From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 10 11:51:25 2013 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Dec 2013 16:51:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41934 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VqQWq-0004gx-UI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 11:51:25 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42023) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <92vishwas@gmail.com>) id 1VqK1c-0001Dj-Ur for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 04:54:45 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <92vishwas@gmail.com>) id 1VqK1c-0000Y0-05 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 04:54:44 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:46791) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <92vishwas@gmail.com>) id 1VqK1b-0000Xw-Se for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 04:54:43 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43732) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <92vishwas@gmail.com>) id 1VqK1a-0000PO-Jm for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 04:54:43 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <92vishwas@gmail.com>) id 1VqK1Y-0000XK-SF for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 04:54:42 -0500 Received: from mail-ie0-x22f.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22f]:51223) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <92vishwas@gmail.com>) id 1VqK1Y-0000WD-NR for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 04:54:40 -0500 Received: by mail-ie0-f175.google.com with SMTP id x13so7917683ief.6 for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 01:54:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=iOR4hN9VPjD9uxpr3JY+6amXxszqzg96RGMBKN2F8l8=; b=ebn6nLAVxp8RdpWPyYObkeBWvQ07EbtXtan8AmAlrdnDWS4GAneNauwGU7ATJAXVOF TqgL/4X5RtF7CKIaWk7sXBAlXARzvuBQukjPNr5Mj+C2p3a8O98sO7Qad5N0QMqEvkeP awzaaNNlQUMjMf/btvYc0ELyNuIGH9qNvywrQEDawliy1TQnxgDYR42+CIe6OLyRMi/T 8JvzwJw/Un2BozlCZdJzwOF3X9524nowlFJSklc2YbuDyRvQMbvA8es1NyF0GxvWyrQu IyKjMGfkTqeqcTBqH0sNBkW5ZMEZyHl+hOmDgF37urRwBl4g1a1ntllgwV96IdL1mBiN InDA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.43.49.1 with SMTP id uy1mr594564icb.48.1386669272682; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 01:54:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.50.50.210 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 01:54:32 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 15:24:32 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Bug in uname command From: Vishwas Dhankhar <92vishwas@gmail.com> To: bug-coreutils@gnu.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec529a0236b569b04ed2b192f X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 11:51:22 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) --bcaec529a0236b569b04ed2b192f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, Man page of uname command states that uname options: -r, --kernel-release print the kernel release -v, --kernel-version print the kernel version But I got the following result while using these options: inlc7921> uname -r 2.6.16.60-0.58.1.3835.0.PTF.638363-smp inlc7921> uname -v #1 SMP Wed Dec 2 12:27:56 UTC 2009 This seems a little opposite to what man page suggests. Please do take a look. --bcaec529a0236b569b04ed2b192f Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,

Man page of uname command states th= at uname options:

-r, --kernel-release =A0 = =A0 print the kernel release
-v, --kernel-version =A0 =A0 print t= he kernel version

But I got the following result while using these = options:

inlc7921> uname -r
2.6.= 16.60-0.58.1.3835.0.PTF.638363-smp

inlc7921> un= ame -v
#1 SMP Wed Dec 2 12:27:56 UTC 2009

This= seems a little opposite to what man page suggests. Please do take a look.<= /div>

--bcaec529a0236b569b04ed2b192f-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 10 12:18:40 2013 Received: (at 16100) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Dec 2013 17:18:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42000 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VqQxD-0007hA-Ea for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 12:18:40 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:53708) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VqQx9-0007gx-SS; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 12:18:37 -0500 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rBAHIY1t007474 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 10 Dec 2013 12:18:35 -0500 Received: from [10.3.113.140] (ovpn-113-140.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.140]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rBAHIYFx017038; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 12:18:34 -0500 Message-ID: <52A74CE9.1040405@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 10:18:33 -0700 From: Eric Blake Organization: Red Hat, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vishwas Dhankhar <92vishwas@gmail.com>, 16100@debbugs.gnu.org, GNU bug tracker automated control server Subject: Re: bug#16100: Bug in uname command References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 OpenPGP: url=http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="erMO97UCohSnP96G5RpbKWa8IS6KcnVih" X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.24 X-Spam-Score: -5.2 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 16100 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.2 (-----) This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --erMO97UCohSnP96G5RpbKWa8IS6KcnVih Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable forcemerge 14388 16100 thanks On 12/10/2013 02:54 AM, Vishwas Dhankhar wrote: > Hi, >=20 > Man page of uname command states that uname options: >=20 > -r, --kernel-release print the kernel release > -v, --kernel-version print the kernel version >=20 > But I got the following result while using these options: >=20 > inlc7921> uname -r > 2.6.16.60-0.58.1.3835.0.PTF.638363-smp >=20 > inlc7921> uname -v > #1 SMP Wed Dec 2 12:27:56 UTC 2009 >=20 > This seems a little opposite to what man page suggests. Please do take = a > look. Thanks for the report. However, this is turning into a FAQ; see debbugs.gnu.org/14388 for the last discussion on the issue (we are accurately returning what the kernel sticks in the struct used by the uname(2) syscall; changing things would require a kernel change and not something we can effect here; about the best we could do is a doc update to make it clear that we really return whatever random strings the kernel tells us even if those strings aren't "release" and "version" in the sense you are expecting). --=20 Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org --erMO97UCohSnP96G5RpbKWa8IS6KcnVih Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Public key at http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJSp0zqAAoJEKeha0olJ0Nq/HYIAJ2T/Y/W1ZgQwvvlccNIYzNc 3MVjbpse0ay0aCv8tCDjOsOBEdPFill73w2UyejbinqBxHm1Y7ARgkjctxuOd+Xg 8APOApu6/axWCfSUthniGPz6ZL66zUt4X83IxRo+ybrwGGayUt/T8PvdemrWVG2Z ftuYrI0NnQuKo6t2qTlYLb3jjTqYEJ4q+ffkYavxgEbgkXM4bDRrhpV6i610xAEA gwQEVbKZyPSQuypdm1vM08U0hm7kRY2I5Nxkcx3iIxDiHkCM3w5lf6K1yVBzKIlq mlxG8pur7Z7ENUMU+mYqNeJ4qpngw7U2FVRKpn12F+MY26aKAzqIksEcpdqtO8Q= =mUhY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --erMO97UCohSnP96G5RpbKWa8IS6KcnVih-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 10 12:20:04 2013 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Dec 2013 17:20:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42010 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VqQyZ-0007kV-Jk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 12:20:04 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:46780) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VqQyV-0007jt-Hy; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 12:20:00 -0500 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rBAHJwVw007991 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 10 Dec 2013 12:19:58 -0500 Received: from [10.3.113.140] (ovpn-113-140.