From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:00:36 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#16108 <16108@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#16108 <16108@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 24.3; Add optional arg to indent-region Reply-To: bug#16108 <16108@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2025 10:00:36 +0000 retitle 16108 24.3; Add optional arg to indent-region reassign 16108 emacs submitter 16108 Leo Liu severity 16108 wishlist tag 16108 patch thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 10 20:19:14 2013 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Dec 2013 01:19:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42528 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VqYSH-0001q9-Rb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 20:19:14 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49833) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VqYSF-0001pt-AQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 20:19:12 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VqYS6-0004Jg-Hs for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 20:19:10 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:48931) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VqYS6-0004Jc-Ej for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 20:19:02 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51508) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VqYRx-0005Ib-Vx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 20:19:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VqYRk-0004GV-EX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 20:18:53 -0500 Received: from mail-pd0-x22c.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22c]:53117) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VqYRk-0004GJ-5Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 20:18:40 -0500 Received: by mail-pd0-f172.google.com with SMTP id g10so8447235pdj.31 for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 17:18:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=X+I5Iw1okzzVrt3e27Msm2QeWcMm2ELmBaHoQizTY+U=; b=0TfY7jaxhr766pbAHCqP0dJPkZfN8sSMlqK/NWd9QS2EEEaW+XMdwlrqnn/ZxGxUuV EDwtSLgPf+RzvMjf2OkiY8mmaew8iX9/PY9rOnKDDJ7gA1zb3f7KI9GUEZDI6WK/+7w8 z37Eibn5XnepiecH+3zK13U6qGOuxp6GXpiQT7Lw6d2My44JPvbhCb5FvrdvLFE0Sf/D ZoeU85KEr8/7Ey86QbqUPU26gG8sZcb4XpdMC6Jk6LVMT4U4UHTlhOfHefgPzeUmxWpq AaGl8oHkjjQWl+heAFtLwZkP48qOQ5MAmEQFhgm+Viw7gMC9eIhdk2X4p/y5Kz5UMJOQ 4UNw== X-Received: by 10.68.178.197 with SMTP id da5mr31066324pbc.28.1386724719157; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 17:18:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([222.130.178.133]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id gv10sm28599645pbd.0.2013.12.10.17.18.37 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 10 Dec 2013 17:18:38 -0800 (PST) From: Leo Liu To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 24.3; Add optional arg to indent-region X-Debbugs-CC: Stefan Monnier Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 09:18:34 +0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) I use indent-region non-interactively and the progress report gets in the way. So I propose make it possible to suppress it. Objections? === modified file 'lisp/indent.el' --- lisp/indent.el 2013-10-17 19:31:11 +0000 +++ lisp/indent.el 2013-12-11 01:14:31 +0000 @@ -427,7 +427,7 @@ "Short cut function to indent region using `indent-according-to-mode'. A value of nil means really run `indent-according-to-mode' on each line.") -(defun indent-region (start end &optional column) +(defun indent-region (start end &optional column nomsg) "Indent each nonblank line in the region. A numeric prefix argument specifies a column: indent each line to that column. @@ -443,7 +443,8 @@ Called from a program, START and END specify the region to indent. If the third argument COLUMN is an integer, it specifies the -column to indent to; if it is nil, use one of the three methods above." +column to indent to; if it is nil, use one of the three methods above. +If NOMSG is non-nil, do not report progress." (interactive "r\nP") (cond ;; If a numeric prefix is given, indent to that column. @@ -481,13 +482,14 @@ (save-excursion (setq end (copy-marker end)) (goto-char start) - (let ((pr (make-progress-reporter "Indenting region..." (point) end))) - (while (< (point) end) - (or (and (bolp) (eolp)) - (indent-according-to-mode)) + (let ((pr (unless nomsg + (make-progress-reporter "Indenting region..." (point) end)))) + (while (< (point) end) + (or (and (bolp) (eolp)) + (indent-according-to-mode)) (forward-line 1) - (progress-reporter-update pr (point))) - (progress-reporter-done pr) + (and pr (progress-reporter-update pr (point)))) + (and pr (progress-reporter-done pr)) (move-marker end nil))))) ;; In most cases, reindenting modifies the buffer, but it may also ;; leave it unmodified, in which case we have to deactivate the mark From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Dec 11 09:51:35 2013 Received: (at 16108) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Dec 2013 14:51:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43098 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vql8Q-0007Tf-VA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 09:51:35 -0500 Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:45815) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vql8P-0007TX-11 for 16108@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 09:51:33 -0500 Received: from fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id rBBEpU1t010730; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 09:51:31 -0500 Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id BBA2CAE321; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 09:51:31 -0500 (EST) From: Stefan Monnier To: Leo Liu Subject: Re: bug#16108: 24.3; Add optional arg to indent-region Message-ID: References: Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 09:51:31 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Leo Liu's message of "Wed, 11 Dec 2013 09:18:34 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Level: X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.2 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered GEN_SPAM_FEATRE=0.2, RV4788=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9362 : core <4788> : inlines <303> : streams <1089098> : uri <1620898> X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16108 Cc: 16108@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-) > I use indent-region non-interactively and the progress report gets in > the way. So I propose make it possible to suppress it. Objections? I'm not really opposed, but I'd like to understand in which way it "gets in the way". Can you give more details? Stefan From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Dec 11 19:18:45 2013 Received: (at 16108) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Dec 2013 00:18:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44468 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VqtzJ-0006wO-BW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 19:18:45 -0500 Received: from mail-pd0-f179.google.com ([209.85.192.179]:62577) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VqtzH-0006wC-4k for 16108@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 19:18:43 -0500 Received: by mail-pd0-f179.google.com with SMTP id r10so10552912pdi.10 for <16108@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 16:18:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:face:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=sOI0CE74OQfIvWFyBXazEEeJNn5qAH2n7cAb9h5YRw8=; b=o/W+wyhErqouDJJSPtzucSjlcADWWLl6jVhDuwP3cxvmGECwi6wG012M9ZgIEUzNcF F0egVQS2tsEa+M+Sq/cd2e3b3uGokzy9q/BdQupmMwjB98P9b0UpzB+tkK4epxwH1x6d xtkyvD13K2MDu6jH4P4Tu9+K1Yc3dBl+3+SQEpYhbjg8sexZZFml25Il+NF80TnRK6e4 Tc2gPx0QXQCCtGkya5kuwJge8lyC/vHfQUYNPrq9V5oxcpDZCEVLRFXwSS+1Hy2jTQcL KX1rzAEUQlRiaVz+d7LcaWJVYwQsAcYgrw/RC+pazVYvfa7+xsNLN5+3Ld1+kfNJ4ery OoCQ== X-Received: by 10.68.130.130 with SMTP id oe2mr6075109pbb.135.1386807522091; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 16:18:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([123.119.86.232]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id oa3sm35550618pbb.15.2013.12.11.16.18.39 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 11 Dec 2013 16:18:41 -0800 (PST) From: Leo Liu To: Stefan Monnier Subject: Re: bug#16108: 24.3; Add optional arg to indent-region References: Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACgAAAAoBAMAAAB+0KVeAAAAElBMVEUAAAAAAP+LRRP0pGC+ vr7///+7mT1iAAAAAWJLR0QAiAUdSAAAAAlwSFlzAAALEwAACxMBAJqcGAAAAAd0SU1FB9cBBwMO DhglKe4AAAEsSURBVCjPbZNBboQwDEV/Cd4X9QJRThApmn0XYW+Jyf2v0m+HhqDBgiAe9rcTG7QH w/1Vn2Ar8gBb/ocywSN3qK9T3z4eFDB4eApocBpeBs1RSykoJd8gQcm8pGmHXFso3ajnmsqV0TnY DQkOfXUfN5NwaI7AWTVOyEhcu1aHmdWItHddUVUcUgUBCkitu8V6ditHVOVdqzl2EQ1ZVGTbdK0V 7cqn8vWzoU5Q/bF9Y/Y0cRU1xwkys5dJ+Dt6pBDWifcNQml8Gh2JVmPSoQzo7en0grswkxrUGYJ7 0hSxxAGr7ZMwYcHIzprpi7TENEE1xtiYxixRlCfPBsUUrwHD7uGIwATrbnODJcVrPpVn3hxiGloe m/S+z3CtuzUSMo83N4DPH+F0evwR3P4A2k+75838OKQAAAAASUVORK5CYII= Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 08:18:33 +0800 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Wed, 11 Dec 2013 09:51:31 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (OS X 10.9) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16108 Cc: 16108@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) On 2013-12-11 22:51 +0800, Stefan Monnier wrote: > I'm not really opposed, but I'd like to understand in which way it "gets > in the way". Can you give more details? I advise yank to indent the pasted text. so when yank into minibuffer instead of seeing the yanked text I am seeing the progress messages. I just realised another solution is to opt out indentation in minibuffer in my case. However it seems this NOMSG arg is still useful. Programmaticly one can disable progress reporter for small regions. So should I go ahead and install it? Leo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Dec 12 13:34:40 2013 Received: (at 16108) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Dec 2013 18:34:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46072 