Subject: bug#16211: eww should support multiple *eww* buffers

From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 18:38:08 +0100

Ivan Shmakov <[email-masked]> writes:

>>>>>> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <[email-masked]> writes:
>>>>>> Ivan Shmakov <[email-masked]> writes:
>
>  >> The problem is that trying to M-x eww, or to follow a link, in such
>  >> a renamed buffer, results in the target document still being
>  >> rendered in the *eww* buffer.
>
>  > This has now been fixed on the trunk.
>
> 	Not quite.  Please consider the patch MIMEd.

Thanks; applied.

> 	I’d also prefer for the name of the default EWW buffer to be
> 	customizable (another patch MIMEd), but that’s another story.

I don't think that needs to be a variable.  If you want a different
name, you can write a hook function.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no