GNU bug report logs -
#16439
[feature request] Highlighting of strings within Info buffers
Previous Next
Full log
Message #35 received at 16439 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> From: Juri Linkov <juri <at> jurta.org>
> Cc: drew.adams <at> oracle.com, ruediger <at> c-plusplus.de, 16439 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, sva-news <at> mygooglest.com
> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 09:54:39 +0200
>
> >> Most optional features in Emacs are grouped into "packages".
> >>
> >> Should "packages" be highlighted as a string. Of course not.
> >
> > Why not? This particular example is produced from @dfn in Texinfo,
> > which should emphasize its argument. In the printed version
> > "packages" is typeset in slanted typeface (and without the quotes).
>
> It makes sense to emphasize either 1) using quotes and no additional
> highlighting or 2) using italic without the quotes, but not both styles
> (italic and quotes) at the same time.
I agree, and didn't say anything to the contrary. I told about the
slant typeface as an evidence that what came out of @dfn should be
emphasized in some way.
> >> There is no additional emphasis on quotations in books.
> >
> > But we are not talking about books, are we? We are talking about Info
> > manuals, which are mostly documentation of software.
>
> Ideally, the look of on-line documentation should not differ from
> the printed version.
We are not talking about ideals.
> But actually I see no much need in replacing Texinfo as the source format.
> As for the output format, we could try to migrate in the direction of HTML.
> However, HTML has its own problems (no index, slow rendering, etc.)
Indeed, and I wasn't asking to switch.
This was only about emphasizing quoted strings in Info manuals.
This bug report was last modified 4 years and 247 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.