From unknown Fri Jun 13 10:56:15 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#16173: 24.3.50; Inconsistency between goto-line an line numbering with narrowing Resent-From: Nathan Trapuzzano Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 02:49:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 16173 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 16173@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.138724849821827 (code B ref -1); Tue, 17 Dec 2013 02:49:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Dec 2013 02:48:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54742 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vskhi-0005fs-Hh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 21:48:18 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46242) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vskhc-0005fb-CW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 21:48:12 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VskhT-000136-Gs for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 21:48:08 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:35803) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VskhT-000132-Dw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 21:47:59 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47869) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VskhL-0003xi-Ub for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 21:47:59 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VskhE-00010e-EJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 21:47:51 -0500 Received: from oproxy9-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com ([69.89.24.6]:35352) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VskhE-0000w6-45 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 21:47:44 -0500 Received: (qmail 6706 invoked by uid 0); 17 Dec 2013 02:47:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO host393.hostmonster.com) (66.147.240.193) by oproxy9.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 17 Dec 2013 02:47:51 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nbtrap.com; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From; bh=D57YikzT2M753v7irS1HoXYmZOUYcP8hQ/vzrsFJhj0=; b=UCV4MkxQFqm7OhnHxZbLjtXzOfprU+y0o+yIkN/hnjCqJ8P2w7+4jquBRbRAn9x5QkRACe/F7/h+oguDbdws8saeSNwHbyoePJyBnbizijVdreh8Uh0Kz+FzNRHKhnWu; Received: from [50.90.253.209] (port=39942 helo=Nathan-GNU) by host393.hostmonster.com with esmtpsa (UNKNOWN:CAMELLIA128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vskgo-0005tN-JC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 19:47:18 -0700 From: Nathan Trapuzzano Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 21:47:08 -0500 Message-ID: <87txe88a8j.fsf@nbtrap.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Identified-User: {1585:host393.hostmonster.com:nbtrapco:nbtrap.com} {sentby:smtp auth 50.90.253.209 authed with nbtrap@nbtrap.com} X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.3 (----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.3 (----) Does it bother anyone that, with narrowing, line numbers according to linum and differ from line numbers according to `goto-line'? (goto-line widens before counting, linum doesn't.) Is changing this behavior a possibility? Perhaps it's been around too long to change it now, but what about adding a new goto-line variant? Nathan From unknown Fri Jun 13 10:56:15 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#16173: 24.3.50; Inconsistency between goto-line an line numbering with narrowing Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 03:01:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16173 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Nathan Trapuzzano Cc: 16173@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 16173-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16173.138724921223272 (code B ref 16173); Tue, 17 Dec 2013 03:01:02 +0000 Received: (at 16173) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Dec 2013 03:00:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54757 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VsktH-00063F-Mp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 22:00:12 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:54548) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VsktE-00062Q-5a for 16173@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 22:00:09 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VsktC-00060D-O3; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 22:00:07 -0500 From: Glenn Morris References: <87txe88a8j.fsf@nbtrap.com> X-Spook: Skipjack Mossad plutonium mailbomb analyzer Abbas gamma X-Ran: 8S}wC6>-t)WyL(5T*X'<~.WzlIWf*hxjF+suw1?{1Ohk%1q!@dQ(^xE):?nt^q$h|W)xwd X-Hue: black X-Attribution: GM Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 22:00:06 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87txe88a8j.fsf@nbtrap.com> (Nathan Trapuzzano's message of "Mon, 16 Dec 2013 21:47:08 -0500") Message-ID: <5zwqj4fah5.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -5.3 (-----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.3 (-----) Nathan Trapuzzano wrote: > Does it bother anyone that, with narrowing, line numbers according to > linum and differ from line numbers according to `goto-line'? http://debbugs.gnu.org/5042 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Dec 16 22:01:40 2013 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Dec 2013 03:01:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54765 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vskui-00066K-5K for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 22:01:40 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:54578) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vskug-00066C-RY for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 22:01:39 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vskug-0000bX-I7 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 22:01:38 -0500 Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 22:01:38 -0500 Message-Id: Subject: control message for bug 16173 To: X-Mailer: mail (GNU Mailutils 2.1) From: Glenn Morris X-Spam-Score: -5.5 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.5 (-----) forcemerge 5042 16173