GNU bug report logs - #15998
24.3; forward-sexp (scan-sexps) doesn't do well with some SEXPs

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Shigeru Fukaya <shigeru.fukaya <at> gmail.com>

Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 14:46:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: moreinfo

Merged with 30132

Found in versions 24.3, 27.0.50

Fixed in version 29.1

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Cc: Shigeru Fukaya <shigeru.fukaya <at> gmail.com>, 15998 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#15998: 24.3; forward-sexp (scan-sexps) doesn't do well with some SEXPs
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 13:06:22 -0400
> But do we want to implement a brand new forward-sexp just for Emacs Lisp?

No, but I think syntax-propertize can take care of those things.

> I'm assuming that a Lisp-based implementation would be
> uncomfortably slow...
>
> To recap, the following doesn't forward-sexp correctly:
>
> 1. #s(...)          hash table
> 2. ^[...] ^^[...]   char table
> 5. ##               empty symbol
> 9. #&N"XXX"         bool vector

[ I believe for (2) there's a missing # in there somewhere, right?  ]

> And especially 1) is rather annoying...

I do wonder when/where these things show up, tho.
I'd expect those to appear in .elc files and in the output of M-: and
IELM buffers, but not in emacs-lisp-mode buffers.


        Stefan





This bug report was last modified 3 years and 15 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.