GNU bug report logs - #16061
Error in the message for src/shuf.c:73 in 8.22-pre3

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Pádraig Brady <P <at> draigBrady.com>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#16061: closed (Error in the message for src/shuf.c:73 in
 8.22-pre3)
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 20:11:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Fri, 06 Dec 2013 20:09:51 +0000
with message-id <52A22F0F.8010209 <at> draigBrady.com>
and subject line Re: bug#16061: Error in the message for src/shuf.c:73 in 8.22-pre3
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #16061,
regarding Error in the message for src/shuf.c:73 in 8.22-pre3
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
16061: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=16061
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Philipp Thomas <pth <at> suse.de>
To: bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org
Subject: Error in the message for src/shuf.c:73 in 8.22-pre3
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 21:54:04 +0100

The description for the -r option for shuf in 8.22-pre3 reads:

"  -r, --repetitions         output COUNT items, allowing repetition.\n"
"                              -n 1 is implied if not specified.\n"

Which is confusing as to what COUNT relates to.

Philipp

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Pádraig Brady <P <at> draigBrady.com>
To: Bernhard Voelker <mail <at> bernhard-voelker.de>
Cc: Philipp Thomas <pth <at> suse.de>, 16061-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>
Subject: Re: bug#16061: Error in the message for src/shuf.c:73 in 8.22-pre3
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 20:09:51 +0000

On 12/06/2013 07:26 PM, Bernhard Voelker wrote:
> On 12/06/2013 06:57 PM, Paul Eggert wrote:
>> Here's a patch, which I've taken the liberty of pushing.
> 
> Thanks, I'm fine with this behavior.
> Minor nit: sc_long_lines is triggered.
> 
> BTW: I noticed another tiny flaw in the test (not related to
> your patch). The following fixes both.

good spot!

Please push.

Marking this bug as done.

thanks everyone,
Pádraig.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.