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.140]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rBAHJw64017611; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 12:19:58 -0500 Message-ID: <52A74D3E.3020200@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 10:19:58 -0700 From: Eric Blake Organization: Red Hat, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: NARHAR DEV SHARMA , 16101@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#16101: Doubt regarding uname command References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 OpenPGP: url=http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ggmIxljQaTn23uTbP1KdqoVi3NXd6kjMp" X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.24 X-Spam-Score: -5.2 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.2 (-----) This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --ggmIxljQaTn23uTbP1KdqoVi3NXd6kjMp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable forcemerge 14388 16101 thanks On 12/10/2013 03:10 AM, NARHAR DEV SHARMA wrote: > uname command manual page show about these options as follow: > -r, --kernel-release > print the kernel release >=20 > -v, --kernel-version > print the kernel version >=20 > but i found that these options are conflicting as given in manual page >=20 > eg >=20 > inlc7940> uname -v > #1 SMP Wed Dec 2 12:27:56 UTC 2009 > inlc7940> uname -r > 2.6.16.60-0.58.1.3835.0.PTF.638363-smp >=20 > Help me to solve this problem.... Thanks for the report. However, this is turning into a FAQ; see debbugs.gnu.org/14388 for the last discussion on the issue (we are accurately returning what the kernel sticks in the struct used by the uname(2) syscall; changing things would require a kernel change and not something we can effect here; about the best we could do is a doc update to make it clear that we really return whatever random strings the kernel tells us even if those strings aren't "release" and "version" in the sense you are expecting). --=20 Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org --ggmIxljQaTn23uTbP1KdqoVi3NXd6kjMp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Public key at http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJSp00+AAoJEKeha0olJ0NqcFgIAJFg1KcWYL9PsEv+coEXJzfS C1nXppRVAl/Ord9L26yi5IVlwWh//jEQ5bk5QrmayuuXwAjFI4ZBkIW6bjNzTMn0 fPIObgPsF1EClhTpbsU9Vt/jsHQWoYi9yfqDIsL0oIDD5WVkxhAAlNvzDorGxTJL PZhubm4tTyvrz0FBRF1XGlEMu3jbyPtPQyX02EcmVrYHoeZJ1avcli1yrPPpOLwH yJzs0wpJ9M1S6NO5Hp9I1Rq8awCfztv9sChxqVkm/+OoEJjak0SLprqygW0d3QgW yQxjLGCBhfxeQxJ/nUPzw7MwaSCCpuny24y5JREVhkazhlUVrtsq2vldc3RBeS8= =UCzl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ggmIxljQaTn23uTbP1KdqoVi3NXd6kjMp-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Oct 18 20:31:51 2018 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Oct 2018 00:31:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57743 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gDIhj-0000rL-Dv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2018 20:31:51 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-f182.google.com ([209.85.214.182]:38262) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gDIhi-0000mi-8i for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2018 20:31:50 -0400 Received: by mail-pl1-f182.google.com with SMTP id q19-v6so11989031pll.5 for ; Thu, 18 Oct 2018 17:31:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=to:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=W5yCeZRlXHDAEQhM/s7EqoAjx/Ygz3Uup2/qsMcs4q0=; b=V90SzfjJrVgjiUeiHv7WMNFqbfsOtfJK3GKMijCXIkiXEUTRdhjI9zJTeAX7nnuBb4 jD/wAUDcu6+XxR7AGVU5ucaYnlZVhOdWumq6YrfHIKzVLX5/UCpMoSA4Zs1VneiwsfkX exiRNn1cspkqBhvll3ohebr5i7G3g0P9/X39X9tJ4LGL4O64nmA0i+ketXI+Sva2wETC tehdJ6OWBRezyHKjQlQhqfV2b4uwcO1gazZgwDaB1XCu9VpBSq2+/d5udY2JtlCPueKB Q2jJa9Sau1RUdJaGyoUZbnm3OoMQ/7MDX2BTOsMmiWzepE9HwvyOzjnIUj9hE/IaPG8o sEHA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=W5yCeZRlXHDAEQhM/s7EqoAjx/Ygz3Uup2/qsMcs4q0=; b=VQPNLjKfpXmdt4xsNfP1txC5K6udDFp7gf2RInTLu2k1S3xh/4+eKzOI024twi+5ny BgNpz5CwxrGaH9fJL33k4ojasVv7F0HXIsmTFU1d/skQiJL3miZ8MCtxdmPfZj6p5oHq stLcXzrtb0EVUKb6q9bh5XbKFJCh2QXscJLEfdXqT9HYJFWvyGsHi4+8Nmb3cYktxaHF 4oGJrbhw2XkZKYXzbKHqn5Q3gIW7i/TmQYbCaCu6g5HGkQCLz+srHvicz7/kL4yYR7qG d2u9LOgP4jFeTyCcrr1/i/+q7JbheLz5qOx3kBN4lMB6PRgkhLo05bC7HrRnFMsAkex1 WdpQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfoiogIJTt6DhOQIgYk7uEu86P4I9kiI93jhwGtzuSmoKPxiq7WnH RQFN4nDfoO+t53uwhrOppNUHd8dB9I8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV61wTF36Jf+oqpC0Bd5lqb5WUVhL52fRuTq7WW7zn6VJ9yHatSolD71YLCy+Smu0xdJ9yuQ7Ew== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:32a4:: with SMTP id z33-v6mr21295378plb.85.1539909104146; Thu, 18 Oct 2018 17:31:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tomato.housegordon.com (moose.housegordon.com. [184.68.105.38]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id h5-v6sm15682664pgh.42.2018.10.18.17.31.42 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 18 Oct 2018 17:31:43 -0700 (PDT) To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Assaf Gordon Message-ID: Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 18:31:42 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: tags 14388 notabug close 14388 [...] Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.214.182 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (assafgordon[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header 0.2 NO_SUBJECT Extra score for no subject X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) tags 14388 notabug close 14388 From unknown Wed Jun 25 00:21:48 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 12:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator