GNU bug report logs - #15991
24.3.50; Wishlist: Make test suite user-friendlier

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>

Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 20:06:02 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Found in version 24.3.50

Fixed in version 25.1

Done: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Andreas Röhler <andreas.roehler <at> easy-emacs.de>
Cc: 15991 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#15991: 24.3.50; Wishlist: Make test suite user-friendlier
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 13:33:27 +0300
> Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 12:00:19 +0200
> From: Andreas Röhler <andreas.roehler <at> easy-emacs.de>
> CC: 15991 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> > I'm not sure I understand what you are saying.  When a test fails,
> > don't you want to debug Emacs to understand why and find a solution?
> >
> > So yes, testing and debugging are different things, but when a test
> > fails, one frequently needs to debug Emacs.
> >
> >
> 
> That depends. IIUC it's about making it more user friendly.
> Perspective of users is different from core developers.
> 
> So if, say 10 from 100 tests fail, it doesn't mean to start a debug.
> Maybe just taking notice and look, if it matters for current task.

If someone just wants to take a look, they can do just that.  No one
is forcing them to say "make foo.log DEBUG=1" and run the foo test
under a debugger.  This is an optional feature, as should be clear
from reading the original bug report and this discussion.

> We had that matter already WRT steep learning curve.
> Keeping things apart if possible is important.

Not sure how is this related to the issue at hand.  Maybe you should
read the whole discussion.




This bug report was last modified 10 years and 289 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.