GNU bug report logs - #16086
24.3.50; [PATCH] eww: New command and functions to list the browser histories.

Previous Next

Full log

Message #29 received at 16086 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Kenjiro NAKAYAMA <nakayamakenjiro <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Cc: 16086 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#16086: 24.3.50;
 [PATCH] eww: New command and functions to list the browser
 histories...
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 10:48:28 +0900

> Recently?  It needs to be on file.  Usually you'll get an acknowledgment
> from the FSF clerk.  We can contact them if you haven't heard back yet
> and it's been a long time.

I sent the paper twelve days ago. But it may take a little while, since I
sent it from Japan.
Yesterday, I e-mailed the FSF clerk about this. Altough I have heard
nothing from them yet, I will tell you soon if I get the
acknowledgement.

Kenjiro


tzz <at> lifelogs.com writes:

> On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 08:54:16 +0900 Kenjiro NAKAYAMA <nakayamakenjiro <at> gmail.com> wrote: 
>
>>> It's very easy, in your case it's just moving up and down 1 line IIUC.
>>> But it's not critical and you can even choose to leave it to me :)
>
> KN> I misunderstood. I thought binding `next-error' and `previous-error'
> KN> means it shows the page view with command "n" and "p". (Like the
> KN> result of emacs grep-mode or compilation-mode.)
>
> Right, yes.  The chief advantage is that I don't have to remember the
> "next" and "previous" keys for every mode that supports this :)
>
>>> The patch looks OK, but please remind me, do we have contributor papers
>>> from you?  It's a large patch.
>
> KN> Yes, I have already signed and sent the paper.
>
> Recently?  It needs to be on file.  Usually you'll get an acknowledgment
> from the FSF clerk.  We can contact them if you haven't heard back yet
> and it's been a long time.
>
> Ted

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.