhspex.fsf@somewhere.org> <83ob2590nf.fsf@gnu.org> <86mwhpv41s.fsf@somewhere.org> <83wqgt7862.fsf@gnu.org> <86a9dpv3go.fsf@somewhere.org> <83txbx77ev.fsf@gnu.org> <861tz1v2p6.fsf@somewhere.org> X-Spam-Score: 2.3 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > From: "Sebastien Vauban" > Cc: 16780@debbugs.gnu.org, 16440@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 22:39:33 +0100 > > > With just this line in my .emacs: > > > > (load-theme 'leuven t) > > > > I cannot reproduce the picture you show in the report. I see a color > > Gnu head. > > > > What image types do you have available in the problematic binary? > > This could be some incompatibility between the image libraries against > > which Dani built his binary and the DLLs you have installed on your > > system. See README.W32 and/or nt/INSTALL for the details. > > This is mainly on specific faces (not all, just a minority) not being > applied... [...] Content analysis details: (2.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.179.55.169 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 1.3 GAPPY_SUBJECT Subject: contains G.a.p.p.y-T.e.x.t X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16440 Cc: 16440@debbugs.gnu.org, 16780@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.3 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > From: "Sebastien Vauban" > Cc: 16780@debbugs.gnu.org, 16440@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 22:39:33 +0100 > > > With just this line in my .emacs: > > > > (load-theme 'leuven t) > > > > I cannot reproduce the picture you show in the report. I see a color > > Gnu head. > > > > What image types do you have available in the problematic binary? > > This could be some incompatibility between the image libraries against > > which Dani built his binary and the DLLs you have installed on your > > system. See README.W32 and/or nt/INSTALL for the details. > > This is mainly on specific faces (not all, just a minority) not being > applied... [...] Content analysis details: (2.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.179.55.169 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 1.3 GAPPY_SUBJECT Subject: contains G.a.p.p.y-T.e.x.t > From: "Sebastien Vauban" > Cc: 16780@debbugs.gnu.org, 16440@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 22:39:33 +0100 > > > With just this line in my .emacs: > > > > (load-theme 'leuven t) > > > > I cannot reproduce the picture you show in the report. I see a color > > Gnu head. > > > > What image types do you have available in the problematic binary? > > This could be some incompatibility between the image libraries against > > which Dani built his binary and the DLLs you have installed on your > > system. See README.W32 and/or nt/INSTALL for the details. > > This is mainly on specific faces (not all, just a minority) not being > applied... Your screencast shows a black-and-white Gnu head. Is that still a problem? Then please tell what does evaluating the following produce in "emacs -Q": (mapcar (lambda (elt) (list (car elt) (image-type-available-p (car elt)))) dynamic-library-alist) > See http://screencast.com/t/m2urFNhsSrN for a comparison, with all > parameters identical (same config file, same theme file), but the > version of the Emacs binary... What faces? Can you provide a simple, small, self-contained test case? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 18 03:38:07 2014 Received: (at 16440) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Feb 2014 08:38:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57535 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WFgBq-0006jM-EI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 03:38:06 -0500 Received: from dd5e0353a.access.telenet.be ([213.224.53.58]:3699 helo=mail.missioncriticalit.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WFgBo-0006ip-Oh for 16440@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 03:38:05 -0500 Received: from MUNDANEUM.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me (unknown [10.10.10.51]) by mail.missioncriticalit.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47BA75000CA; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 09:37:58 +0100 (CET) From: "Sebastien Vauban" To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#16780: 24.2.91; Emacs crash when C-c C-c on captured item Organization: Sebastien Vauban References: <86sirhspex.fsf@somewhere.org> <83ob2590nf.fsf@gnu.org> <86mwhpv41s.fsf@somewhere.org> <83wqgt7862.fsf@gnu.org> <86a9dpv3go.fsf@somewhere.org> <83txbx77ev.fsf@gnu.org> <861tz1v2p6.fsf@somewhere.org> <83r47176os.fsf@gnu.org> X-Url: Under construction... X-Archive: encrypt Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 09:37:45 +0100 Message-ID: <86lhx8u886.fsf@somewhere.