From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 20 16:39:24 2013 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Dec 2013 21:39:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60508 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vu7n2-0000qj-3P for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 16:39:24 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50753) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vu7mx-0000qW-Sh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 16:39:20 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vu7mn-0002Oz-K0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 16:39:19 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:33615) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vu7mn-0002Ov-Gr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 16:39:09 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52413) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vu7me-00053G-U8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 16:39:09 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vu7mV-0002Mg-Bg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 16:39:00 -0500 Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:39612) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vu7mV-0002Mc-2M for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 16:38:51 -0500 Received: from acsinet21.oracle.com (acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id rBKLcn3d003427 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 21:38:50 GMT Received: from userz7021.oracle.com (userz7021.oracle.com [156.151.31.85]) by acsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rBKLcmWW029395 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 21:38:49 GMT Received: from abhmp0013.oracle.com (abhmp0013.oracle.com [141.146.116.19]) by userz7021.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rBKLcmJ4011056 for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 21:38:48 GMT MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 13:38:47 -0800 (PST) From: Drew Adams To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.8 (707110) [OL 12.0.6680.5000 (x86)] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Source-IP: acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) Backtrace: 011f90c2 011f9134 010edc19 0115fe24 010e9bab 0108856c 0100e6c5 0100e1a8 0108f611 0117e030 011be773 0117e812 0117e26c 0117cb98 0117884c 011788b4 0117f394 011be816 0117e812 0117e26c 0117d591 0117dac6 0117835c 0117d0d8 0117884c 01179fd7 0117ca06 0117884c 01178799 0117ca06 0117884c 0117eb41 0117e33f 0117d591 0117df20 011be773 0117e812 0117e26c 0117d591 0117cb98 0117884c 0117eb41 0117e33f 011be773 0117e812 0117e26c 011be773 0117e812 0117e26c 011be773 0117e812 0117e26c 011be773 0117e812 0117e26c 011be773 0117e812 0117e26c 0117d591 0117df20 011be773 0117e812 ... In GNU Emacs 24.3.50.1 (i686-pc-mingw32) of 2013-12-16 on ODIEONE Bzr revision: 115543 rudalics@gmx.at-20131216095844-lbjh5yerk6ff0tm7 Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 6.1.7601 Configured using: `configure --prefix=3D/c/Devel/emacs/binary --enable-checking=3Dyes,glyphs 'CFLAGS=3D-O0 -g3' LDFLAGS=3D-Lc:/Devel/emacs/lib CPPFLAGS=3D-Ic:/Devel/emacs/include' From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 20 16:54:00 2013 Received: (at 16207) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Dec 2013 21:54:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60520 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vu819-0001Gf-Ck for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 16:54:00 -0500 Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:31486) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vu816-0001GW-De for 16207@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 16:53:57 -0500 Received: from acsinet21.oracle.com (acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id rBKLrsnc017344 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for <16207@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 21:53:55 GMT Received: from aserz7021.oracle.com (aserz7021.oracle.com [141.146.126.230]) by acsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rBKLrsYx003541 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <16207@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 21:53:54 GMT Received: from abhmp0013.oracle.com (abhmp0013.oracle.com [141.146.116.19]) by aserz7021.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rBKLrsML003536 for <16207@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 21:53:54 GMT MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 13:53:53 -0800 (PST) From: Drew Adams To: 16207@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: RE: bug#16207: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt References: In-Reply-To: X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.8 (707110) [OL 12.0.6680.5000 (x86)] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Source-IP: acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237] X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16207 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) This is with emacs -Q. I was in the debugger, and I widened the frame usin= g the mouse. That caused the crash. Twice now - same backtrace. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 20 17:41:50 2013 Received: (at 16207) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Dec 2013 22:41:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60556 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vu8lR-0002fT-Hi for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 17:41:49 -0500 Received: from mail-ea0-f180.google.com ([209.85.215.180]:56396) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vu8lO-0002fI-Sp for 16207@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 17:41:47 -0500 Received: by mail-ea0-f180.google.com with SMTP id f15so1326697eak.11 for <16207@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 14:41:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=BBM4gDXAXulekdK9tC4oDC89ygKyF7ogBmjGZPeFNNU=; b=LW22esZPHYfMHs2A8ppXOA0blICdMywDhbLCcs0xlksEyJhLktajxMtTinIpsvBAgC LFhjvLv45v1MvEgn0eOI8q+0L9O0vcNoV20I5hncd9W6q+78fDNuNao1ZEr05fmhxVth Od8Lju0dcf+rOssGfaELh7uReQlOy0ozG8SXOjfse05CaK78yN+kFfZXjlDtp/TDL+53 skxtvvFuXc8lL221x9RwfGvHAB+2wMFb9vypsSa4bPQ7Aa15QoUixwUUfEkprUfZljen ljNDpPoJpkApCsNYYFDmo6bbZ8Sjyg4xfVMoxCup6xw61RK+zzkC2F/qdjeTjXuT+Gb2 dH3w== X-Received: by 10.14.149.139 with SMTP id x11mr7695901eej.35.1387579305847; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 14:41:45 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.209.69 with HTTP; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 14:41:05 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Juanma Barranquero Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 23:41:05 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#16207: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt To: Drew Adams Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16207 Cc: 16207@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) ?? ??:0 Ffile_system_info at w32fns.c:7436 Ffile_system_info at w32fns.c:7452 GLYPH_CODE_P at dispextern.h:1851 mark_object at alloc.c:5996 face_for_overlay_string at xfaces.c:6068 window_loop at window.c:2761 change_frame_size_1 at dispnew.c:5570 do_pending_window_change at dispnew.c:5413 Frecenter at window.c:5577 eval_sub at eval.c:2137 copy_executable_and_dump_data at unexw32.c:605 Fapply at eval.c:2316 eval_sub at eval.c:2189 xsignal2 at eval.c:1599 Fcall_interactively at callint.c:774 Fcall_interactively at callint.c:774 Ffuncall at eval.c:2778 copy_executable_and_dump_data at unexw32.c:615 Fapply at eval.c:2316 eval_sub at eval.c:2189 Fcommandp at eval.c:1850 grow_specpdl at eval.c:2021 Fcall_interactively at callint.c:679 maybe_call_debugger at eval.c:1714 Fcall_interactively at callint.c:774 Fsetq at eval.c:542 Fsignal at eval.c:1536 Fcall_interactively at callint.c:774 Fcall_interactively at callint.c:775 Fsignal at eval.c:1536 Fcall_interactively at callint.c:774 Frun_hook_with_args_until_success at eval.c:2422 eval_sub at eval.c:2199 Fcommandp at eval.c:1850 eval_sub at eval.c:2129 copy_executable_and_dump_data at unexw32.c:605 Fapply at eval.c:2316 eval_sub at eval.c:2189 Fcommandp at eval.c:1850 xsignal2 at eval.c:1599 Fcall_interactively at callint.c:774 Frun_hook_with_args_until_success at eval.c:2422 eval_sub at eval.c:2199 copy_executable_and_dump_data at unexw32.c:605 Fapply at eval.c:2316 eval_sub at eval.c:2189 copy_executable_and_dump_data at unexw32.c:605 Fapply at eval.c:2316 eval_sub at eval.c:2189 copy_executable_and_dump_data at unexw32.c:605 Fapply at eval.c:2316 eval_sub at eval.c:2189 copy_executable_and_dump_data at unexw32.c:605 Fapply at eval.c:2316 eval_sub at eval.c:2189 copy_executable_and_dump_data at unexw32.c:605 Fapply at eval.c:2316 eval_sub at eval.c:2189 Fcommandp at eval.c:1850 eval_sub at eval.c:2129 copy_executable_and_dump_data at unexw32.c:605 Fapply at eval.c:2316 ?? ??:0 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Dec 21 04:38:36 2013 Received: (at 16207) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Dec 2013 09:38:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60806 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VuJ12-0006h4-97 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 04:38:36 -0500 Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:41117) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VuJ0y-0006gr-C9 for 16207@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 04:38:34 -0500 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MY500M00H9FSB00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 16207@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 11:38:30 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MY500LV5HG6XEP0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 11:38:30 +0200 (IST) Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 11:38:17 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#16207: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Drew Adams Message-id: <83fvpma6ie.fsf@gnu.org> References: X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16207 Cc: 16207@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) > Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 13:38:47 -0800 (PST) > From: Drew Adams > > > > Backtrace: > 011f90c2 Where are my first 2 lines in the file, which show the exception and its address? They come before the "Backtrace" part. Were they absent, or did you omit them from your post? