From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Dec 14 15:19:57 2013 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Dec 2013 20:19:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50359 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vrvgr-0006dX-4c for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 15:19:57 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53367) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VrvYo-0006PG-B3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 15:11:38 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VrvYn-000738-9P for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 15:11:38 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:56153) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VrvYn-000734-5z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 15:11:37 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55089) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VrvYm-0004AB-Au for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 15:11:37 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VrvYl-00072o-Jn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 15:11:36 -0500 Received: from mail-vc0-x229.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400c:c03::229]:64528) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VrvYl-00072i-El for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 15:11:35 -0500 Received: by mail-vc0-f169.google.com with SMTP id hu19so2216154vcb.14 for ; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 12:11:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=seTiHgpPGCjFebm73UxEWQhzx1eK+D8b9Gc/JP1eg+k=; b=RzRJphXlVz2fCpZ+M896L31j9ekkO662t6VQb7qFrZBjJrd3sOCipwXHAif6x3uglV j/W1FO6MTN+k4uIb7qyZEvv2Jchmay8AG9jLIdmEeqWgOELToi6N+u1zDgliSN48S2ui igIc9uDelAXtDPvnHGFUdMCbGKo61YPaIf4byp+Pv4PV4DD6SqN2YPD8Unk2UNG2sH0/ i1PawHp7NfG/BY+/LJIY5PiWwNzYXeTin+fnLl3t1xOh23jowSSU51khCVz1CuwiJaYt uYjsPiFYDBwRY2Ly7533AWQXetk2+vw9nY6Liv0KccZbQOD2jiLXevd2N3+EQjphsAmk +iCg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.231.130 with SMTP id tg2mr3982928vdc.16.1387051894845; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 12:11:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.58.168.231 with HTTP; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 12:11:34 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 01:11:34 +0500 Message-ID: Subject: Emacs not deleting lock files when system-name is set to nil From: Micky To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0102f8327a36a604ed842f4d X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 15:19:55 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) --089e0102f8327a36a604ed842f4d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 When setting system-name to nil (should that be allowed?), Emacs forgets how to delete the lock files '.#.*' and all subsequent startups complain about lockups by old dead PIDs. >From what I get, either system-name should not be allowed to set as nil or file locks should be still deleted on exists because they still have usernames in the aliases. GNU Emacs 24.3.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.8.2) of 2013-08-07 on -mnt-storage-buildroots-staging-x86_64-eric --089e0102f8327a36a604ed842f4d Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
When setting system-name to nil (should that be allow= ed?), Emacs forgets how to delete the lock files '.#.*' and all sub= sequent startups complain about lockups by old dead PIDs.

From what I get, either system-name should not be allowed to set as ni= l or file locks should be still deleted on exists because they still have u= sernames in the aliases.

GNU Emacs 24.3.1 (x86_64-= unknown-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.8.2)
=A0of 2013-08-07 on -mnt-storage-buildroots-staging-x86_64-eric=A0
--089e0102f8327a36a604ed842f4d-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Dec 14 15:23:01 2013 Received: (at 16150) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Dec 2013 20:23:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50365 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vrvjn-0006jU-Sw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 15:23:00 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:35695) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vrvjl-0006jI-BY for 16150@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 15:22:57 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vrvjk-0003Ma-MM; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 15:22:56 -0500 From: Glenn Morris To: Micky Subject: Re: bug#16150: Emacs not deleting lock files when system-name is set to nil References: X-Spook: industrial intelligence PLO top secret JPL computer X-Ran: K8*{V"~ajaeA|e.[jFgvseeqIg^cWgo>8O'?@nLV6&GQ3c\^erVg7{9YoDH6/_z^MMdyk^ X-Hue: magenta X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Attribution: GM Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 15:22:56 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Micky's message of "Sun, 15 Dec 2013 01:11:34 +0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -5.4 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16150 Cc: 16150@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.4 (-----) Micky wrote: > When setting system-name to nil (should that be allowed?), Emacs forgets > how to delete the lock files '.#.*' and all subsequent startups complain > about lockups by old dead PIDs. I think this is a "don't do that, then". If Emacs fails to set system-name, that is a bug. If you actively set system-name to nil, that's just shooting yourself in the foot. Why did you want to do that, and what made you think it would work? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Dec 14 15:25:56 2013 Received: (at 16150) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Dec 2013 20:25:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50369 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vrvmd-0006p4-9D for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 15:25:56 -0500 Received: from mail-vc0-f178.google.com ([209.85.220.178]:61118) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vrvma-0006os-T7 for 16150@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 15:25:53 -0500 Received: by mail-vc0-f178.google.com with SMTP id lh4so2260328vcb.9 for <16150@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 12:25:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=I6LJaGoYgSwDpNFpEaaIlABfdlJlPsxUO0evzt3+Dzg=; b=DlLjNPNw1T7pBCVK4mahr/1vb43VNkmV8oZo1uSQB8M0vPehAgjvSqnpJYsUEbKhGx YYZH2lizoFHcysgBrWrESQnJ2E+gsQSuDuTzGqvHqZeWJvnjxlzH5cnx4t6AlXnL9E42 SDQPcsjPMuwvJgiB/Gl5CEFc53QS2xR6hz2zq4pTbw0MrnoXVAzw6LPp6ceqzlWs2d0+ nnvoh0ch4DP+CTTmrMX8loD4Yvq9oNfhuzvUv8OO7e8zAQ9/GYH+HBIRA8Q2MsWrArsG rh/14olrtnd21DsEZq5I7PBLEpIkYBXfJm9LjLADgevCZ2vYF028aXbzooNBw0iD3tcf kMGg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.163.231 with SMTP id yl7mr270488vdb.29.1387052752306; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 12:25:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.58.168.231 with HTTP; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 12:25:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 01:25:52 +0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#16150: Emacs not deleting lock files when system-name is set to nil From: Micky To: Glenn Morris Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c250129613ed04ed846204 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16150 Cc: 16150@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) --001a11c250129613ed04ed846204 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Ehh.. just because one could do that? And setting it to nil shoots no errors during the --init. This gives enough assumptions, I believe ;) On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 1:22 AM, Glenn Morris wrote: > Micky wrote: > > > When setting system-name to nil (should that be allowed?), Emacs forgets > > how to delete the lock files '.#.*' and all subsequent startups complain > > about lockups by old dead PIDs. > > I think this is a "don't do that, then". > If Emacs fails to set system-name, that is a bug. > If you actively set system-name to nil, that's just shooting yourself > in the foot. > Why did you want to do that, and what made you think it would work? > --001a11c250129613ed04ed846204 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Ehh.. just because one could do that? And setting it to ni= l shoots no errors during the --init. This gives enough assumptions, I beli= eve ;)


O= n Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 1:22 AM, Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org> wrote:=
Micky wrote:

> When setting system-name to nil (should that be allowed?), Emacs forge= ts
> how to delete the lock files '.#.*' and all subsequent startup= s complain
> about lockups by old dead PIDs.

I think this is a "don't do that, then".
If Emacs fails to set system-name, that is a bug.
If you actively set system-name to nil, that's just shooting yourself in the foot.
Why did you want to do that, and what made you think it would work?

