Subject: Re: bug#15962: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt

From: Eli Zaretskii <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 19:27:39 +0200

> Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 07:53:43 -0800 (PST)
> From: Drew Adams <[email-masked]>
> Cc: [email-masked]
> 
> But the backtrace, however inaccurate, is genuine - not at all bogus;
> I can assure you of that.

I didn't think otherwise.  By "bogus" I meant that the data was
garbled, not that it was sabotaged.