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Dec 21 04:47:43 2013 Received: (at 16207) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Dec 2013 09:47:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60810 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VuJ9r-000713-83 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 04:47:43 -0500 Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:48662) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VuJ9n-00070m-L1 for 16207@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 04:47:40 -0500 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MY500500HOAV100@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 16207@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 11:46:46 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MY5005YYHTYNAA0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 11:46:46 +0200 (IST) Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 11:46:33 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#16207: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Drew Adams Message-id: <83eh56a64m.fsf@gnu.org> References: X-Spam-Score: 2.2 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 13:53:53 -0800 (PST) > From: Drew Adams > > This is with emacs -Q. I was in the debugger, and I widened the frame using the mouse. That caused the crash. Twice now - same backtrace. [...] Content analysis details: (2.2 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.179.55.166 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net [Blocked - see ] 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16207 Cc: 16207@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.2 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 13:53:53 -0800 (PST) > From: Drew Adams > > This is with emacs -Q. I was in the debugger, and I widened the frame using the mouse. That caused the crash. Twice now - same backtrace. [...] Content analysis details: (2.2 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.179.55.166 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net [Blocked - see ] 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) > Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 13:53:53 -0800 (PST) > From: Drew Adams > > This is with emacs -Q. I was in the debugger, and I widened the frame using the mouse. That caused the crash. Twice now - same backtrace. Can you please show a recipe starting with "emacs -Q"? The backtrace makes no sense at all: it shows call sequences that don't exist in the sources. So a reproducible recipe is our only hope. Please be as detailed in the recipe as you can. E.g., please tell exactly how did you "widen the frame with the mouse" -- which portion of the frame did you drag and in what direction. Thanks. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Dec 21 11:23:00 2013 Received: (at 16207) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Dec 2013 16:23:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33406 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VuPKN-0003Ym-Vq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 11:23:00 -0500 Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:22063) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VuPKL-0003Yd-UT for 16207@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 11:22:58 -0500 Received: from ucsinet21.oracle.com (ucsinet21.oracle.com [156.151.31.93]) by userp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id rBLGMueT029387 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 21 Dec 2013 16:22:57 GMT Received: from aserz7022.oracle.com (aserz7022.oracle.com [141.146.126.231]) by ucsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rBLGMtrs008770 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 21 Dec 2013 16:22:56 GMT Received: from ubhmt103.oracle.com (ubhmt103.oracle.com [156.151.24.8]) by aserz7022.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rBLGMst2005199; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 16:22:55 GMT MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 08:22:54 -0800 (PST) From: Drew Adams To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: RE: bug#16207: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt References: <> <<83fvpma6ie.fsf@gnu.org>> In-Reply-To: <<83fvpma6ie.fsf@gnu.org>> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.8 (707110) [OL 12.0.6680.5000 (x86)] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Source-IP: ucsinet21.oracle.com [156.151.31.93] X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16207 Cc: 16207@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) > > Backtrace: > > 011f90c2 >=20 > Where are my first 2 lines in the file, which show the exception and > its address? They come before the "Backtrace" part. Were they > absent, or did you omit them from your post? I posted the complete contents of the file, using `insert-file'. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Dec 21 11:27:09 2013 Received: (at 16207) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Dec 2013 16:27:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33412 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VuPOO-0003hL-L5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 11:27:09 -0500 Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:23478) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VuPOL-0003h4-TA for 16207@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 11:27:06 -0500 Received: from acsinet21.oracle.com (acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id rBLGR4aA028835 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 21 Dec 2013 16:27:04 GMT Received: from aserz7022.oracle.com (aserz7022.oracle.com [141.146.126.231]) by acsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rBLGR3J0013027 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 21 Dec 2013 16:27:04 GMT Received: from ubhmt103.oracle.com (ubhmt103.oracle.com [156.151.24.8]) by aserz7022.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rBLGR3D9010685; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 16:27:03 GMT MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <617f6b6d-0c1e-4721-bbb1-7c9fefea4bb2@default> Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 08:27:02 -0800 (PST) From: Drew Adams To: Eli Zaretskii , Drew Adams Subject: RE: bug#16207: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt References: <> <> <<83eh56a64m.fsf@gnu.org>> In-Reply-To: <<83eh56a64m.fsf@gnu.org>> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.8 (707110) [OL 12.0.6680.5000 (x86)] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Source-IP: acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237] X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16207 Cc: 16207@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) > Can you please show a recipe starting with "emacs -Q"? The backtrace > makes no sense at all: it shows call sequences that don't exist in the > sources. So a reproducible recipe is our only hope. >=20 > Please be as detailed in the recipe as you can. E.g., please tell > exactly how did you "widen the frame with the mouse" -- which portion > of the frame did you drag and in what direction. emacs -Q (Well actually, my Windows shortcut for -Q has it open a directory with Dired.) M-x load-library pp.el M-x debug-on-entry pp-eval-expression M-x pp-eval-expression global-map In debugger, hit `d' once or twice. Then grab the right frame edge and pull it to the right a few inches. Hit `d' -> crash. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Dec 21 11:54:16 2013 Received: (at 16207) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Dec 2013 16:54:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33427 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VuPod-0004Xq-1D for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 11:54:15 -0500 Received: from mail-ea0-f172.google.com ([209.85.215.172]:45180) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VuPoa-0004Xf-04 for 16207@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 11:54:12 -0500 Received: by mail-ea0-f172.google.com with SMTP id q10so1359152ead.17 for <16207@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 08:54:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=0+i+PpyC8amA/PNN1NEu4b21Aj3RexH+oCjwGcO80GI=; b=gqLWCz3tmpWamI9zSHgLkMhlOYIEcF7H+ktxL6iuEUREGivxwDg8nP6PBlKUlVljNr DF/NwfGDHYQo6aL3JOx+jeowaXe4fitv4X5J8OOYecRV3YwuAMQZU88gHDKVBW3XnpaF pQlbShENI1vGpIMj5BBhexMLnowA09ApJ4xvZ4VAClajwvH9dL7UbMGvw2ekybSFj6Oo jj1LjZwdpmdC0aH4tgVKnbyTsiY2jxGWDN+FvXwNkQVeikYPHwHqmE7u6vCFdNmSxxDv SU4AHqtm8BFtgLPtRctMccUrIsf0dubjbBnLevZVj7z7n9QE2++yNpUKpbOvp0MSeOaW MgcQ== X-Received: by 10.14.108.6 with SMTP id p6mr11238682eeg.31.1387644851091; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 08:54:11 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.209.69 with HTTP; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 08:53:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <617f6b6d-0c1e-4721-bbb1-7c9fefea4bb2@default> References: <617f6b6d-0c1e-4721-bbb1-7c9fefea4bb2@default> From: Juanma Barranquero Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 17:53:29 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#16207: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt To: Drew Adams Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16207 Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 16207@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) lisp.h:874: Emacs fatal error: assertion failed: BUFFERP (a) Breakpoint 1, terminate_due_to_signal (sig=22, backtrace_limit=2147483647) at emacs.c:351 351 signal (sig, SIG_DFL); (gdb) bt #0 terminate_due_to_signal (sig=22, backtrace_limit=2147483647) at emacs.c:351 #1 0x011615dc in die (msg=0x148b198 "BUFFERP (a)", file=0x148b10c "lisp.h", line=874) at alloc.c:6742 #2 0x010eb7fb in XBUFFER (a=58132514) at lisp.h:874 #3 0x01089e14 in run_window_configuration_change_hook (f=0x3aa1a08 <__register_frame_info+61479432>) at window.c:3257 #4 0x0100e79c in change_frame_size_1 (f=0x3aa1a08 <__register_frame_info+61479432>, new_width=824, new_height=608, pretend=false, delay=false, safe=false, pixelwise=true) at dispnew.c:5588 #5 0x0100e27f in change_frame_size (f=0x3aa1a08 <__register_frame_info+61479432>, new_width=824, new_height=608, pretend=false, delay=false, safe=false, pixelwise=true) at dispnew.c:5457 #6 0x01090ff6 in Fset_window_configuration (configuration=86847613) at window.c:6233 #7 0x0117f87f in Ffuncall (nargs=2, args=0x88db24) at eval.c:2805 #8 0x011c0344 in exec_byte_code (bytestr=58650753, vector=86847981, maxdepth=12, args_template=0, nargs=0, args=0x88de54) at bytecode.c:919 #9 0x01180061 in funcall_lambda (fun=86848077, nargs=0, arg_vector=0x88de54) at eval.c:2973 #10 0x0117fabb in Ffuncall (nargs=1, args=0x88de50) at eval.c:2854 #11 0x0117e3e7 in eval_sub (form=62132246) at eval.c:2147 #12 0x0117a078 in Fprogn (body=62132254) at eval.c:458 #13 0x0117a0e0 in unwind_body (body=62132254) at eval.c:472 #14 0x01180c08 in unbind_to (count=26, value=58132514) at eval.c:3296 #15 0x011c03e7 in exec_byte_code (bytestr=58732321, vector=58472509, maxdepth=172, args_template=512, nargs=1, args=0x88e408) at bytecode.c:941 #16 0x01180061 in funcall_lambda (fun=58472829, nargs=1, arg_vector=0x88e408) at eval.c:2973 #17 0x0117fabb in Ffuncall (nargs=2, args=0x88e404) at eval.c:2854 #18 0x0117ea0f in Fapply (nargs=2, args=0x88e404) at eval.c:2291 #19 0x0117f315 in apply1 (fn=58262082, arg=62135166) at eval.c:2578 #20 0x01179b88 in call_debugger (arg=62135166) at eval.c:322 #21 0x01179be6 in do_debug_on_call (code=58183842) at eval.c:338 #22 0x0117f61b in Ffuncall (nargs=2, args=0x88e61c) at eval.c:2759 #23 0x0117ea0f in Fapply (nargs=2, args=0x88e61c) at eval.c:2291 #24 0x0117f76f in Ffuncall (nargs=3, args=0x88e618) at eval.c:2786 #25 0x011c0344 in exec_byte_code (bytestr=60319409, vector=62168693, maxdepth=16, args_template=512, nargs=1, args=0x88e9a8) at bytecode.c:919 #26 0x01180061 in funcall_lambda (fun=61883925, nargs=1, arg_vector=0x88e9a8) at eval.c:2973 #27 0x0117fabb in Ffuncall (nargs=2, args=0x88e9a4) at eval.c:2854 #28 0x0117ea0f in Fapply (nargs=2, args=0x88e9a4) at eval.c:2291 #29 0x0117f315 in apply1 (fn=60622306, arg=62140750) at eval.c:2578 #30 0x011776de in Fcall_interactively (function=60622306, record_flag=60294018, keys=58153845) at callint.c:378 #31 0x0117f8d4 in Ffuncall (nargs=4, args=0x88ebdc) at eval.c:2812 #32 0x011c0344 in exec_byte_code (bytestr=19806545, vector=19806565, maxdepth=52, args_template=4100, nargs=2, args=0x88ef30) at bytecode.c:919 #33 0x01180061 in funcall_lambda (fun=19806525, nargs=2, arg_vector=0x88ef28) at eval.c:2973 #34 0x0117fabb in Ffuncall (nargs=3, args=0x88ef24) at eval.c:2854 #35 0x011c0344 in exec_byte_code (bytestr=19806217, vector=19806237, maxdepth=60, args_template=2052, nargs=2, args=0x88f26c) at bytecode.c:919 #36 0x01180061 in funcall_lambda (fun=19806189, nargs=2, arg_vector=0x88f264) at eval.c:2973 #37 0x0117fabb in Ffuncall (nargs=3, args=0x88f260) at eval.c:2854 #38 0x0117ede0 in Fapply (nargs=2, args=0x88f2e4) at eval.c:2344 #39 0x0117f315 in apply1 (fn=58340930, arg=60849846) at eval.c:2578 #40 0x011776de in Fcall_interactively (function=58340930, record_flag=58132514, keys=58153845) at callint.c:378 #41 0x0117f8d4 in Ffuncall (nargs=4, args=0x88f51c) at eval.c:2812 #42 0x011c0344 in exec_byte_code (bytestr=19806545, vector=19806565, maxdepth=52, args_template=4100, nargs=1, args=0x88f860) at bytecode.c:919 #43 0x01180061 in funcall_lambda (fun=19806525, nargs=1, arg_vector=0x88f85c) at eval.c:2973 #44 0x0117fabb in Ffuncall (nargs=2, args=0x88f858) at eval.c:2854 #45 0x0117f36a in call1 (fn=58178658, arg1=58340930) at eval.c:2604 #46 0x010f3c29 in command_loop_1 () at keyboard.c:1552 #47 0x0117c765 in internal_condition_case (bfun=0x10f35c5 , handlers=58183970, hfun=0x10f2e2b ) at eval.c:1344 #48 0x010f327a in command_loop_2 (ignore=58132514) at keyboard.c:1170 #49 0x0117bd12 in internal_catch (tag=58179330, func=0x10f3256 , arg=58132514) at eval.c:1108 #50 0x010f3232 in command_loop () at keyboard.c:1149 #51 0x010f29c8 in recursive_edit_1 () at keyboard.c:777 #52 0x010f2b84 in Frecursive_edit () at keyboard.c:841 #53 0x010f0d7c in main (argc=2, argv=0xbb1b20) at emacs.c:1634 Lisp Backtrace: "set-window-configuration" (0x88db28) 0x52d3248 PVEC_COMPILED "funcall" (0x88de50) "debug" (0x88e408) 0x37cb620 PVEC_COMPILED "apply" (0x88e61c) "pp-eval-expression" (0x88e9a8) "call-interactively" (0x88ebe0) "command-execute" (0x88ef28) "execute-extended-command" (0x88f264) "call-interactively" (0x88f520) "command-execute" (0x88f85c) (gdb) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Dec 21 11:56:41 2013 Received: (at 16207) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Dec 2013 16:56:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33431 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VuPqz-0004cR-5K for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 11:56:41 -0500 Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:25540) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VuPqw-0004cH-Vq for 16207@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 11:56:39 -0500 Received: from ucsinet21.oracle.com (ucsinet21.oracle.com [156.151.31.93]) by userp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id rBLGubVm016449 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 21 Dec 2013 16:56:37 GMT Received: from aserz7021.oracle.com (aserz7021.oracle.com [141.146.126.230]) by ucsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rBLGua01019159 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 21 Dec 2013 16:56:36 GMT Received: from ubhmt103.oracle.com (ubhmt103.oracle.com [156.151.24.8]) by aserz7021.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rBLGuZq8017420; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 16:56:35 GMT MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 08:56:35 -0800 (PST) From: Drew Adams To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: RE: bug#16207: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt References: <> <> <<83eh56a64m.fsf@gnu.org>> <617f6b6d-0c1e-4721-bbb1-7c9fefea4bb2@default> In-Reply-To: <617f6b6d-0c1e-4721-bbb1-7c9fefea4bb2@default> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.8 (707110) [OL 12.0.6680.5000 (x86)] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Source-IP: ucsinet21.oracle.com [156.151.31.93] X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16207 Cc: 16207@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) Here is the backtrace I got with that recipe. Dunno why the first file I i= ncluded ended with `...'. This one starts out the same, anyway. HTH. Backtrace: 011f90c2 011f9134 010edc19 0115fe24 010e9bab 0108856c 0100e6c5 0100e1a8 0108f611 0117e030 011be773 0117e812 0117e26c 0117cb98 0117884c 011788b4 0117f394 011be816 0117e812 0117e26c 0117d1c0 0117dac6 0117835c 011783ba 0117ddcc 0117d1c0 0117df20 011be773 0117e812 0117e26c 0117d1c0 0117dac6 01175eaa 0117e085 011be773 0117e812 0117e26c 011be773 0117e812 0117e26c 0117d591 0117dac6 01175eaa 0117e085 011be773 0117e812 0117e26c 0117db1b 010f1fa8 0117af2c 010f15fc 0117a4d9 010f15b4 010f0d4c 010f0f08 010ef113 010010f9 76f43366 77899f6e 77899f41 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Dec 21 12:15:22 2013 Received: (at 16207) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Dec 2013 17:15:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33443 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VuQ94-0005D4-2H for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 12:15:22 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:65417) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VuQ91-0005Cw-Qf for 16207@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 12:15:20 -0500 Received: from [62.47.35.33] ([62.47.35.33]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LjIit-1VMRyL3Sc3-00dU3z for <16207@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 18:15:18 +0100 Message-ID: <52B5CCA2.1080406@gmx.at> Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 18:15:14 +0100 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Juanma Barranquero Subject: Re: bug#16207: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt References: <617f6b6d-0c1e-4721-bbb1-7c9fefea4bb2@default> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:ATdKNlXVxBF+aoDRA+FUlu7oDUTsySPRQNs25ZVofAeYbenW6H0 8c3IntHAdDoPZheBKNxDjV78o5yB/fp2oHQy1rZDVjj5vc1w/s4ytbSU9LqVdlV6EaJ+5wb 9/shaQ76I8eXBQs2axf5dTid7jxfxGMZ5dtD5pALIL2aClepv9lN5PZu8D8ovusPnwwDfPA GpcpN70bPxTa5PquvGATw== X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16207 Cc: 16207@debbugs.gnu.org, Drew Adams X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) > Breakpoint 1, terminate_due_to_signal (sig=22, > backtrace_limit=2147483647) at emacs.c:351 > 351 signal (sig, SIG_DFL); > (gdb) bt > #0 terminate_due_to_signal (sig=22, backtrace_limit=2147483647) at emacs.c:351 > #1 0x011615dc in die (msg=0x148b198 "BUFFERP (a)", file=0x148b10c > "lisp.h", line=874) at alloc.c:6742 > #2 0x010eb7fb in XBUFFER (a=58132514) at lisp.h:874 > #3 0x01089e14 in run_window_configuration_change_hook (f=0x3aa1a08 > <__register_frame_info+61479432>) at window.c:3257 ... > "set-window-configuration" (0x88db28) The selected window doesn't have a buffer. I have no idea how to track this down. Basically, we'd have to record in some variable a triple whenever we (1) select a window, (2) delete a window, (3) kill a buffer, and check at strategic positions (e.g. as above in run_window_configuration_change_hook) whether this variable contains something fishy and put that variable's value somewhere before aborting. Tedious ... martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Dec 21 13:31:57 2013 Received: (at 16207) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Dec 2013 18:31:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33485 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VuRL9-0007lH-UM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 13:31:56 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:56036) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VuRL6-0007l1-K0 for 16207@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 13:31:53 -0500 Received: from [62.47.35.33] ([62.47.35.33]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LxPuE-1VSBx70vfe-01704k for <16207@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 19:31:51 +0100 Message-ID: <52B5DE93.4080407@gmx.at> Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 19:31:47 +0100 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Juanma Barranquero Subject: Re: bug#16207: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt References: <617f6b6d-0c1e-4721-bbb1-7c9fefea4bb2@default> <52B5CCA2.1080406@gmx.at> In-Reply-To: <52B5CCA2.1080406@gmx.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:QwQ7/jvqTNh2cBzzV/bzWta+YxgJq3jgZzRTlhq8rX7eTyRdcxo rxEUzoq9jvKfnagzzSAYY6yolgQ73bVuevL9Ql6GYDXXprW161/Yb81RFfsSh70LtVUyfOQ zePRdqzE/7c2V7OUkERdtg6uHK/QOJ/G4dqX5wiNJ1Cw7E8Jr6Dn9ohfMAcVYlLenZYgPAw 9lWaIDue1bZpR55Ex5EIw== X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16207 Cc: 16207@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) > > Breakpoint 1, terminate_due_to_signal (sig=22, > > backtrace_limit=2147483647) at emacs.c:351 > > 351 signal (sig, SIG_DFL); > > (gdb) bt > > #0 terminate_due_to_signal (sig=22, backtrace_limit=2147483647) at > emacs.c:351 > > #1 0x011615dc in die (msg=0x148b198 "BUFFERP (a)", file=0x148b10c > > "lisp.h", line=874) at alloc.c:6742 > > #2 0x010eb7fb in XBUFFER (a=58132514) at lisp.h:874 > > #3 0x01089e14 in run_window_configuration_change_hook (f=0x3aa1a08 > > <__register_frame_info+61479432>) at window.c:3257 > ... > > "set-window-configuration" (0x88db28) Which is obviously bug#16051 which I've been now able to reproduce for the first time. And it's definitively the toolbar-window which causes the crash. And I can get it crash or loop forever (no C-g exit) on my Gtk build too. martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Dec 21 13:39:21 2013 Received: (at 16207) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Dec 2013 18:39:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33510 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VuRSK-00081M-Jy for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 13:39:20 -0500 Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:56699) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VuRSI-000819-65 for 16207@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 13:39:19 -0500 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MY6003005W5RA00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 16207@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 20:39:12 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MY6003B36H6O450@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 20:39:06 +0200 (IST) Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 20:38:54 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#16207: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Drew Adams Message-id: <8338lm9hhd.fsf@gnu.org> References: X-Spam-Score: 2.2 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 08:22:54 -0800 (PST) > From: Drew Adams > Cc: 16207@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > Backtrace: > > > 011f90c2 > > > > Where are my first 2 lines in the file, which show the exception and > > its address? They come before the "Backtrace" part. Were they > > absent, or did you omit them from your post? > > I posted the complete contents of the file, using `insert-file'. [...] Content analysis details: (2.2 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.179.55.172 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net [Blocked - see ] 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16207 Cc: 16207@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.2 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 08:22:54 -0800 (PST) > From: Drew Adams > Cc: 16207@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > Backtrace: > > > 011f90c2 > > > > Where are my first 2 lines in the file, which show the exception and > > its address? They come before the "Backtrace" part. Were they > > absent, or did you omit them from your post? > > I posted the complete contents of the file, using `insert-file'. [...] Content analysis details: (2.2 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.179.55.172 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net [Blocked - see ] 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) > Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 08:22:54 -0800 (PST) > From: Drew Adams > Cc: 16207@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > Backtrace: > > > 011f90c2 > > > > Where are my first 2 lines in the file, which show the exception and > > its address? They come before the "Backtrace" part. Were they > > absent, or did you omit them from your post? > > I posted the complete contents of the file, using `insert-file'. Too bad. Thanks. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Dec 21 13:45:59 2013 Received: (at 16207) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Dec 2013 18:45:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33528 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VuRYj-0008Dv-CY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 13:45:58 -0500 Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:57804) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VuRYf-0008Dh-Vu for 16207@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 13:45:55 -0500 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MY6009006RDGF00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 16207@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 20:45:51 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MY6009VH6SCCQ40@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 20:45:49 +0200 (IST) Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 20:45:36 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#16207: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt In-reply-to: <52B5CCA2.1080406@gmx.at> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: martin rudalics Message-id: <83zjnu82lr.fsf@gnu.org> References: <617f6b6d-0c1e-4721-bbb1-7c9fefea4bb2@default> <52B5CCA2.1080406@gmx.at> X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16207 Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, 16207@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) > Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 18:15:14 +0100 > From: martin rudalics > Cc: 16207@debbugs.gnu.org > > > Breakpoint 1, terminate_due_to_signal (sig=22, > > backtrace_limit=2147483647) at emacs.c:351 > > 351 signal (sig, SIG_DFL); > > (gdb) bt > > #0 terminate_due_to_signal (sig=22, backtrace_limit=2147483647) at emacs.c:351 > > #1 0x011615dc in die (msg=0x148b198 "BUFFERP (a)", file=0x148b10c > > "lisp.h", line=874) at alloc.c:6742 > > #2 0x010eb7fb in XBUFFER (a=58132514) at lisp.h:874 > > #3 0x01089e14 in run_window_configuration_change_hook (f=0x3aa1a08 > > <__register_frame_info+61479432>) at window.c:3257 > ... > > "set-window-configuration" (0x88db28) > > The selected window doesn't have a buffer. I have no idea how to track > this down. Maybe one way is to think how could this happen, ever. How can such window even exist? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Dec 21 13:46:44 2013 Received: (at 16207) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Dec 2013 18:46:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33533 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VuRZT-0008G0-4U for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 13:46:43 -0500 Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:58356) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VuRZO-0008Fi-VD for 16207@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 13:46:40 -0500 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MY6003006POUR00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 16207@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 20:46:37 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MY6003AZ6TPVA00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 20:46:37 +0200 (IST) Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 20:46:25 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#16207: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Juanma Barranquero Message-id: <83y53e82ke.fsf@gnu.org> References: <617f6b6d-0c1e-4721-bbb1-7c9fefea4bb2@default> X-Spam-Score: 2.2 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > From: Juanma Barranquero > Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 17:53:29 +0100 > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 16207@debbugs.gnu.org > > lisp.h:874: Emacs fatal error: assertion failed: BUFFERP (a) > > Breakpoint 1, terminate_due_to_signal (sig=22, > backtrace_limit=2147483647) at emacs.c:351 > 351 signal (sig, SIG_DFL); > (gdb) bt > #0 terminate_due_to_signal (sig=22, backtrace_limit=2147483647) at emacs.c:351 > #1 0x011615dc in die (msg=0x148b198 "BUFFERP (a)", file=0x148b10c > "lisp.h", line=874) at alloc.c:6742 [...] Content analysis details: (2.2 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.179.55.172 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net [Blocked - see ] 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16207 Cc: 16207@debbugs.gnu.org, drew.adams@oracle.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.2 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > From: Juanma Barranquero > Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 17:53:29 +0100 > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 16207@debbugs.gnu.org > > lisp.h:874: Emacs fatal error: assertion failed: BUFFERP (a) > > Breakpoint 1, terminate_due_to_signal (sig=22, > backtrace_limit=2147483647) at emacs.c:351 > 351 signal (sig, SIG_DFL); > (gdb) bt > #0 terminate_due_to_signal (sig=22, backtrace_limit=2147483647) at emacs.c:351 > #1 0x011615dc in die (msg=0x148b198 "BUFFERP (a)", file=0x148b10c > "lisp.h", line=874) at alloc.c:6742 [...] Content analysis details: (2.2 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.179.55.172 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net [Blocked - see ] 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) > From: Juanma Barranquero > Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 17:53:29 +0100 > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 16207@debbugs.gnu.org > > lisp.h:874: Emacs fatal error: assertion failed: BUFFERP (a) > > Breakpoint 1, terminate_due_to_signal (sig=22, > backtrace_limit=2147483647) at emacs.c:351 > 351 signal (sig, SIG_DFL); > (gdb) bt > #0 terminate_due_to_signal (sig=22, backtrace_limit=2147483647) at emacs.c:351 > #1 0x011615dc in die (msg=0x148b198 "BUFFERP (a)", file=0x148b10c > "lisp.h", line=874) at alloc.c:6742 Thanks. What does "xtype" say about this 'a' that was expected to be a buffer? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Dec 21 13:51:09 2013 Received: (at 16207) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Dec 2013 18:51:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33544 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VuRdk-0008PX-2m for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 13:51:08 -0500 Received: from mail-ea0-f173.google.com ([209.85.215.173]:53610) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VuRdg-0008PL-R5 for 16207@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 13:51:05 -0500 Received: by mail-ea0-f173.google.com with SMTP id o10so1635646eaj.32 for <16207@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 10:51:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=El701gIB1/44aFhfWOXi8jKTgs4zjA3HlLA69fbKrxg=; b=nbzhNzEFPxn7dU7IilstvRhL0h/Tsl1SA1IGDppWDGHz/uyrcp0lBDdjtj+KgXGvNl DUtdqPPZ9fFz8ZLalfzEXfo+BDGksb9Rhxq76nTAidoj7cRvsd0DJ7OObVzQ0FXuB6lo XYgmKVBP1eQEnGdgThwaStSu7ic07t1TSJ9eVgDAxlXMkekloQx5fwocKsD7qw/V3SqG yfe496GeipoFk7brRq88u/Hmuf/rS6ATZusYZ8yAQbvR3v1YVBECpGK0vdZClnu4vWNF cC4zn4aBtB+Zj8DOCBzW6ehoQJniNGXIL/SUtN+f7rv+BKFeO/MJKadRexw7p5PhzXBL eBfw== X-Received: by 10.14.108.6 with SMTP id p6mr11616526eeg.31.1387651863927; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 10:51:03 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.209.69 with HTTP; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 10:50:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83y53e82ke.fsf@gnu.org> References: <617f6b6d-0c1e-4721-bbb1-7c9fefea4bb2@default> <83y53e82ke.fsf@gnu.org> From: Juanma Barranquero Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 19:50:23 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#16207: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt To: Eli Zaretskii Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16207 Cc: 16207@debbugs.gnu.org, Drew Adams X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 7:46 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > What does "xtype" say about this 'a' that was expected to be a buffer? (gdb) frame 2 #2 0x010eb7fb in XBUFFER (a=58132514) at lisp.h:874 874 eassert (BUFFERP (a)); (gdb) p a $1 = 58132514 (gdb) xtype Lisp_Symbol (gdb) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Dec 21 13:52:48 2013 Received: (at 16207) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Dec 2013 18:52:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33548 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VuRfM-0008TD-41 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 13:52:48 -0500 Received: from mail-ee0-f50.google.com ([74.125.83.50]:48535) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VuRfJ-0008T3-96 for 16207@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 13:52:45 -0500 Received: by mail-ee0-f50.google.com with SMTP id c41so1617574eek.37 for <16207@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 10:52:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=p3QEa5rrvzCBASmURbiP2MDF4Lm93odgQHaDsncmbz0=; b=0vyzfkgj3QTz9kfAzjbt+Kc0CG9wIu/x55tPqCcFl0OR7mHmsdyjzsKDPHcjrw9lg0 rDMjeP9jQUwS7GNV2CzsH3araiQY8T1weag4qFMm61yfROZt7jsySk6rWh32cQofZptD 7PlNvSJJqb1o6NZXw0u3bl5IdLphuAhw/OpVG9UPPmVPXn/Bh0+CArRKvTEXXmRuvlgz GtXkzwrG+OFHNjbQLp90NB4nR03PRFOX4Nqu644RbzROVauc/nJRyksC1hBAiJCYJNQe 563gFXW1Bze5oHiXi/JF3ajbnkO4H57R5fSkiLesBEOsiiezJGOEmKUTDLaCDcMLXf4x b8ew== X-Received: by 10.15.56.7 with SMTP id x7mr11633530eew.43.1387651964500; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 10:52:44 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.209.69 with HTTP; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 10:52:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <617f6b6d-0c1e-4721-bbb1-7c9fefea4bb2@default> <83y53e82ke.fsf@gnu.org> From: Juanma Barranquero Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 19:52:04 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#16207: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt To: Eli Zaretskii Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16207 Cc: 16207@debbugs.gnu.org, Drew Adams X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Juanma Barranquero wrote: > Lisp_Symbol nil, BTW J From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Dec 21 13:58:31 2013 Received: (at 16207) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Dec 2013 18:58:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33560 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VuRks-0000Cs-NB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 13:58:31 -0500 Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:61109) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VuRkq-0000Cg-8U for 16207@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 13:58:29 -0500 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MY60030073ZZ000@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 16207@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 20:58:26 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MY60048L7DD1M00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 20:58:25 +0200 (IST) Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 20:58:13 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#16207: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt In-reply-to: <52B5DE93.4080407@gmx.at> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: martin rudalics Message-id: <83vbyi820q.fsf@gnu.org> References: <617f6b6d-0c1e-4721-bbb1-7c9fefea4bb2@default> <52B5CCA2.1080406@gmx.at> <52B5DE93.4080407@gmx.at> X-Spam-Score: 2.2 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 19:31:47 +0100 > From: martin rudalics > Cc: 16207@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > Breakpoint 1, terminate_due_to_signal (sig=22, > > > backtrace_limit=2147483647) at