--001a11c250129613ed04ed846204-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Dec 14 15:32:22 2013 Received: (at 16150) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Dec 2013 20:32:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50378 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vrvsr-00072K-Ou for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 15:32:21 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:35824) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vrvsq-00072A-6p for 16150@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 15:32:20 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vrvsp-000759-QD; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 15:32:19 -0500 From: Glenn Morris To: Micky Subject: Re: bug#16150: Emacs not deleting lock files when system-name is set to nil References: X-Spook: data haven Ruby Ridge Aladdin Area 51 broadside X-Ran: ^iD7&_s,F#w<]fW6[egC?P'iXvP%Z>1ITl,,5\7g3Aqr1_e.8W+l?ZpF"h-Bl],mee*1}~ X-Hue: magenta X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Attribution: GM Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 15:32:19 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Micky's message of "Sun, 15 Dec 2013 01:25:52 +0500") Message-ID: <1uk3f7dvho.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -5.4 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16150 Cc: 16150@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.4 (-----) Micky wrote: > Ehh.. just because one could do that? And setting it to nil shoots no > errors during the --init. This gives enough assumptions, I believe ;) You can do a lot of strange things with Emacs. You could rebind M-x to ignore, have fun if that's what you want to do. :) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Dec 14 15:33:00 2013 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Dec 2013 20:33:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50381 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VrvtT-00073K-5s for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 15:32:59 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:35830) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VrvtR-00073C-JO for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 15:32:57 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VrvtR-0000MG-7E for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 15:32:57 -0500 Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 15:32:57 -0500 Message-Id: Subject: control message for bug 16150 To: X-Mailer: mail (GNU Mailutils 2.1) From: Glenn Morris X-Spam-Score: -5.4 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.4 (-----) tag 16150 wontfix From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Dec 14 15:38:46 2013 Received: (at 16150) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Dec 2013 20:38:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50402 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vrvz3-0007Fo-WB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 15:38:46 -0500 Received: from mail-ve0-f171.google.com ([209.85.128.171]:38895) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vrvz1-0007Fe-Uh for 16150@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 15:38:44 -0500 Received: by mail-ve0-f171.google.com with SMTP id pa12so2313553veb.16 for <16150@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 12:38:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type; bh=phcUkIGgMQNapP9GBJZhkSQWoSxt58ZAV5eUuBwPBHw=; b=zotiMr9r/1pkiyVNgF2jJRM9u4oBiT30bStVj0CDVULqST9UxxSCLq0ymtU1qDXE8h iun62ffR0qOe8trlZIqB7M4+6drEgpt9edPUaxzagJRCMTV2NuAcrLeY1CDx+52la1LP 3Od/FR/di8eTt0VvLt+pA/yxkX+j2FIJFyzUkTNUj1fHHD4Fa38IT/7ROoLDiYg4sn/E cS1YleTRvUi/Dy63rxBpwoRdaOT99LMioni1lZEamUnZrsb3kSma6NvE0np9lj13oKjA 85p1tQXmnN5kJFs36uZrUgWEK0Tjn9SPyiG2NIb/6WTSZbtNd28PoaeMgKGpMYu778VY 96eA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.58.19.195 with SMTP id h3mr230369vee.48.1387053523232; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 12:38:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.58.168.231 with HTTP; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 12:38:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1uk3f7dvho.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <1uk3f7dvho.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 01:38:43 +0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#16150: Emacs not deleting lock files when system-name is set to nil From: Micky Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b86c81e896d5004ed849021 X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16150 Cc: 16150@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) --047d7b86c81e896d5004ed849021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 You can do a lot of strange things with Emacs. You could rebind M-x to ignore, have fun if that's what you want to do. :) On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 1:32 AM, Glenn Morris wrote: > Micky wrote: > > > Ehh.. just because one could do that? And setting it to nil shoots no > > errors during the --init. This gives enough assumptions, I believe ;) > > You can do a lot of strange things with Emacs. > You could rebind M-x to ignore, have fun if that's what you want to do. :) > --047d7b86c81e896d5004ed849021 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
You can do a lot of strange things with Emacs.
You could rebind M-x to ignore, have fun if that's what you want to do. :)


On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 1:32 AM, Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org> wrote:
Micky wrote:

> Ehh.. just because one could do that? And setting it to nil shoots no
> errors during the --init. This gives enough assumptions, I believe ;)

You can do a lot of strange things with Emacs.
You could rebind M-x to ignore, have fun if that's what you want to do. :)

--047d7b86c81e896d5004ed849021-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Dec 14 15:40:07 2013 Received: (at 16150) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Dec 2013 20:40:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50409 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vrw0L-0007JG-J7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 15:40:06 -0500 Received: from mail-ve0-f173.google.com ([209.85.128.173]:53754) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vrw0G-0007Ik-9Q for 16150@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 15:40:01 -0500 Received: by mail-ve0-f173.google.com with SMTP id oz11so2308016veb.4 for <16150@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 12:39:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type; bh=o3pcCVuFKX/mOkz9PSVGTzEI90Yl4uDOBe+ehl2GGzg=; b=Qg025M2OxEhxYj1yiQWFebnWyTNYMbq7+5n0CP5sO28jIMBZebbUVhWEoFNVdazxy+ BtJn64lGbqJQ13RCGe1BqJtf2J2xTsGxIRNddJzExhbZE9iAM/4hYb4r3zgOfC3bROau 5hJOv1vfvkKgDefUBbodvsd/cBr3naWNgE42plHPpxHLZ9QFjxx/X1AoCvJT6o++HJWo F/dIPZvYOC/UbJerraVZcxM8lEwAlipriI4bjgVMFr2A8RjZYXDn7t5785jKFsvAjrbB gMNNrYWTlPbObGT18up69cYhtu83VQ1TuWw6cZ3aufMPzruJiihlONkJgO0X7ZLr2zbi eDzQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.220.174.200 with SMTP id u8mr4801244vcz.6.1387053599814; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 12:39:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.58.168.231 with HTTP; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 12:39:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1uk3f7dvho.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <1uk3f7dvho.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 01:39:59 +0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#16150: Emacs not deleting lock files when system-name is set to nil From: Micky Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0149ca3a19f94604ed8495d5 X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16150 Cc: 16150@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) --089e0149ca3a19f94604ed8495d5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 The importance of 'M-x' is significant. I don't see any rudimentary usage of 'system-name' while one edits file or even plays games. Does it really need to be aware of 'host-name'? Let's be honest, if host-name is that important to Emacs, why did I get everything working except the lock file deletions? On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 1:32 AM, Glenn Morris wrote: > Micky wrote: > > > Ehh.. just because one could do that? And setting it to nil shoots no > > errors during the --init. This gives enough assumptions, I believe ;) > > You can do a lot of strange things with Emacs. > You could rebind M-x to ignore, have fun if that's what you want to do. :) > --089e0149ca3a19f94604ed8495d5 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
The importance of 'M-x' is significant.=A0
I don't see any rudimentary usage of 'system-name' whil= e one edits file or even plays games. Does it really need to be aware of &#= 39;host-name'? Let's be honest, if host-name is that important to E= macs, why did I get everything working except the lock file deletions?=A0


On Sun,= Dec 15, 2013 at 1:32 AM, Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org> wrote:
Micky wrote:

> Ehh.. just because one could do that? And setting it to nil shoots no<= br> > errors during the --init. This gives enough assumptions, I believe ;)<= br>
You can do a lot of strange things with Emacs.
You could rebind M-x to ignore, have fun if that's what you want to do.= :)

--089e0149ca3a19f94604ed8495d5-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Dec 14 20:20:26 2013 Received: (at 16150) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Dec 2013 01:20:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50504 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vs0Ne-0007Vh-7A for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 20:20:26 -0500 Received: from mail-ee0-f50.google.com ([74.125.83.50]:46131) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vs0Nc-0007VX-BA for 16150@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 20:20:24 -0500 Received: by mail-ee0-f50.google.com with SMTP id c41so1511651eek.37 for <16150@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 17:20:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=pZ79Z3djV5Zpsn6vN7xtfTwyGTILSbqtPuf8ONUF8Pg=; b=0a3fkc5s86oRAR4e2T+0YAZrTULAUJN2ZtUUtEQvisoHtvt+cj2UzagtyjI6OiJHYA SDCBWkz/aBLZd2iSSrmc7mnaurhGBCUfzsMcHCJ/wMW0T2waHc4pDpLM7rXKZ+WiE/mK KX0/hk+iZdfiGTDOlETlYp6UZrE4GTKa1WqaOa1krL6Q8r/OwU5Rs93aBC9lq1I5JYjo gmQH3tJXfFNTPwGg67VSO/w++eIzx4f0Cw4mqS9KUM4wFYS/EjadREsRiOdB6L7GIf+P tDrt2qSsfJEwQ82Mu9v8I/8SBwl+DejUiR7/YGj5ZHfbXnxiUCH3Vn8maJBUZBHvKGxc sVMQ== X-Received: by 10.14.211.130 with SMTP id w2mr1446648eeo.111.1387070423401; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 17:20:23 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.209.69 with HTTP; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 17:19:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1uk3f7dvho.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> From: Juanma Barranquero Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 02:19:43 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#16150: Emacs not deleting lock files when system-name is set to nil To: Micky Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16150 Cc: 16150@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Micky wrote: > Let's be > honest, if host-name is that important to Emacs, why did I get everything > working except the lock file deletions? Quite likely because you didn't really test *everything*. So it's a ticking time bomb. J From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Feb 01 02:32:07 2014 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2014 07:32:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43773 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W9V3e-0003dq-NE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 02:32:07 -0500 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:34704) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W9V3b-0003dH-J0 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 02:32:04 -0500 Received: from [204.14.154.233] (helo=building.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1W9V3N-000278-27 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 08:31:49 +0100 Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 23:30:57 -0800 Message-Id: <87a9ebp9vy.fsf@building.gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #16150 X-MailScanner-ID: 1W9V3N-000278-27 X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1391844710.27639@DQ8fbvzNfvr8Cd2UEEv4Bw X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) close 16150 From unknown Mon Jun 23 13:11:28 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2014 12:24:06 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator