From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Dec 29 21:55:59 2013 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Dec 2013 02:55:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51213 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VxT1K-0002kA-BK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 21:55:58 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56720) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VxT1G-0002jz-OM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 21:55:56 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VxT1F-0000W9-Mu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 21:55:54 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:60742) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VxT1F-0000W5-Ju for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 21:55:53 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58441) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VxT1E-0003OJ-Mw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 21:55:53 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VxT1D-0000Vs-Jz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 21:55:52 -0500 Received: from mail-qa0-x233.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c00::233]:46295) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VxT1D-0000Vl-Eq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 21:55:51 -0500 Received: by mail-qa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id o15so10327582qap.17 for ; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 18:55:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=0p7145ykRDHkl3FlkWG/NMgGU1TkxHQUm1dih3XJO0E=; b=w9M3eCOR8wSCSeGP+9k9WFQqoP3RLTZ5K8DvtUU4mppNwIknMWmnJZv15zJ5RlARra hhHCf6tPSvDrYxjHD8QRAnTjn5M1eYpaDJCOMti4AxC7tz/s0Wy5koJ4Ska9pv9RF7Lb 6AwMR6f9gUFYdmLa6Ir12HnAegDlmSg6R7fk+Wx5xBwkrrNT0d+b6tUthBpaMf2SXrL3 kWZwnvEwotbhxzEUgUEKculpzOUbuwavitPJeosN2D2XA63Mk10S45aBYtcMXUcH/icv gCGA46yrbNaeXwJn5SOAj5q4fiykSgO8AF11FkURsLRJ2Xgn/DXTWZGyDiWjMWJmUvN4 lRog== X-Received: by 10.49.73.135 with SMTP id l7mr107246232qev.28.1388372150300; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 18:55:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from marvin ([2601:1:8b00:519:71fd:17b3:47ca:ff74]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id z16sm63680598qab.3.2013.12.29.18.55.48 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 29 Dec 2013 18:55:49 -0800 (PST) From: Christoph To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 24.3.50; Customize settings for color scheme don't take effect Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2013 19:55:29 -0700 Message-ID: <877gan9hem.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -3.8 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.8 (---) I am using a custom colorscheme (solarized-theme from marmalade repo). It is configurable via `customize' to affect font sizes etc. When configured via `customize' the settings don't have have any effect. I verified the variable values manually with `C-h v' and it shows the values have been changed to the expected values. The behavior of the color scheme does not reflect the new values though. When configuring the settings by explicitly setting them via `setq' in my `init.el' the color scheme behaves correctly. Is there possibly an issue with the order of enabling color schemes and loading settings? In GNU Emacs 24.3.50.4 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.4.2) of 2013-12-29 on marvin Bzr revision: 115805 eggert@cs.ucla.edu-20131229181845-k1v59prceft2aagp Windowing system distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.11103000 System Description: Linux Mint 13 Maya From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Sep 04 17:02:32 2020 Received: (at 16298) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Sep 2020 21:02:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40913 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kEIqu-0007F1-Fh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 17:02:32 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f43.google.com ([209.85.221.43]:35515) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kEIqs-0007En-4S for 16298@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 17:02:30 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f43.google.com with SMTP id e16so8576596wrm.2 for <16298@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 14:02:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=VOFt9+tm1CpVmsYWAeroyJwi5JK5nSNV8kpA1Yw7+fU=; b=YzjE1QpiMk7Fgo+3PrVPxWTtFOLYx64DZTJmPxQT4jCKkf53fPy5rqwrbXjjHMie2r DQgSB74zPFOo4tSOnVNIViSUKM+SiVAjTGEyFsYGTtcFSSyJU8guKU8IDweUsxZ76OfL m3+SwQi2sLm/R7wWK/qGyhqbngyROwIEF6YfKPI7WxqevlHtdltVpL7oCMEGOFIEN9qS lkCqCQzzFTZZgJy/VhBXiyEW3ZTdOcX1G/5hrsbmNCjb1H34KkfIKxEA8l1+vHEvwtZX hTNy/YvZ0UftNxfXZGJ41WfUXembWSdaaalM8/Fh/63Spk4dDZX2pOigESmfyve6YBbD h8CA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=VOFt9+tm1CpVmsYWAeroyJwi5JK5nSNV8kpA1Yw7+fU=; b=H0iszo4PXGSZm66geBXO01fF4qySC5rdgxAviyNBoGlb769mav5dtN3HSdTnccX82W BXqy+NpkMmrA5pI/3JPj3G6AKJkgfRkzimWNCbpeNSQFfkL8wCovTx+9/ywg6dmOXHAd 9bHnDxxVzlHLFd7npDZZCZ0P+H89JEtwHkY4auUibCqiSwDA1xrdCo4oM/2/uGbQpE7v Ag2yLNi6197HEm1eQBwHxeBm/E2ZZ4fWDius5aLfe7JridfFFLqSPhpStOyGxLccGOUI ppthcy7nZOD7OqJ7o+habzUQpHUZZW3G+kAYNlFqzseUHXnEvdiV/judRUr+yP7XzJ9x gfeQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533EThy3QSiTCST456Cp/w8P0rgsP+ey+xin7iZK7t1hlD3m48rw EjR34Qo8X7f0ndNvTbcaVKsGEKq+0ne86A8gcFA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx/6LX2zKuIhfEc0D7HACMqc8McD0Y7zZw3isBJBkzuZE8JHvgFNVKXYau7pEDi/P/o0+QdKi463J4KU+BuCVI= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5111:: with SMTP id s17mr9299094wrt.70.1599253344146; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 14:02:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Mauro Aranda Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2020 18:02:12 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#16298: 24.3.50; Customize settings for color scheme don't take effect To: Christoph Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007bdb2105ae832fde" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16298 Cc: 16298@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --0000000000007bdb2105ae832fde Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Christoph writes: > I am using a custom colorscheme (solarized-theme from marmalade > repo). It is configurable via `customize' to affect font sizes etc. > > When configured via `customize' the settings don't have have any > effect. I verified the variable values manually with `C-h v' and it > shows the values have been changed to the expected values. The behavior > of the color scheme does not reflect the new values though. > > When configuring the settings by explicitly setting them via `setq' in > my `init.el' the color scheme behaves correctly. > > Is there possibly an issue with the order of enabling color schemes and > loading settings? > Hello Christoph. Unfortunately, your bug report didn't get an answer when you reported it. Has something like this happened lately? We would need more information to proceed with this bug report. --0000000000007bdb2105ae832fde Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Christoph <csch= ol2112@gmail.com> writes:

> I am using a custom colorschem= e (solarized-theme from marmalade
> repo). It is configurable via `cu= stomize' to affect font sizes etc.
>
> When configured via = `customize' the settings don't have have any
> effect. I veri= fied the variable values manually with `C-h v' and it
> shows the= values have been changed to the expected values. The behavior
> of t= he color scheme does not reflect the new values though.
>
> Whe= n configuring the settings by explicitly setting them via `setq' in
= > my `init.el' the color scheme behaves correctly.
>
> I= s there possibly an issue with the order of enabling color schemes and
&= gt; loading settings?
>

Hello Christoph.

Unfortunately,= your bug report didn't get an answer when you reported
it.

H= as something like this happened lately? We would need more information
t= o proceed with this bug report.
--0000000000007bdb2105ae832fde-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Sep 04 17:40:23 2020 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Sep 2020 21:40:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40953 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kEJRW-00087G-SP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 17:40:22 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f45.google.com ([209.85.221.45]:36760) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kEJRV-000871-6l for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 17:40:21 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f45.google.com with SMTP id z1so8735299wrt.3 for ; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 14:40:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=QM4l69op4h8NHvDzENk0n9y5YX2ka15zJPklaF4LsVY=; b=d8r4etgjFwnFrfaqClHJYkq198hl1u1yIq0O3nKT/R1jcIJMpDS1XrcpU0ReSkTb08 KtyeJY8+Ua0MZmr48s9Ov0zlS9btYUgl8kzT52wcTc7jjRoZQ8yQ8z/yxNGvuZBMAAff G88e+KYoFYF6SOFFMpqkhEZj+QcEo2Zp8hHSgjjJa+MmwBHHmD3rC9JwT2rCHOIyyNM+ BuN4NaNHXnsV9RX+kQFdK35YqCxkF1iP8sCxQA0yal491TU+xd9XYyfZFj4sq5TYdfZ7 JaJ+ULlidkuZOcpOrLLKe/0T7rXSIyilE2VeCKN/QF692irKxW4CUmUQnVwd8vqEc446 OLcg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=QM4l69op4h8NHvDzENk0n9y5YX2ka15zJPklaF4LsVY=; b=ciCJUKXUHOgbj340vNrCTsFQlwjRIN6Vgb+VpMwgU7CAa1pgBPgICnzrrLEJ1nShEk zDGgRSxeEX2O6M8uUjSkKlT7GY+34kkyk7paDwsVskfCE1HJ9uQ0mCSzSQbmKQMlhwvs seX/YryuNxm5FTr/HDDJ2nGOEOC0E9TWBA9amLlgcuk0z4l7P6Jp4lsdqgP+A/o9SXc6 G9SJhjwEyD4XdcGBqXpjU41NcSXjXAQ6skHUQSUAaJ0GHmO3jKA3/Yp+WL/Je4RFd5/a kfXxehILqC3agDtbJijn+bixqfdz1l4IlbHVgv2+sgByjT3px34c/vCgaVQqNuHmw4kA BWug== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533z8DxQIRpdOweRhj1T1tbqeOde5ESr9l95qUJu2yBaLsV/r0fl uYuKSz3wauSD+Knj9vspmd/Gseeke1it525HmMnp0EvRjVfvYA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwIwngN9HYDl9RRb53K8DlomoVmIEUhhnaDQqD88Gu0HY9aBtjk5AR9yP6pU+AudCWe0IOIJyYzkbg6B+9JT1M= X-Received: by 2002:adf:9f10:: with SMTP id l16mr10171184wrf.77.1599255614867; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 14:40:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Mauro Aranda Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2020 18:40:03 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d44c0905ae83b6c3" X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: tags 16298 + moreinfo quit tags 16298 + moreinfo quit Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (maurooaranda[at]gmail.com) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.221.45 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.221.45 listed in list.dnswl.org] 2.0 BLANK_SUBJECT Subject is present but empty X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) --000000000000d44c0905ae83b6c3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" tags 16298 + moreinfo quit --000000000000d44c0905ae83b6c3 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
tags 16298 + moreinfo
quit

--000000000000d44c0905ae83b6c3-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Nov 05 18:56:46 2020 Received: (at 16298) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Nov 2020 23:56:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54514 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kap7V-00006k-Sb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2020 18:56:46 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f45.google.com ([209.85.221.45]:43400) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kap7U-00006P-82 for 16298@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2020 18:56:44 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f45.google.com with SMTP id g12so3695726wrp.10 for <16298@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 05 Nov 2020 15:56:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=0pa0I07xbP5EnjEvVVo6X9/LkOMwzpkA5l5GKiBItIM=; b=cEmol5bjAAQqdY6w9oKBV010NStZgZaHcl17+YxRc6xEOe5ta58KeE7wrXVBDvoB7h fgVdKGwSRtngzaIU1/qMhD/KUJVXAXOhK5ykh3SxG6TOcmCiCJB/B0jEDuSmVYPNfJ4p FSN9DAzUjJ2leJU1pYYJZhx1YR3GZnruaUSJo0DEwMY4IAmUTfB23oq/2niNxwiQec8l 06Bl8BVKuzahi4oKauZM/fE3mssUWmogY/K/6H6TtsMOYf+RgwciTT2ZPfG29/EkL8J1 J+rlCAnI2bzjQVBFNsQNMFoJUSm5hF/mFlRGL8CljN0eDGcBIQK09CRWZHDchGW+ZFpy UMKA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=0pa0I07xbP5EnjEvVVo6X9/LkOMwzpkA5l5GKiBItIM=; b=hyEiT2umUVZpHjnevfnr4CemJQDOWFNrpAWivf+5Hdjal/kVMp8or39Nmb5MNVMxWx RszA7fvyT//nw3gEPu4EYN1FCPGc7vDM6+gEPQPxYlXHbxRCmGbE7JB9DyS8f3QvY9jR Ag+wkyJpHcQm/N8sYH0y/EXlYxkCspmXSOtqk43+j5lwaUTrkbaQdLUXR+Z14CZKreNL ZVKc62/GwylqudwO7DO9T9PeKzbgaiGPLF5uFbSIikpz15I7rCJehejuA354wV6v/xR7 O2F3LpEYJ/nKEEb1tamdyVRiQ1xZ8ckq5/I/93kgOBFRHoUlFcMK/ondWr8WKByDnDru PcJQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533rz0qXGkehKlqKm+kV0DgjSmvKz+B2wr/bJl/5muiDwmeinPVZ mZO/Fld0tjJd2ktCInHa7nhW+B+HwksqcxX/2P0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyDwyWCipl93hoU0M/fAasb9d1nqjcywQ27Itv4oM/2wSjgjW8inIiDuhHjIGuPODbujA5jkJWAJYaYIv7r2JY= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:69d1:: with SMTP id s17mr5981792wrw.77.1604620598335; Thu, 05 Nov 2020 15:56:38 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Mauro Aranda Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2020 20:56:26 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#16298: 24.3.50; Customize settings for color scheme don't take effect To: Christoph Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c35d4905b364d869" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16298 Cc: 16298@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --000000000000c35d4905b364d869 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" close 16298 quit Mauro Aranda writes: > Christoph writes: > >> I am using a custom colorscheme (solarized-theme from marmalade >> repo). It is configurable via `customize' to affect font sizes etc. >> >> When configured via `customize' the settings don't have have any >> effect. I verified the variable values manually with `C-h v' and it >> shows the values have been changed to the expected values. The behavior >> of the color scheme does not reflect the new values though. >> >> When configuring the settings by explicitly setting them via `setq' in >> my `init.el' the color scheme behaves correctly. >> >> Is there possibly an issue with the order of enabling color schemes and >> loading settings? >> > > Hello Christoph. > > Unfortunately, your bug report didn't get an answer when you reported > it. > > Has something like this happened lately? We would need more information > to proceed with this bug report. This was 2 months ago, and there was no response. Without more information, it doesn't seem possible to make progress with this bug report so I'm closing it. If this is still an issue, reply to this email CCing 16298@debbugs.gnu.org and we can reopen the bug, if needed. --000000000000c35d4905b364d869 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
close 16298
quit


Mauro Aranda <maurooaranda@gmail.com> writes:
<= br>> Christoph <cschol2112@gm= ail.com> writes:
>
>> I am using a custom colorscheme= (solarized-theme from marmalade
>> repo). It is configurable via = `customize' to affect font sizes etc.
>>
>> When conf= igured via `customize' the settings don't have have any
>>= effect. I verified the variable values manually with `C-h v' and it>> shows the values have been changed to the expected values. The be= havior
>> of the color scheme does not reflect the new values thou= gh.
>>
>> When configuring the settings by explicitly set= ting them via `setq' in
>> my `init.el' the color scheme b= ehaves correctly.
>>
>> Is there possibly an issue with t= he order of enabling color schemes and
>> loading settings?
>= ;>
>
> Hello Christoph.
>
> Unfortunately, your = bug report didn't get an answer when you reported
> it.
>> Has something like this happened lately? We would need more informat= ion
> to proceed with this bug report.

This was 2 months ago, = and there was no response.=C2=A0 Without more
information, it doesn'= t seem possible to make progress with this bug
report so I'm closing= it.=C2=A0 If this is still an issue, reply to this
email CCing 16298@debbugs.gnu.org and we can reop= en the bug, if needed.
--000000000000c35d4905b364d869-- From unknown Sun Jun 22 11:45:41 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2020 12:24:08 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator