GNU bug report logs -
#16304
Upcoming clang-3.4 apparently miscompiles coreutils.
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
My previous reply didn’t have Bill’s correct email.
On Dec 31, 2013, at 11:42 AM, Andrew Trick <atrick <at> apple.com> wrote:
>
> On Dec 31, 2013, at 11:39 AM, Markus Trippelsdorf <markus <at> trippelsdorf.de> wrote:
>
>> On 2013.12.31 at 11:12 -0800, Andrew Trick wrote:
>>>
>>> On Dec 30, 2013, at 1:47 PM, Markus Trippelsdorf <markus <at> trippelsdorf.de> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2013.12.30 at 18:47 +0000, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>>>>> On 12/30/2013 12:32 PM, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
>>>>>> coreutils-8.22 build with clang-3.4 doesn't copy permissions correctly:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> markus <at> x4 tmp % touch test1
>>>>>> markus <at> x4 tmp % chmod 600 test1
>>>>>> markus <at> x4 tmp % ls -al test1
>>>>>> -rw------- 1 markus markus 0 Dec 30 13:25 test1
>>>>>> markus <at> x4 tmp % /var/tmp/coreutils-8.22/src/cp test1 test2
>>>>>> markus <at> x4 tmp % ls -al test2
>>>>>> ---------- 1 markus markus 0 Dec 30 13:25 test2
>>>>>> markus <at> x4 tmp %
>>>>>
>>>>> Ouch.
>>>>>
>>>>> Note as part of the 8.22 release process
>>>>> I did verify that `make check` passed with
>>>>> clang-3.3-3.fc20.x86_64
>>>>>
>>>>> I've again verified that clang-3.3 passes your test above.
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you pinpoint the erroneous code?
>>>>> It does seem like a clang regression TBH.
>>>>
>>>> Started with LLVM r192750 (Enable MI Sched for x86).
>>>> I've opened a LLVM bug here:
>>>> http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=18346
>>>>
>>>> (I will try to come up with a testcase after the holidays)
>>>
>>> To determine whether a bug exists in MI scheduler pass (or downstream) you can do this:
>>> -mllvm -enable-misched=false.
>>>
>>> Duncan committed a post-3.4 fix, r197503, for a varargs bug exposed by
>>> changes to the SD scheduling policy.
>>
>> Yes, r197503 fixes the issue. Would be nice to get the fix applied
>> before 3.4 gets released...
>
> Yep, it would be nice. But the fix was considered too late 2 weeks ago, so it’s even less likely now. I don’t think there’s any way to rerun validation at this point. I’m copying Bill who is the authority.
>
> -Andy
This bug report was last modified 6 years and 270 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.