GNU bug report logs - #16039
repeated emacs crashes (in GC?)

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: emacs user <user.emacs <at> gmail.com>

Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 14:57:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: fixed

Fixed in version 25.2

Done: Alan Third <alan <at> idiocy.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #32 received at 16039 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: emacs user <user.emacs <at> gmail.com>
To: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu <mituharu <at> math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, 16039 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#16039: repeated emacs crashes (in GC?)
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 19:17:20 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Dear Eli and Mitsuharu, Please let me know if there is anything else I can
do, test patches or such.  again, Emacs just does not ever crash for me
after the change mentioned below, a great relief.  E


On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 10:29 PM, emacs user <user.emacs <at> gmail.com> wrote:

> so after running the same emacs session for 72 hours, during which I used
> vm many times and emacs used a total of 1.5 CPU hours, I think it is safe
> to say that this problem that caused frequent crashes is fixed by the
> increase in newlim as specified below. I hope something like this can be
> implemented in the emacs development version.   Thanks for your help, best,
> E
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 8:54 AM, emacs user <user.emacs <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I managed to compile your mac port and inserted:
>>
>>       newlim = (re_max_failures * ratio + 200000)*2;
>>
>> will let you know in a few days if I still see crashes.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 2:35 AM, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu <
>> mituharu <at> math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp> wrote:
>>
>>> >>>>> On Wed, 04 Dec 2013 10:48:11 +0900, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu <
>>> mituharu <at> math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp> said:
>>>
>>> >>> Having 136 thousand frames during GC is not unheard of.
>>>
>>> >> (/ 8720000.0 (* 136 1000))
>>> >> 64.11764705882354
>>>
>>> >> If each frame consumes more than 64 bytes, then it will use up
>>> >> 8720000B stack space.
>>>
>>> > FWIW, the default compiler for Xcode 4.0.2 on Mac OS X 10.6 with the
>>> > -O2 option seems to consume 64 bytes for each mark_object frame:
>>>
>>> >   i686-apple-darwin10-gcc-4.2.1 (GCC) 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5666)
>>> (dot 3)
>>>
>>> >   _mark_object:
>>> >   00000000000008a0    pushq   %rbp
>>> >   00000000000008a1    movq    %rsp, %rbp
>>> >   00000000000008a4    movq    %rbx, 0xffffffffffffffd8(%rbp)
>>> >   00000000000008a8    movq    %r12, 0xffffffffffffffe0(%rbp)
>>> >   00000000000008ac    movq    %r13, 0xffffffffffffffe8(%rbp)
>>> >   00000000000008b0    movq    %r14, 0xfffffffffffffff0(%rbp)
>>> >   00000000000008b4    movq    %r15, 0xfffffffffffffff8(%rbp)
>>> >   00000000000008b8    subq    $0x40, %rsp
>>>
>>> > And the one for Xcode 5.0.2 on OS X 10.9 with -O4 does 24 bytes:
>>>
>>> >   Apple LLVM version 5.0 (clang-500.2.79) (based on LLVM 3.3svn)
>>>
>>> >   _mark_object:
>>> >   0000000000005c70    pushq   %rbp
>>> >   0000000000005c71    movq    %rsp, %rbp
>>> >   0000000000005c74    pushq   %r15
>>> >   0000000000005c76    pushq   %r14
>>> >   0000000000005c78    pushq   %r13
>>> >   0000000000005c7a    pushq   %r12
>>> >   0000000000005c7c    pushq   %rbx
>>> >   0000000000005c7d    subq    $0x18, %rsp
>>>
>>> I forgot to count the pushq instructions.  The correct value would be
>>> 72 bytes for each mark_object frame in both cases.
>>>
>>>                                      YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
>>>                                 mituharu <at> math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp
>>>
>>
>>
>
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 8 years and 190 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.