GNU bug report logs - #16051
24.3.50; Emacs hang - resize frame manually

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>

Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 14:41:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 24.3.50

Done: martin rudalics <rudalics <at> gmx.at>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: martin rudalics <rudalics <at> gmx.at>
Cc: 16051 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#16051: 24.3.50; Emacs hang - resize frame manually
Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2013 17:18:37 +0200
> Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2013 15:23:53 +0100
> From: martin rudalics <rudalics <at> gmx.at>
> CC: 16051 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> 
>  > Now I understand why your build doesn't crash: you didn't specify
>  > GLYPH_DEBUG.  I build with --enable-checking='yes,glyphs'.  The
>  > function where Emacs hits the assertion is not compiled in without
>  > GLYPH_DEBUG being defined.
> 
> OK.  But Drew's didn't crash either and he talked about a hang IIRC.

His build is with GLYPH_DEBUG:

  In GNU Emacs 24.3.50.2 (i686-pc-mingw32)
   of 2013-11-28 on LEG570
  Bzr revision: 115271 rgm <at> gnu.org-20131128203155-qjc1xsp19z2k64b2
  Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 6.1.7601
  Configured using:
   `configure --enable-checking 'CFLAGS=-O0 -g3' CPPFLAGS=-DGLYPH_DEBUG=1'

I don't know why it didn't crash.

>  > Not sure what are you asking.  The Windows build seems indeed to be
>  > devoid of XPM,
> 
> Yes.  Currently building as
> 
>    Does Emacs use -lXaw3d?                                 no
>    Does Emacs use -lXpm?                                   no
>    Does Emacs use -ljpeg?                                  no
>    Does Emacs use -ltiff?                                  no
>    Does Emacs use a gif library?                           no
>    Does Emacs use -lpng?                                   no
>    Does Emacs use -lrsvg-2?                                no
>    Does Emacs use imagemagick?                             no
> 
> Why did the build script not complain (not that I mind - I rather prefer
> it this way)?

Complain about what?  It is perfectly OK to build without XPM, it's
just not common.

> Earlier I had to explicitly specify
> 
>   --without-xpm --without-png --without-jpeg --without-tiff --without-gif

Maybe on Unix.

> And BTW what happend to ./nt/msysconfig.sh?

Its functionality was incorporated into configure.




This bug report was last modified 10 years and 151 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.