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VrB5r-0003R4-7C for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 13:34:39 -0500 Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:59216) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VrB5o-0003Qv-Sr for 16108@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 13:34:37 -0500 Received: from fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id rBCIYYHC001409; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 13:34:35 -0500 Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 87D3BAE350; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 13:34:34 -0500 (EST) From: Stefan Monnier To: Leo Liu Subject: Re: bug#16108: 24.3; Add optional arg to indent-region Message-ID: References: Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 13:34:34 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Leo Liu's message of "Thu, 12 Dec 2013 08:18:33 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV4790=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9362 : core <4790> : inlines <316> : streams <1089726> : uri <1622045> X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16108 Cc: 16108@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) >> I'm not really opposed, but I'd like to understand in which way it "gets >> in the way". Can you give more details? > I advise yank to indent the pasted text. so when yank into minibuffer > instead of seeing the yanked text I am seeing the progress messages. Good point. We shouldn't emit such messages when we're in the minibuffer (or we should emit them differently, so as not to hide the minibuffer text, e.g. like minibuffer-message does). > So should I go ahead and install it? Let's first silence (unconditionally) the messages when in the minibuffer. We'll see later if messages still need to be silenced, and in which cases. Stefan From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Dec 12 20:57:52 2013 Received: (at 16108-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Dec 2013 01:57:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46329 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VrI0l-00060t-Sz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 20:57:52 -0500 Received: from mail-pb0-f43.google.com ([209.85.160.43]:50417) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VrI0k-00060l-2V for 16108-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 20:57:50 -0500 Received: by mail-pb0-f43.google.com with SMTP id rq2so1600067pbb.2 for <16108-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 17:57:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:face:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=2eDFoUEuGYLH5rE7pJrRV35dU//YCxD3yJauucI76HU=; b=J/QR5OTv4Jx7XNR9BOMMXj/IOyl5MbEsm+hmBn82imuXryJXZg3x7fDLR3OS4Ny/ZD WZDdMmCrkEeYFucvT7HPcpv4X3JYOZuQEI0mS5yODBW+3XobF2aLZ+eHI+7chhOTpfh0 SZuPbZFSfQZSH/0uizeaqLy5EPh26Q0DvCiGlrz98SHbzMeU4YE+IMrYURGj5nTzsEYW gueRGsO0URXGQSud6bMNzM32JMZnbiFhKnHcedLrD3aNvGTqnX6nRP/GWEY7l5rNT8zX Lj8dRY/VVfYMPpZFJ78idunog0hBeAMUflqbV3dJn0OI+beWIZoF0wxfdgstAgKLZemi lrrg== X-Received: by 10.68.197.165 with SMTP id iv5mr17022202pbc.150.1386899869039; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 17:57:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([222.130.183.245]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id hz10sm557246pbc.36.2013.12.12.17.57.46 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 12 Dec 2013 17:57:48 -0800 (PST) From: Leo Liu To: Stefan Monnier Subject: Re: bug#16108: 24.3; Add optional arg to indent-region References: Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACgAAAAoBAMAAAB+0KVeAAAAGFBMVEUKDAg1NjRWV1V9fnyg op/DxcLk5uP8/voi63ReAAAACXBIWXMAAAWJAAAFiQFtaJ36AAAAB3RJTUUH1goZAgAz00bgXgAA AeVJREFUKM9lk0Fz2jAQhQXJD3CCO70CmcC1YMtcWyTZ14Bl69xats4N9r6/3zWQBlodNKNPu/s0 b1cCQFuZGpfVVh3vAvBJolIXRkapSuoRUtIdFyo1Y5xSdlAj7OtvD1XnXxmWRi+eWgcxyCed1lVV B1CrKyujMoi+eLA5kU1SsjoHlW+nQjTtFxk4MXgrOxvIqzoTZR8XgPaLl419zgsMaSGFPiUOZCIh thsx5Xy9NsK8Kwf/JoQgMxcVJ301HKkcSWaT0O7FY056J4U9xcYfnmVXG4801lW6lqwu2nKFZoHC HuzvaTVndZ+LaRQgZdthXw1cpynEkLEwyFHXk/aIxNQ6QeooJuzPMB+wn+D7JJNsiCcVA13/A3h/ xE9J+WidpAwoYNmRFwyvSRhNVtsdaAewzZZP5uw82QL9+tyNfocyP0McAzICUr5Mk9RdIjWasUNx aIIt6NK4ZtXIMdfMQt3nuMAyWbLI4DqZ4xPq/ag8jPond4XU/cLuOgw6XCFX/YCUfcDAMMH58fD4 G9kDchwfqVefkBwup2uZM+Q4WhJt5jN3AxXCsaS2yXEDuWgS8VOzW0gFjhEPmLyFMKBFaLb1HRwc DiaKwx0EeTMRYnYPQRW3PP4HApvlMv0PttX5v/D6Aws3IOSEwzmLAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 09:57:41 +0800 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Thu, 12 Dec 2013 13:34:34 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (OS X 10.9) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16108-done Cc: 16108-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) Fixed in 24.4 On 2013-12-13 02:34 +0800, Stefan Monnier wrote: > Let's first silence (unconditionally) the messages when in > the minibuffer. We'll see later if messages still need to be silenced, > and in which cases. Sounds good. Leo From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:00:36 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 12:24:03 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator