GNU bug report logs -
#1621
Please move cperl micro-docs to top of the cperl-mode.el file
Previous Next
Reported by: "Jason A. Spiro" <jasonspiro4 <at> gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 05:20:03 UTC
Severity: wishlist
Tags: fixed
Fixed in version 28.1
Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Forwarded to eye.el.why.aye.zee@cee.pee.aye.en.dot.org.invalid
Full log
Message #90 received at 1621 <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com (full text, mbox):
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 04:10:57AM +0200, era eriksson wrote:
> I do think it makes sense to keep it in the micro-docs. If nothing
> else, it's easy to refer newcomers to it, and even if you did manage to
> somehow set it up on your own, you might want to review the "official"
> way to do it, perhaps while idly browsing the micro-docs looking for
> neat stuff you didn't originally understand how to set up.
>
> Another thing I've been meaning to propose would be for cperl-mode to
> offer to install itself into your .emacs when you invoke it for the
> first time, sort of like how (put 'dangerous-command 'disabled nil)
> occasionally gets added to your .emacs after asking for permission.
> (IIRC narrow-to-region is one of these "dangerous" commands, and some of
> the horizontal scrolling commands which I never use except by mistake.)
Myself, I would hate it if it were like this: supposed I'm annoyed by
this "feature" - should it also ask whether to put a command into
.emacs which would disable this question? ;-)
> Do you think it would be appropriate to remove the +wontfix tag from
> this bug?
I do not know what "the +wontfix" means. The situation is as in "I
considered your suggestions, I appreciated your suggestions, and I
even mentioned possibly reconsidering your suggestions in my TODO
files". ;-)
Yours,
Ilya
This bug report was last modified 4 years and 280 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.