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (windows-nt) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 3.2 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: "Sebastien Vauban" >> Cc: 16780@debbugs.gnu.org, 16440@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 22:39:33 +0100 >> >> > With just this line in my .emacs: >> > >> > (load-theme 'leuven t) >> > >> > I cannot reproduce the picture you show in the report. I see a color >> > Gnu head. >> > >> > What image types do you have available in the problematic binary? >> > This could be some incompatibility between the image libraries against >> > which Dani built his binary and the DLLs you have installed on your >> > system. See README.W32 and/or nt/INSTALL for the details. >> >> This is mainly on specific faces (not all, just a minority) not being >> applied... > > Your screencast shows a black-and-white Gnu head. Is that still a > problem? [...] Content analysis details: (3.2 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.3 RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL RBL: Relay in RNBL, https://senderscore.org/blacklistlookup/ [213.224.53.58 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com] 0.7 SPF_NEUTRAL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (neutral) 1.3 GAPPY_SUBJECT Subject: contains G.a.p.p.y-T.e.x.t X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16440 Cc: 16440@debbugs.gnu.org, rgm@gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 3.2 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: "Sebastien Vauban" >> Cc: 16780@debbugs.gnu.org, 16440@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 22:39:33 +0100 >> >> > With just this line in my .emacs: >> > >> > (load-theme 'leuven t) >> > >> > I cannot reproduce the picture you show in the report. I see a color >> > Gnu head. >> > >> > What image types do you have available in the problematic binary? >> > This could be some incompatibility between the image libraries against >> > which Dani built his binary and the DLLs you have installed on your >> > system. See README.W32 and/or nt/INSTALL for the details. >> >> This is mainly on specific faces (not all, just a minority) not being >> applied... > > Your screencast shows a black-and-white Gnu head. Is that still a > problem? [...] Content analysis details: (3.2 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.3 RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL RBL: Relay in RNBL, https://senderscore.org/blacklistlookup/ [213.224.53.58 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com] 0.7 SPF_NEUTRAL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (neutral) 1.3 GAPPY_SUBJECT Subject: contains G.a.p.p.y-T.e.x.t Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: "Sebastien Vauban" >> Cc: 16780@debbugs.gnu.org, 16440@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 22:39:33 +0100 >>=20 >> > With just this line in my .emacs: >> > >> > (load-theme 'leuven t) >> > >> > I cannot reproduce the picture you show in the report. I see a color >> > Gnu head. >> > >> > What image types do you have available in the problematic binary? >> > This could be some incompatibility between the image libraries against >> > which Dani built his binary and the DLLs you have installed on your >> > system. See README.W32 and/or nt/INSTALL for the details. >>=20 >> This is mainly on specific faces (not all, just a minority) not being >> applied... > > Your screencast shows a black-and-white Gnu head. Is that still a > problem? The Gnu head is with an orange background (#FF8C00). See http://screencast.com/t/s6sWP3Nsc. That seems to be the invert of what it should (as specified in the Leuven theme): --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- `(gnus-splash ((,class (:foreground "#FF8C00")))) --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > Then please tell what does evaluating the following produce > in "emacs -Q": > > (mapcar (lambda (elt) > (list (car elt) (image-type-available-p (car elt)))) > dynamic-library-alist) See http://screencast.com/t/SmhmZ629B: =E2=95=AD=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 =E2=94=82 ((xpm nil) (png nil) (tiff nil) (jpeg nil) (gif nil) (svg nil) =E2=94=82 (gdk-pixbuf nil) (glib nil) (gobject nil) (gnutls nil) (libxml2= nil) =E2=94=82 (zlib nil)) =E2=95=B0=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 >> See http://screencast.com/t/m2urFNhsSrN for a comparison, with all >> parameters identical (same config file, same theme file), but the >> version of the Emacs binary... > > What faces? Can you provide a simple, small, self-contained test > case? New screenshot: http://screencast.com/t/LDKtOSOB. Test file: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- * Code block #+begin_src emacs-lisp ;; the above line must be displayed as `org-block-begin-line' (message "echo") ; a line of code, such as this one,= is ; displayed as `org-block-backgroun= d' ;; the line below this one must be displayed as `org-block-end-line' #+end_src * Mail contents #+begin_verse The "borders" of this block must be displayed as `org-block-begin/end-line'. The "inside" must be displayed as `org-verse'... Foo Bar Baz #+end_verse --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Best regards, Seb --=20 Sebastien Vauban From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 18 13:04:49 2014 Received: (at 16440) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Feb 2014 18:04:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58778 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WFp2G-0007Nn-Pa for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 13:04:49 -0500 Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:56847) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WFp2D-0007NT-AW for 16440@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 13:04:46 -0500 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N1700M00DRQB500@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for 16440@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 20:04:38 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N1700MEUE7Q5BA0@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 20:04:38 +0200 (IST) Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 20:04:47 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#16780: 24.2.91; Emacs crash when C-c C-c on captured item In-reply-to: <86lhx8u886.fsf@somewhere.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Sebastien Vauban Message-id: <831tz070w0.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT References: <86sirhspex.fsf@somewhere.org> <83ob2590nf.fsf@gnu.org> <86mwhpv41s.fsf@somewhere.org> <83wqgt7862.fsf@gnu.org> <86a9dpv3go.fsf@somewhere.org> <83txbx77ev.fsf@gnu.org> <861tz1v2p6.fsf@somewhere.org> <83r47176os.fsf@gnu.org> <86lhx8u886.fsf@somewhere.org> X-Spam-Score: 2.3 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > From: "Sebastien Vauban" > Cc: 16440@debbugs.gnu.org, rgm@gnu.org > Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 09:37:45 +0100 > > >> > What image types do you have available in the problematic binary? > >> > This could be some incompatibility between the image libraries against > >> > which Dani built his binary and the DLLs you have installed on your > >> > system. See README.W32 and/or nt/INSTALL for the details. > >> > >> This is mainly on specific faces (not all, just a minority) not being > >> applied... > > > > Your screencast shows a black-and-white Gnu head. Is that still a > > problem? > > The Gnu head is with an orange background (#FF8C00). See > http://screencast.com/t/s6sWP3Nsc. [...] Content analysis details: (2.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.179.55.169 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 1.3 GAPPY_SUBJECT Subject: contains G.a.p.p.y-T.e.x.t X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16440 Cc: 16440@debbugs.gnu.org, rgm@gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.3 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > From: "Sebastien Vauban" > Cc: 16440@debbugs.gnu.org, rgm@gnu.org > Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 09:37:45 +0100 > > >> > What image types do you have available in the problematic binary? > >> > This could be some incompatibility between the image libraries against > >> > which Dani built his binary and the DLLs you have installed on your > >> > system. See README.W32 and/or nt/INSTALL for the details. > >> > >> This is mainly on specific faces (not all, just a minority) not being > >> applied... > > > > Your screencast shows a black-and-white Gnu head. Is that still a > > problem? > > The Gnu head is with an orange background (#FF8C00). See > http://screencast.com/t/s6sWP3Nsc. [...] Content analysis details: (2.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.179.55.169 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 1.3 GAPPY_SUBJECT Subject: contains G.a.p.p.y-T.e.x.t > From: "Sebastien Vauban" > Cc: 16440@debbugs.gnu.org, rgm@gnu.org > Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 09:37:45 +0100 > > >> > What image types do you have available in the problematic binary? > >> > This could be some incompatibility between the image libraries against > >> > which Dani built his binary and the DLLs you have installed on your > >> > system. See README.W32 and/or nt/INSTALL for the details. > >> > >> This is mainly on specific faces (not all, just a minority) not being > >> applied... > > > > Your screencast shows a black-and-white Gnu head. Is that still a > > problem? > > The Gnu head is with an orange background (#FF8C00). See > http://screencast.com/t/s6sWP3Nsc. It is still mono-color, which isn't right. > That seems to be the invert of what it should (as specified in the > Leuven theme): > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > `(gnus-splash ((,class (:foreground "#FF8C00")))) > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- That's gnus-splash, not Emacs splash, right? Or am I missing something? > > Then please tell what does evaluating the following produce > > in "emacs -Q": > > > > (mapcar (lambda (elt) > > (list (car elt) (image-type-available-p (car elt)))) > > dynamic-library-alist) > > See http://screencast.com/t/SmhmZ629B: > > ╭──── > │ ((xpm nil) (png nil) (tiff nil) (jpeg nil) (gif nil) (svg nil) > │ (gdk-pixbuf nil) (glib nil) (gobject nil) (gnutls nil) (libxml2 nil) > │ (zlib nil)) > ╰──── You don't have any image libraries available. If that bothers you, read README.W32 or nt/INSTALL. > >> See http://screencast.com/t/m2urFNhsSrN for a comparison, with all > >> parameters identical (same config file, same theme file), but the > >> version of the Emacs binary... > > > > What faces? Can you provide a simple, small, self-contained test > > case? > > New screenshot: http://screencast.com/t/LDKtOSOB. > > Test file: > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > * Code block > > #+begin_src emacs-lisp > ;; the above line must be displayed as `org-block-begin-line' > (message "echo") ; a line of code, such as this one, is > ; displayed as `org-block-background' > ;; the line below this one must be displayed as `org-block-end-line' > #+end_src > > * Mail contents > > #+begin_verse > The "borders" of this block must be displayed as `org-block-begin/end-line'. > > The "inside" must be displayed as `org-verse'... > > Foo > Bar > Baz > #+end_verse > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- OK, but what should one do with this file, starting with "emacs -Q", to reproduce the problem? The screenshot only shows the results, not what you did to achieve them. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 18 13:52:11 2014 Received: (at 16440) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Feb 2014 18:52:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58872 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WFpm6-0002ms-SR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 13:52:11 -0500 Received: from dd5e0353a.access.telenet.be ([213.224.53.58]:34277 helo=mail.missioncriticalit.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WFpm4-0002mU-1r for 16440@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 13:52:08 -0500 Received: from MUNDANEUM.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me (unknown [10.10.4.62]) by mail.missioncriticalit.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA9A1500014; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 19:52:00 +0100 (CET) From: "Sebastien Vauban" To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#16780: 24.2.91; Emacs crash when C-c C-c on captured item Organization: Sebastien Vauban References: <86sirhspex.fsf@somewhere.org> <83ob2590nf.fsf@gnu.org> <86mwhpv41s.fsf@somewhere.org> <83wqgt7862.fsf@gnu.org> <86a9dpv3go.fsf@somewhere.org> <83txbx77ev.fsf@gnu.org> <861tz1v2p6.fsf@somewhere.org> <83r47176os.fsf@gnu.org> <86lhx8u886.fsf@somewhere.org> <831tz070w0.fsf@gnu.org> X-Url: Under construction... X-Archive: encrypt Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 19:51:48 +0100 In-Reply-To: <831tz070w0.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 18 Feb 2014 20:04:47 +0200") Message-ID: <86ioscw8xn.fsf@somewhere.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (windows-nt) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 3.2 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: "Sebastien Vauban" >> Cc: 16440@debbugs.gnu.org, rgm@gnu.org >> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 09:37:45 +0100 >> >> >> > What image types do you have available in the problematic binary? >> >> > This could be some incompatibility between the image libraries against >> >> > which Dani built his binary and the DLLs you have installed on your >> >> > system. See README.W32 and/or nt/INSTALL for the details. >> >> >> >> This is mainly on specific faces (not all, just a minority) not being >> >> applied... >> > >> > Your screencast shows a black-and-white Gnu head. Is that still a >> > problem? >> >> The Gnu head is with an orange background (#FF8C00). See >> http://screencast.com/t/s6sWP3Nsc. > > It is still mono-color, which isn't right. > >> That seems to be the invert of what it should (as specified in the >> Leuven theme): >> >> --88--- >> `(gnus-splash ((,class (:foreground "#FF8C00")))) >> --88--- > > That's gnus-splash, not Emacs splash, right? Or am I missing > something? [...] Content analysis details: (3.2 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.3 RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL RBL: Relay in RNBL, https://senderscore.org/blacklistlookup/ [213.224.53.58 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com] 0.7 SPF_NEUTRAL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (neutral) 1.3 GAPPY_SUBJECT Subject: contains G.a.p.p.y-T.e.x.t X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16440 Cc: 16440@debbugs.gnu.org, rgm@gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 3.2 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: "Sebastien Vauban" >> Cc: 16440@debbugs.gnu.org, rgm@gnu.org >> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 09:37:45 +0100 >> >> >> > What image types do you have available in the problematic binary? >> >> > This could be some incompatibility between the image libraries against >> >> > which Dani built his binary and the DLLs you have installed on your >> >> > system. See README.W32 and/or nt/INSTALL for the details. >> >> >> >> This is mainly on specific faces (not all, just a minority) not being >> >> applied... >> > >> > Your screencast shows a black-and-white Gnu head. Is that still a >> > problem? >> >> The Gnu head is with an orange background (#FF8C00). See >> http://screencast.com/t/s6sWP3Nsc. > > It is still mono-color, which isn't right. > >> That seems to be the invert of what it should (as specified in the >> Leuven theme): >> >> --88--- >> `(gnus-splash ((,class (:foreground "#FF8C00")))) >> --88--- > > That's gnus-splash, not Emacs splash, right? Or am I missing > something? [...] Content analysis details: (3.2 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.3 RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL RBL: Relay in RNBL, https://senderscore.org/blacklistlookup/ [213.224.53.58 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com] 0.7 SPF_NEUTRAL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (neutral) 1.3 GAPPY_SUBJECT Subject: contains G.a.p.p.y-T.e.x.t Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: "Sebastien Vauban" >> Cc: 16440@debbugs.gnu.org, rgm@gnu.org >> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 09:37:45 +0100 >>=20 >> >> > What image types do you have available in the problematic binary? >> >> > This could be some incompatibility between the image libraries agai= nst >> >> > which Dani built his binary and the DLLs you have installed on your >> >> > system. See README.W32 and/or nt/INSTALL for the details. >> >>=20 >> >> This is mainly on specific faces (not all, just a minority) not being >> >> applied... >> > >> > Your screencast shows a black-and-white Gnu head. Is that still a >> > problem? >>=20 >> The Gnu head is with an orange background (#FF8C00). See >> http://screencast.com/t/s6sWP3Nsc. > > It is still mono-color, which isn't right. > >> That seems to be the invert of what it should (as specified in the >> Leuven theme): >>=20 >> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- >> `(gnus-splash ((,class (:foreground "#FF8C00")))) >> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > That's gnus-splash, not Emacs splash, right? Or am I missing > something? OK, right, I've confonded both. Because Gnus splash doesn't look right either. Regarding the Emacs splash, yes, I still have it in black-and-white. >> > Then please tell what does evaluating the following produce >> > in "emacs -Q": >> > >> > (mapcar (lambda (elt) >> > (list (car elt) (image-type-available-p (car elt)))) >> > dynamic-library-alist) >>=20 >> See http://screencast.com/t/SmhmZ629B: >>=20 >> =E2=95=AD=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 >> =E2=94=82 ((xpm nil) (png nil) (tiff nil) (jpeg nil) (gif nil) (svg ni= l) >> =E2=94=82 (gdk-pixbuf nil) (glib nil) (gobject nil) (gnutls nil) (libx= ml2 nil) >> =E2=94=82 (zlib nil)) >> =E2=95=B0=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 > > You don't have any image libraries available. If that bothers you, > read README.W32 or nt/INSTALL. I'll do. >> >> See http://screencast.com/t/m2urFNhsSrN for a comparison, with all >> >> parameters identical (same config file, same theme file), but the >> >> version of the Emacs binary... >> > >> > What faces? Can you provide a simple, small, self-contained test >> > case? >>=20 >> New screenshot: http://screencast.com/t/LDKtOSOB. >>=20 >> Test file: >>=20 >> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- >> * Code block >>=20 >> #+begin_src emacs-lisp >> ;; the above line must be displayed as `org-block-begin-line' >> (message "echo") ; a line of code, such as this o= ne, is >> ; displayed as `org-block-backgr= ound' >> ;; the line below this one must be displayed as `org-block-end-line' >> #+end_src >>=20 >> * Mail contents >>=20 >> #+begin_verse >> The "borders" of this block must be displayed as `org-block-begin/end-li= ne'. >>=20 >> The "inside" must be displayed as `org-verse'... >>=20 >> Foo >> Bar >> Baz >> #+end_verse >> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > OK, but what should one do with this file, starting with "emacs -Q", > to reproduce the problem? The screenshot only shows the results, not > what you did to achieve them. As stated in the beginning of the thread, simply launch a minimal Emacs file (see http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D16440#10), and open the above test file, for you to reproduce the problem. Best regards, Seb --=20 Sebastien Vauban From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Feb 20 11:35:15 2014 Received: (at 16440) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Feb 2014 16:35:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33818 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WGWad-0000tv-6e for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 11:35:12 -0500 Received: from mtaout26.012.net.il ([80.179.55.182]:45400) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WGWaZ-0000tR-8L for 16440@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 11:35:08 -0500 Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout26.012.net.il by mtaout26.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N1A00H00Z67J500@mtaout26.012.net.il> for 16440@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:33:18 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout26.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N1A00E39ZBI3A40@mtaout26.012.net.il>; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:33:18 +0200 (IST) Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:35:15 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#16780: 24.2.91; Emacs crash when C-c C-c on captured item In-reply-to: <86ioscw8xn.fsf@somewhere.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Sebastien Vauban , Bastien Message-id: <831tyx68u4.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86sirhspex.fsf@somewhere.org> <83ob2590nf.fsf@gnu.org> <86mwhpv41s.fsf@somewhere.org> <83wqgt7862.fsf@gnu.org> <86a9dpv3go.fsf@somewhere.org> <83txbx77ev.fsf@gnu.org> <861tz1v2p6.fsf@somewhere.org> <83r47176os.fsf@gnu.org> <86lhx8u886.fsf@somewhere.org> <831tz070w0.fsf@gnu.org> <86ioscw8xn.fsf@somewhere.org> X-Spam-Score: 2.3 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > From: "Sebastien Vauban" > Cc: 16440@debbugs.gnu.org, rgm@gnu.org > Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 19:51:48 +0100 > > >> >> See http://screencast.com/t/m2urFNhsSrN for a comparison, with all > >> >> parameters identical (same config file, same theme file), but the > >> >> version of the Emacs binary... > >> > > >> > What faces? Can you provide a simple, small, self-contained test > >> > case? > >> > >> New screenshot: http://screencast.com/t/LDKtOSOB. > >> > >> Test file: > >> > >> --88--- > >> * Code block > >> > >> #+begin_src emacs-lisp > >> ;; the above line must be displayed as `org-block-begin-line' > >> (message "echo") ; a line of code, such as this one, is > >> ; displayed as `org-block-background' > >> ;; the line below this one must be displayed as `org-block-end-line' > >> #+end_src > >> > >> * Mail contents > >> > >> #+begin_verse > >> The "borders" of this block must be displayed as `org-block-begin/end-line'. > >> > >> The "inside" must be displayed as `org-verse'... > >> > >> Foo > >> Bar > >> Baz > >> #+end_verse > >> --88--- > > > > OK, but what should one do with this file, starting with "emacs -Q", > > to reproduce the problem? The screenshot only shows the results, not > > what you did to achieve them. > > As stated in the beginning of the thread, simply launch a minimal Emacs > file (see http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=16440#10), and > open the above test file, for you to reproduce the problem. [...] Content analysis details: (2.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 1.3 GAPPY_SUBJECT Subject: contains G.a.p.p.y-T.e.x.t X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16440 Cc: 16440@debbugs.gnu.org, rgm@gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.3 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > From: "Sebastien Vauban" > Cc: 16440@debbugs.gnu.org, rgm@gnu.org > Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 19:51:48 +0100 > > >> >> See http://screencast.com/t/m2urFNhsSrN for a comparison, with all > >> >> parameters identical (same config file, same theme file), but the > >> >> version of the Emacs binary... > >> > > >> > What faces? Can you provide a simple, small, self-contained test > >> > case? > >> > >> New screenshot: http://screencast.com/t/LDKtOSOB. > >> > >> Test file: > >> > >> --88--- > >> * Code block > >> > >> #+begin_src emacs-lisp > >> ;; the above line must be displayed as `org-block-begin-line' > >> (message "echo") ; a line of code, such as this one, is > >> ; displayed as `org-block-background' > >> ;; the line below this one must be displayed as `org-block-end-line' > >> #+end_src > >> > >> * Mail contents > >> > >> #+begin_verse > >> The "borders" of this block must be displayed as `org-block-begin/end-line'. > >> > >> The "inside" must be displayed as `org-verse'... > >> > >> Foo > >> Bar > >> Baz > >> #+end_verse > >> --88--- > > > > OK, but what should one do with this file, starting with "emacs -Q", > > to reproduce the problem? The screenshot only shows the results, not > > what you did to achieve them. > > As stated in the beginning of the thread, simply launch a minimal Emacs > file (see http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=16440#10), and > open the above test file, for you to reproduce the problem. [...] Content analysis details: (2.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 1.3 GAPPY_SUBJECT Subject: contains G.a.p.p.y-T.e.x.t > From: "Sebastien Vauban" > Cc: 16440@debbugs.gnu.org, rgm@gnu.org > Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 19:51:48 +0100 > > >> >> See http://screencast.com/t/m2urFNhsSrN for a comparison, with all > >> >> parameters identical (same config file, same theme file), but the > >> >> version of the Emacs binary... > >> > > >> > What faces? Can you provide a simple, small, self-contained test > >> > case? > >> > >> New screenshot: http://screencast.com/t/LDKtOSOB. > >> > >> Test file: > >> > >> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > >> * Code block > >> > >> #+begin_src emacs-lisp > >> ;; the above line must be displayed as `org-block-begin-line' > >> (message "echo") ; a line of code, such as this one, is > >> ; displayed as `org-block-background' > >> ;; the line below this one must be displayed as `org-block-end-line' > >> #+end_src > >> > >> * Mail contents > >> > >> #+begin_verse > >> The "borders" of this block must be displayed as `org-block-begin/end-line'. > >> > >> The "inside" must be displayed as `org-verse'... > >> > >> Foo > >> Bar > >> Baz > >> #+end_verse > >> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > > > OK, but what should one do with this file, starting with "emacs -Q", > > to reproduce the problem? The screenshot only shows the results, not > > what you did to achieve them. > > As stated in the beginning of the thread, simply launch a minimal Emacs > file (see http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=16440#10), and > open the above test file, for you to reproduce the problem. If you reload the theme after visiting the Org file, those faces change their looks to what you expect. This seems to be the consequence of the change described in NEWS like this: *** Face specs set via Custom themes now replace the `defface' spec rather than inheriting from it (as do face specs set via Customize). Org uses org-copy-face to define the faces that you show in your screencast, and org-copy-face assumes the face it inherits from already exists. But loading a theme now doesn't create the faces, it only prepares the data for when the face will be created. So :inherit in org-copy-face doesn't do what you expect. I guess either some change is needed in how themes are handled, or org-copy-face needs to change to follow suit. (CC to Bastien for that.) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Mar 24 13:54:16 2014 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Mar 2014 17:54:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47942 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WS94h-0002hn-Kc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 13:54:15 -0400 Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:44352) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WS94e-0002hc-Hc for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 13:54:13 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N2Y00K00BSQ5R00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 19:54:11 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N2Y00KXKCE81I30@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 19:54:09 +0200 (IST) Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 19:53:59 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: Processed (with 1 errors): Re: bug#17085: No dark backgrounds in git emacs In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: control@debbugs.gnu.org (GNU bug tracker automated control server) Message-id: <83d2hb1o08.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83ha6n1ojt.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) severity 17085 important merge 17085 16694 thanks From unknown Thu Jun 19 14:04:28 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 11:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator