GNU bug report logs - #16028
24.3.50; Latest build completely breaks my thumnail frames code

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>

Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 15:53:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 24.3.50

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: martin rudalics <rudalics <at> gmx.at>
Cc: 16028 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, drew.adams <at> oracle.com
Subject: bug#16028: 24.3.50; Latest build completely breaks my thumnail frames code
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 10:45:01 +0200

> Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 09:20:40 +0100
> From: martin rudalics <rudalics <at> gmx.at>
> Cc: 16028 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> ;; (enlarge-font-by 4)
> ;; (enlarge-font-by -4)
> ;; (enlarge-font-by -4)
> ;; (enlarge-font-by 0)
> ;; (enlarge-font-by 4)
> 
> 
> With emacs -Q evaluating the commented out rows in sequence gets me in *temp*:
> 
> -outline-Courier New-normal-normal-normal-mono-13-*-*-*-c-*-iso8859-1 (80 . 38) (672 . 608) ->
> -outline-Courier New-normal-normal-normal-mono-17-*-*-*-c-*-iso8859-1 (80 . 38) (836 . 760)
> 
> -outline-Courier New-normal-normal-normal-mono-17-*-*-*-c-*-iso8859-1 (80 . 38) (836 . 760) ->
> -outline-Courier New-normal-normal-normal-mono-13-*-*-*-c-*-iso8859-1 (80 . 38) (672 . 608)
> 
> -outline-Courier New-normal-normal-normal-mono-13-*-*-*-c-*-iso8859-1 (80 . 38) (672 . 608) ->
> -outline-Courier New-normal-normal-normal-mono-9-*-*-*-c-*-iso8859-1 (80 . 38) (436 . 456)
> 
> -outline-Courier New-normal-normal-normal-mono-9-*-*-*-c-*-iso8859-1 (80 . 38) (436 . 456) ->
> -outline-Courier New-normal-normal-normal-mono-9-*-*-*-c-*-iso8859-1 (80 . 38) (436 . 456)
> 
> -outline-Courier New-normal-normal-normal-mono-9-*-*-*-c-*-iso8859-1 (80 . 38) (436 . 456) ->
> -outline-Courier New-normal-normal-normal-mono-13-*-*-*-c-*-iso8859-1 (80 . 38) (672 . 608)
> 
> 
> The sit-for is needed for getting the right new pixel values, the
> resizing effect is the same when I comment it out.  What do you get
> here?

Perhaps the real-life thumbnail-mode does something to restore the
frame dimensions, thus countermanding the effect of making the font
smaller?
This bug report was last modified 11 years and 100 days ago.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.