emacs.c:351 > > > 351 signal (sig, SIG_DFL); > > > (gdb) bt > > > #0 terminate_due_to_signal (sig=22, backtrace_limit=2147483647) at > > emacs.c:351 > > > #1 0x011615dc in die (msg=0x148b198 "BUFFERP (a)", file=0x148b10c > > > "lisp.h", line=874) at alloc.c:6742 > > > #2 0x010eb7fb in XBUFFER (a=58132514) at lisp.h:874 > > > #3 0x01089e14 in run_window_configuration_change_hook (f=0x3aa1a08 > > > <__register_frame_info+61479432>) at window.c:3257 > > ... > > > "set-window-configuration" (0x88db28) > > Which is obviously bug#16051 which I've been now able to reproduce for > the first time. And it's definitively the toolbar-window which causes > the crash. [...] Content analysis details: (2.2 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.179.55.172 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net [Blocked - see ] 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16207 Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, 16207@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.2 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 19:31:47 +0100 > From: martin rudalics > Cc: 16207@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > Breakpoint 1, terminate_due_to_signal (sig=22, > > > backtrace_limit=2147483647) at emacs.c:351 > > > 351 signal (sig, SIG_DFL); > > > (gdb) bt > > > #0 terminate_due_to_signal (sig=22, backtrace_limit=2147483647) at > > emacs.c:351 > > > #1 0x011615dc in die (msg=0x148b198 "BUFFERP (a)", file=0x148b10c > > > "lisp.h", line=874) at alloc.c:6742 > > > #2 0x010eb7fb in XBUFFER (a=58132514) at lisp.h:874 > > > #3 0x01089e14 in run_window_configuration_change_hook (f=0x3aa1a08 > > > <__register_frame_info+61479432>) at window.c:3257 > > ... > > > "set-window-configuration" (0x88db28) > > Which is obviously bug#16051 which I've been now able to reproduce for > the first time. And it's definitively the toolbar-window which causes > the crash. [...] Content analysis details: (2.2 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.179.55.172 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net [Blocked - see ] 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) > Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 19:31:47 +0100 > From: martin rudalics > Cc: 16207@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > Breakpoint 1, terminate_due_to_signal (sig=22, > > > backtrace_limit=2147483647) at emacs.c:351 > > > 351 signal (sig, SIG_DFL); > > > (gdb) bt > > > #0 terminate_due_to_signal (sig=22, backtrace_limit=2147483647) at > > emacs.c:351 > > > #1 0x011615dc in die (msg=0x148b198 "BUFFERP (a)", file=0x148b10c > > > "lisp.h", line=874) at alloc.c:6742 > > > #2 0x010eb7fb in XBUFFER (a=58132514) at lisp.h:874 > > > #3 0x01089e14 in run_window_configuration_change_hook (f=0x3aa1a08 > > > <__register_frame_info+61479432>) at window.c:3257 > > ... > > > "set-window-configuration" (0x88db28) > > Which is obviously bug#16051 which I've been now able to reproduce for > the first time. And it's definitively the toolbar-window which causes > the crash. But then the XBUFFER thing is bogus, because the tool-bar window never has a buffer. Its 'contents' field is always nil. But how did that window get to become the "selected" window?? It should never be that, I think. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Dec 21 13:59:19 2013 Received: (at 16207) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Dec 2013 18:59:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33564 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VuRle-0000Ed-T0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 13:59:19 -0500 Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:60640) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VuRlb-0000ET-9a for 16207@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 13:59:15 -0500 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MY6009007COJT00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 16207@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 20:59:14 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MY6008797EPNIS0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 20:59:14 +0200 (IST) Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 20:59:01 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#16207: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt In-reply-to: <83y53e82ke.fsf@gnu.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83txe281ze.fsf@gnu.org> References: <617f6b6d-0c1e-4721-bbb1-7c9fefea4bb2@default> <83y53e82ke.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16207 Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, 16207@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) > Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 20:46:25 +0200 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: 16207@debbugs.gnu.org > > > #1 0x011615dc in die (msg=0x148b198 "BUFFERP (a)", file=0x148b10c > > "lisp.h", line=874) at alloc.c:6742 > > Thanks. What does "xtype" say about this 'a' that was expected to be > a buffer? I'm guessing it's a symbol nil. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Dec 21 14:40:55 2013 Received: (at 16207) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Dec 2013 19:40:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33591 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VuSPu-0001a8-Qs for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 14:40:55 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:55672) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VuSPs-0001Zz-JE for 16207@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 14:40:53 -0500 Received: from [62.47.35.33] ([62.47.35.33]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MLNeQ-1Vv0Nd2gUc-000b92 for <16207@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 20:40:51 +0100 Message-ID: <52B5EEBD.8020807@gmx.at> Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 20:40:45 +0100 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#16207: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt References: <617f6b6d-0c1e-4721-bbb1-7c9fefea4bb2@default> <52B5CCA2.1080406@gmx.at> <52B5DE93.4080407@gmx.at> <83vbyi820q.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <83vbyi820q.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:Qjm2CwUTw/2yK29T+MjfIkoi8oBDnK4P8GMoWHfl9yzg6PYW9Nv 9o+le1Pr4Mw4WsBK2xLquK2QgnEWBKSVh/JHWRQqkeh4R6ivxQDstw5Z4TDO3OLje+uaQdY gmGIJ5Yy0DldeS1aLT3fQF6oiMagcFpjFL9SAa0mAQJakLY3oibqfTdj9oQEaiBgQw1XlW+ 5g5ocjgYmk6HX+BwrgQ2A== X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16207 Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, 16207@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) >> Which is obviously bug#16051 which I've been now able to reproduce for >> the first time. And it's definitively the toolbar-window which causes >> the crash. Too silly - I sent my message to the 16207 thread and meant to send it to the 16051 one where you already remarked my missing insight. So please disregard the remarks Eli cited on top of this mail in the current thread: The toolbar window is by no means involved and neither is this bug related to bug#16051. > But then the XBUFFER thing is bogus, because the tool-bar window never > has a buffer. Its 'contents' field is always nil. If the toolbar window ended up here, something crazy would have happened indeed. martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Dec 21 14:58:58 2013 Received: (at 16207) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Dec 2013 19:58:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33601 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VuShO-00028N-4q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 14:58:58 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:52985) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VuShK-00028E-HY for 16207@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 14:58:55 -0500 Received: from [62.47.35.33] ([62.47.35.33]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MfzEP-1W6Cme2yd3-00NV3N for <16207@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 20:58:53 +0100 Message-ID: <52B5F2F9.1070802@gmx.at> Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 20:58:49 +0100 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#16207: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt References: <617f6b6d-0c1e-4721-bbb1-7c9fefea4bb2@default> <52B5CCA2.1080406@gmx.at> <83zjnu82lr.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <83zjnu82lr.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:t458SDs9yE5I8OXQofVitJ6i/rp2xhuD7FeQJrvVv0jrqU1di4Z GecDgO8fVMZBwiSYa1S6dVLStp0hb8v+xsKyF1VBTKPBlLymJqTfH55LwqryVUgKPQQWh7T Ni7Gwkr5yULgP0ExBdhxF2tdvMlJ0wYcaq9tW/K2/0MbxoRmbIHp7BhP/Qme/uZpvH/6pL/ v9LGl9y4ZLqqrsE8avCZg== X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16207 Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, 16207@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) > Maybe one way is to think how could this happen, ever. How can such > window even exist? I think I know what's causing it. But I have to do some testing before checking in a fix. In any case, don't bother about this until you hear from me. martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Dec 21 15:11:08 2013 Received: (at 16207) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Dec 2013 20:11:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33610 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VuSt9-0002ZM-Oj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 15:11:08 -0500 Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:43473) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VuSt6-0002Z8-Kc for 16207@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 15:11:05 -0500 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MY600A00AE00A00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 16207@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 22:10:25 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MY600965APDFNH0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 22:10:25 +0200 (IST) Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 22:10:13 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#16207: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt In-reply-to: <52B5F2F9.1070802@gmx.at> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: martin rudalics Message-id: <83sitm7yoq.fsf@gnu.org> References: <617f6b6d-0c1e-4721-bbb1-7c9fefea4bb2@default> <52B5CCA2.1080406@gmx.at> <83zjnu82lr.fsf@gnu.org> <52B5F2F9.1070802@gmx.at> X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16207 Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, 16207@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) > Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 20:58:49 +0100 > From: martin rudalics > CC: lekktu@gmail.com, 16207@debbugs.gnu.org > > > Maybe one way is to think how could this happen, ever. How can such > > window even exist? > > I think I know what's causing it. But I have to do some testing > before checking in a fix. Great, thanks. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Dec 22 10:37:50 2013 Received: (at 16207) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Dec 2013 15:37:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34744 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vul6D-0007xj-Ad for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 22 Dec 2013 10:37:49 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:64121) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vul67-0007xT-Hf for 16207@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 22 Dec 2013 10:37:44 -0500 Received: from [62.47.48.107] ([62.47.48.107]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M5Lmp-1VZGAr0BRf-00zWyW for <16207@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 22 Dec 2013 16:37:42 +0100 Message-ID: <52B70740.2030207@gmx.at> Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2013 16:37:36 +0100 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#16207: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt References: <617f6b6d-0c1e-4721-bbb1-7c9fefea4bb2@default> <52B5CCA2.1080406@gmx.at> <83zjnu82lr.fsf@gnu.org> <52B5F2F9.1070802@gmx.at> In-Reply-To: <52B5F2F9.1070802@gmx.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:3MIJKQYK89c11j6r8CMVRCoRQvBJio9lJ9rswS0ou+ck0HBLU2/ lHxMDBfO+MrJmKrd56QrS7J/BmxNP7PTjx13PSen9JRwuBrgOXYVsrVLW87xLG4D2d2WpMT 0hEIc+3XPWYfk7oaZT1tRl+ntrFhuJNr3eK5ShLMWOy+5xpLel8IxJkzUGukK+Pvzl23XUv zcq4bcDj+Q6NiV99t20tQ== X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16207 Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, Chong Yidong , 16207@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) > I think I know what's causing it. But I have to do some testing > before checking in a fix. Rather than spending hours to test this I checked in a fix. This way we should find out soon enough whether it breaks anything else. In this context I wonder what the variable inhibit_lisp_code stands for. Initially, it was called inhibit_window_configuration_change_hook and did exactly what its name said. Then it moved to eval.c, got its new name, but still does what it did before. So if we want this to really inihibit running Lisp code we should obey it in each and every hook (although I fail to understand why we can't bind Vrun_hooks instead). Otherwise, we should probably give it back its initial name to avoid confusions. WDYT? martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Dec 22 10:40:45 2013 Received: (at 16207) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Dec 2013 15:40:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34748 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vul93-00083l-8v for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 22 Dec 2013 10:40:45 -0500 Received: from mail-ea0-f173.google.com ([209.85.215.173]:61541) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vul8x-00083V-RU for 16207@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 22 Dec 2013 10:40:41 -0500 Received: by mail-ea0-f173.google.com with SMTP id o10so1933394eaj.4 for <16207@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 22 Dec 2013 07:40:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=gOcPCcCWpLKwuX0K6o8GCTgayuAQbRRHywhdM6yjYeQ=; b=LXVfqffkGxdUzHF5pxYrRM/0vDUyg5rKI5OFBi82dBFmhMniqAlOzNbO+yRnRbg2Sv LuqEPKmpY5UkOjsJJncZW46BqTEuKZhd1uDy+Q7hHSMHrEEtufgIklNjcotSv2T5ujGT ksnl6Q4tCOdC3tuLRZg61IHz0KHQurdJI+//1YkJJrtYUTA8aEp244v4Q6i3tBR0zA4X zL3raJ5Z3U+As6PTnCqKcYho34VZulon2X1GRxybOrUN8SiyFcQfFGlXS4SInhhnf96w 1MAfV0D0k3WXtZ1AhV3sJmhv8ArgdwFDK25sqMYpBgBqP3TuHpTBUxCWiYW60BzC3zoV 7eEA== X-Received: by 10.15.53.200 with SMTP id r48mr2229491eew.111.1387726838944; Sun, 22 Dec 2013 07:40:38 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.209.69 with HTTP; Sun, 22 Dec 2013 07:39:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <52B70740.2030207@gmx.at> References: <617f6b6d-0c1e-4721-bbb1-7c9fefea4bb2@default> <52B5CCA2.1080406@gmx.at> <83zjnu82lr.fsf@gnu.org> <52B5F2F9.1070802@gmx.at> <52B70740.2030207@gmx.at> From: Juanma Barranquero Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2013 16:39:58 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#16207: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt To: martin rudalics Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16207 Cc: 16207@debbugs.gnu.org, Drew Adams X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 4:37 PM, martin rudalics wrote: > Rather than spending hours to test this I checked in a fix. This way we > should find out soon enough whether it breaks anything else. I'm bootstrapping a new binary for Drew to try, it'll be up ASAP. J From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Dec 23 00:37:42 2013 Received: (at 16207) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Dec 2013 05:37:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35206 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VuyCy-0008Hy-87 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 00:37:41 -0500 Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:35582) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VuyCu-0008Hm-NZ for 16207@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 00:37:37 -0500 Received: from acsinet21.oracle.com (acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237]) by userp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id rBN5bYpa032301 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 23 Dec 2013 05:37:35 GMT Received: from aserz7021.oracle.com (aserz7021.oracle.com [141.146.126.230]) by acsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rBN5bXwi024405 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 23 Dec 2013 05:37:34 GMT Received: from ubhmt103.oracle.com (ubhmt103.oracle.com [156.151.24.8]) by aserz7021.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rBN5bX37024384; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 05:37:33 GMT MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <2b6df6de-7579-461d-b783-0e9542c90aac@default> Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2013 21:37:31 -0800 (PST) From: Drew Adams To: martin rudalics , Eli Zaretskii Subject: RE: bug#16207: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt References: <617f6b6d-0c1e-4721-bbb1-7c9fefea4bb2@default> <52B5CCA2.1080406@gmx.at> <83zjnu82lr.fsf@gnu.org> <52B5F2F9.1070802@gmx.at> <52B70740.2030207@gmx.at> In-Reply-To: <52B70740.2030207@gmx.at> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.8 (707110) [OL 12.0.6680.5000 (x86)] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Source-IP: acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237] X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16207 Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, Chong Yidong , 16207@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) > Rather than spending hours to test this I checked in a fix. This way we > should find out soon enough whether it breaks anything else. >=20 > In this context I wonder what the variable inhibit_lisp_code stands for. > Initially, it was called inhibit_window_configuration_change_hook and > did exactly what its name said. Then it moved to eval.c, got its new > name, but still does what it did before. So if we want this to really > inihibit running Lisp code we should obey it in each and every hook > (although I fail to understand why we can't bind Vrun_hooks instead). > Otherwise, we should probably give it back its initial name to avoid > confusions. WDYT? I tested with this version, and it seems to be fixed. Thx. In GNU Emacs 24.3.50.1 (i686-pc-mingw32) of 2013-12-22 on ODIEONE Bzr revision: 115700 xfq.free@gmail.com-20131222231942-q8ftfeg3ft2a1t83 Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 6.1.7601 Configured using: `configure --prefix=3D/c/Devel/emacs/binary --enable-checking=3Dyes,glyphs 'CFLAGS=3D-O0 -g3' CPPFLAGS=3D-Ic:/Devel/emacs/include LDFLAGS=3D-Lc:/Devel/emacs/lib' From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Dec 23 11:24:53 2013 Received: (at 16207) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Dec 2013 16:24:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36115 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vv8JI-0005ES-LW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 11:24:53 -0500 Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:52607) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vv8JE-0005EF-NH for 16207@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 11:24:49 -0500 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MY900C00P6A9V00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 16207@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 18:24:37 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MY900BGLPKYS990@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 18:24:35 +0200 (IST) Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 18:24:28 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#16207: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt In-reply-to: <52B70740.2030207@gmx.at> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: martin rudalics Message-id: <831u138rib.fsf@gnu.org> References: <617f6b6d-0c1e-4721-bbb1-7c9fefea4bb2@default> <52B5CCA2.1080406@gmx.at> <83zjnu82lr.fsf@gnu.org> <52B5F2F9.1070802@gmx.at> <52B70740.2030207@gmx.at> X-Spam-Score: 2.2 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2013 16:37:36 +0100 > From: martin rudalics > CC: lekktu@gmail.com, 16207@debbugs.gnu.org, Chong Yidong > > > I think I know what's causing it. But I have to do some testing > > before checking in a fix. > > Rather than spending hours to test this I checked in a fix. This way we > should find out soon enough whether it breaks anything else. [...] Content analysis details: (2.2 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.179.55.166 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net [Blocked - see ] 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16207 Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, cyd@gnu.org, 16207@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.2 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2013 16:37:36 +0100 > From: martin rudalics > CC: lekktu@gmail.com, 16207@debbugs.gnu.org, Chong Yidong > > > I think I know what's causing it. But I have to do some testing > > before checking in a fix. > > Rather than spending hours to test this I checked in a fix. This way we > should find out soon enough whether it breaks anything else. [...] Content analysis details: (2.2 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.179.55.166 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net [Blocked - see ] 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) > Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2013 16:37:36 +0100 > From: martin rudalics > CC: lekktu@gmail.com, 16207@debbugs.gnu.org, Chong Yidong > > > I think I know what's causing it. But I have to do some testing > > before checking in a fix. > > Rather than spending hours to test this I checked in a fix. This way we > should find out soon enough whether it breaks anything else. Thanks! > In this context I wonder what the variable inhibit_lisp_code stands for. > Initially, it was called inhibit_window_configuration_change_hook and > did exactly what its name said. Then it moved to eval.c, got its new > name, but still does what it did before. So if we want this to really > inihibit running Lisp code we should obey it in each and every hook > (although I fail to understand why we can't bind Vrun_hooks instead). > Otherwise, we should probably give it back its initial name to avoid > confusions. WDYT? If you are asking me, then there's nothing intelligent I can say about this issue: I didn't rename the variable and didn't even notice it got renamed. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Dec 23 13:44:48 2013 Received: (at 16207) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Dec 2013 18:44:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36337 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VvAUi-0001J9-Hu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 13:44:48 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:60653) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VvAUf-0001Ip-Ho for 16207@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 13:44:46 -0500 Received: from [62.47.63.246] ([62.47.63.246]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M2ts6-1Vf9FF1pvq-00sgQ8 for <16207@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 19:44:43 +0100 Message-ID: <52B88494.3070306@gmx.at> Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 19:44:36 +0100 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Juanma Barranquero Subject: Re: bug#16207: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt References: <617f6b6d-0c1e-4721-bbb1-7c9fefea4bb2@default> <52B5CCA2.1080406@gmx.at> <83zjnu82lr.fsf@gnu.org> <52B5F2F9.1070802@gmx.at> <52B70740.2030207@gmx.at> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:Y65QpXVh2HPA3RhxR9ZwmY6Oyft0O5kN1vmvyxD9idr9IKWnMnY IBUhosXWSBATKEjC4BnlFPt6L7rCK+yp7RdM6O5V1820cXEaNhbsoBfhpN0Tg2xfUTE78QO wpoXU9hw3iR1IrnOWkq+PKaCkz3wyGoz7UFvJ3GfM1mxf/uB0+1qQOZsKPpvwfAlV3uWBJ4 oEnZWHnQZ+9NERRAp9q1g== X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16207 Cc: 16207@debbugs.gnu.org, Drew Adams X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) > I'm bootstrapping a new binary for Drew to try, it'll be up ASAP. Belated thanks. martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Dec 23 13:44:55 2013 Received: (at 16207) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Dec 2013 18:44:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36340 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VvAUo-0001JX-W6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 13:44:55 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:57581) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VvAUi-0001J8-OR for 16207@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 13:44:49 -0500 Received: from [62.47.63.246] ([62.47.63.246]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MBWo2-1Vo3E93duI-00AVuo for <16207@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 19:44:48 +0100 Message-ID: <52B88499.8080006@gmx.at> Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 19:44:41 +0100 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#16207: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt References: <617f6b6d-0c1e-4721-bbb1-7c9fefea4bb2@default> <52B5CCA2.1080406@gmx.at> <83zjnu82lr.fsf@gnu.org> <52B5F2F9.1070802@gmx.at> <52B70740.2030207@gmx.at> <831u138rib.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <831u138rib.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:6qJuGXlGpS4dl3mjO+wZpVOJ6+wMdFfQdaGFkhQufvqTDZqLbN5 KLxyRWvpeg/sQK7uw3Z41eHyjhKv15pHL0yNbLj+juB8MCCc9C4o1VSUKG65aZ9B1w9/Ya2 /g5DJgG7kve3LuDjGLddwrL57dvdWDyGC8V1onD8ZE9gh+w0XPCWoiL7769w+NYSIiKbcMN /6KDT++Af/tJTxy0qL4wg== X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16207 Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, cyd@gnu.org, 16207@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) > If you are asking me, then there's nothing intelligent I can say about > this issue: I didn't rename the variable and didn't even notice it got > renamed. IIUC Chong invented the variable and renamed it. That's why I was CC-ing him. martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jan 04 09:12:25 2014 Received: (at 16207-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jan 2014 14:12:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33305 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VzRxh-0008LI-EU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jan 2014 09:12:25 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:49558) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VzRxf-0008LA-9x for 16207-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jan 2014 09:12:24 -0500 Received: from [62.47.40.146] ([62.47.40.146]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M3zG2-1V9PGu2wew-00rbeU for <16207-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 04 Jan 2014 15:12:22 +0100 Message-ID: <52C816C2.1060300@gmx.at> Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2014 15:12:18 +0100 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Drew Adams Subject: Re: bug#16207: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt References: <617f6b6d-0c1e-4721-bbb1-7c9fefea4bb2@default> <52B5CCA2.1080406@gmx.at> <83zjnu82lr.fsf@gnu.org> <52B5F2F9.1070802@gmx.at> <52B70740.2030207@gmx.at> <2b6df6de-7579-461d-b783-0e9542c90aac@default> In-Reply-To: <2b6df6de-7579-461d-b783-0e9542c90aac@default> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:IaPez1y4DCF6Km3ujoWAR/iBnHpfc1efY5E/BuqzjGgixawSnor 39fMwgSSETjixSrnOUhvbqQHhyZ1PzJOfObXTjExmdKb/KocGjquJiNlI6LxWNsFJKn66Rj mFTemFKc1dGM4cvVh+t82coibWMFsvXfKlKAoGrn1oJND5P/cmCJLyaLu6ZJNOQCsHis2jz do83jCot1/MBYZY/Nm2jA== X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16207-done Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, Eli Zaretskii , Chong Yidong , 16207-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) > I tested with this version, and it seems to be fixed. Thx. Bug closed. Thanks, martin From unknown Fri Aug 15 04:07:15 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2014 12:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator