From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Nov 23 18:44:02 2013 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Nov 2013 23:44:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40765 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VkMrq-0002mp-Kx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Nov 2013 18:44:02 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39024) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VkMrp-0002mI-Fv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Nov 2013 18:44:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VkMre-0000Ut-Mi for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Nov 2013 18:43:56 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:58315) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VkMre-0000Ug-KD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Nov 2013 18:43:50 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40720) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VkMrZ-000587-E5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Nov 2013 18:43:50 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VkMrS-0000CQ-PC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Nov 2013 18:43:45 -0500 Received: from ps18281.dreamhost.com ([69.163.218.105]:42024 helo=ps18281.dreamhostps.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VkMrS-0000Br-JN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Nov 2013 18:43:38 -0500 Received: from localhost.jurta.org (ps18281.dreamhostps.com [69.163.218.105]) by ps18281.dreamhostps.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 770F4258B9E937 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2013 15:43:36 -0800 (PST) From: Juri Linkov To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 24.3.50; display-buffer-at-bottom not at bottom Organization: JURTA Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 01:39:47 +0200 Message-ID: <87bo1a3cxo.fsf@mail.jurta.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x (no timestamps) [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) This bug report is followup from http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2013-11/msg00773.html In emacs -Q that is wide enough to contain two side-by-side windows in the *scratch* buffer evaluate: (add-to-list 'display-buffer-alist '("\\*Completions\\*" display-buffer-at-bottom (nil))) (display-buffer (get-buffer-create "*Completions*")) The *Completions* window is displayed to the right from the *scratch* window, not below. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Nov 24 05:11:11 2013 Received: (at 15961) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Nov 2013 10:11:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41595 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VkWek-0002eU-NL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Nov 2013 05:11:10 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:65521) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VkWej-0002eH-6c for 15961@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Nov 2013 05:11:09 -0500 Received: from [62.47.38.99] ([62.47.38.99]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MDn8s-1Vso6j1Gne-00H9Bi for <15961@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 24 Nov 2013 11:11:03 +0100 Message-ID: <5291D0B0.6020109@gmx.at> Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 11:10:56 +0100 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Juri Linkov Subject: Re: bug#15961: 24.3.50; display-buffer-at-bottom not at bottom References: <87bo1a3cxo.fsf@mail.jurta.org> In-Reply-To: <87bo1a3cxo.fsf@mail.jurta.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:dCJFwLBz9W9BAQTdXvED/WiGReY3Iy17VIwsvav655mMK+oscvI FmvI2XmiAdbINdepjorbJ0/5yaLd+fdloldiTiBisA9Y2D4OiNIefK/KAR1vYy8Kg7kpTZP GANNmPt2elggdr9yPIkkCBkxjniwssJmXGhyn8f5qLQwLV3sdoK4aX2rqtdZ7vGZ3yqCeA4 WxXCn/sJWZ0JOMpwdPzqQ== X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 15961 Cc: 15961@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) > In emacs -Q that is wide enough to contain two side-by-side windows > in the *scratch* buffer evaluate: > > (add-to-list 'display-buffer-alist '("\\*Completions\\*" display-buffer-at-bottom (nil))) > > (display-buffer (get-buffer-create "*Completions*")) > > The *Completions* window is displayed to the right from the *scratch* window, > not below. Strictly spoken, the new window also appears at the bottom of the frame ;-) An obvious solution to do what you mean is to bind `split-width-threshold' to nil in `display-buffer-at-bottom' as (let (split-width-threshold) (setq window (window--try-to-split-window bottom-window alist))) But this should be better done _around_ calling `display-buffer'. There an application should also bind `split-height-threshold' and `window-min-height' appropriately as well as a specify a `window-height' alist entry. Otherwise, Emacs will often refuse to make a new window which is probably not what we want when displaying *Completions*. martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Nov 24 11:42:29 2013 Received: (at 15961) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Nov 2013 16:42:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42329 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VkclQ-0005BM-TX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Nov 2013 11:42:29 -0500 Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:9422) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VkclO-0005B4-VF for 15961@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Nov 2013 11:42:27 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EABK/CFHO+K4R/2dsb2JhbABEuzWDWRdzgh4BAQQBViMFCws0EhQYDSSIHgbBLZEKA4hhnBmBXoMV X-IPAS-Result: Av8EABK/CFHO+K4R/2dsb2JhbABEuzWDWRdzgh4BAQQBViMFCws0EhQYDSSIHgbBLZEKA4hhnBmBXoMV X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,565,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="40285221" Received: from 206-248-174-17.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([206.248.174.17]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 24 Nov 2013 11:42:21 -0500 Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id D5CB060021; Sun, 24 Nov 2013 11:42:20 -0500 (EST) From: Stefan Monnier To: martin rudalics Subject: Re: bug#15961: 24.3.50; display-buffer-at-bottom not at bottom Message-ID: References: <87bo1a3cxo.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <5291D0B0.6020109@gmx.at> Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 11:42:20 -0500 In-Reply-To: <5291D0B0.6020109@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Sun, 24 Nov 2013 11:10:56 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 15961 Cc: Juri Linkov , 15961@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) > But this should be better done _around_ calling `display-buffer'. I don't think so. Those things should be overridable by the user in display-buffer-alist, so at most they can be passed to display-buffer via its ACTION argument. Stefan From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Nov 24 12:35:42 2013 Received: (at 15961) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Nov 2013 17:35:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42405 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vkdav-0006VZ-RV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Nov 2013 12:35:42 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:59420) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vkdas-0006VI-KY for 15961@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Nov 2013 12:35:40 -0500 Received: from [62.47.56.145] ([62.47.56.145]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MhiPD-1VxcH90WaR-00Muia for <15961@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 24 Nov 2013 18:35:32 +0100 Message-ID: <529238DC.2030305@gmx.at> Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 18:35:24 +0100 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stefan Monnier Subject: Re: bug#15961: 24.3.50; display-buffer-at-bottom not at bottom References: <87bo1a3cxo.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <5291D0B0.6020109@gmx.at> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:xCuSAdECfnxq3sOVRS5JbMNUp3BMXq2ogLLXm6eE/+KUHBir0Mp BZdSgU8WR/P9uq68zAgXjL5xpnp01ETO+z8T2Wi/8gdeG5oLGz9soeXyn+rzfuTYTHhJobN DfUR8fqLUsN7F/3tbdMYEBXMyCWUDXG4jki07ujEtfqnlVmG6++0KgzT2pf3+lNGou/p8Tm /bUIevRJEBlMp0jVU5YLA== X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 15961 Cc: Juri Linkov , 15961@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) >> But this should be better done _around_ calling `display-buffer'. > > I don't think so. Those things should be overridable by the user in > display-buffer-alist, so at most they can be passed to display-buffer > via its ACTION argument. If I bind `split-width-threshold' in `display-buffer-at-bottom', the user won't be able to override it either. So our user has only one option - provide her own action that handles `split-width-threshold' in an appropriate way. And thus she will be able to handle the case where `display-buffer-at-bottom' binds the variable and the case where the application binds it. Or am I missing something? The underlying problem is IMO that we never made things like `split-height-threshold' or `split-window-preferred-function' amenable to `display-buffer-alist'. martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Nov 24 22:22:43 2013 Received: (at 15961) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Nov 2013 03:22:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43204 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vkml0-0005JV-Jm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Nov 2013 22:22:42 -0500 Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:10780) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vkmky-0005JC-IM for 15961@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Nov 2013 22:22:40 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EABK/CFFFxIQK/2dsb2JhbABEuzWDWRdzgh4BAQQBViMFCws0EhQYDSSIHgbBLZEKA4hhnBmBXoMV X-IPAS-Result: Av8EABK/CFFFxIQK/2dsb2JhbABEuzWDWRdzgh4BAQQBViMFCws0EhQYDSSIHgbBLZEKA4hhnBmBXoMV X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,565,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="40315936" Received: from 69-196-132-10.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.196.132.10]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 24 Nov 2013 22:22:35 -0500 Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id D4486600AE; Sun, 24 Nov 2013 22:22:34 -0500 (EST) From: Stefan Monnier To: martin rudalics Subject: Re: bug#15961: 24.3.50; display-buffer-at-bottom not at bottom Message-ID: References: <87bo1a3cxo.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <5291D0B0.6020109@gmx.at> <529238DC.2030305@gmx.at> Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 22:22:34 -0500 In-Reply-To: <529238DC.2030305@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Sun, 24 Nov 2013 18:35:24 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 15961 Cc: Juri Linkov , 15961@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) > If I bind `split-width-threshold' in `display-buffer-at-bottom', the > user won't be able to override it either. Of course, she can, because she can set her display-buffer-alist such that she doesn't go through display-buffer-at-bottom but through another function of her own choosing instead. > The underlying problem is IMO that we never made things like > `split-height-threshold' or `split-window-preferred-function' amenable > to `display-buffer-alist'. Agreed. Stefan From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 25 02:28:33 2013 Received: (at 15961) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Nov 2013 07:28:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43422 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vkqau-00038X-HU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 02:28:32 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:50524) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vkqaq-00038G-Sa for 15961@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 02:28:30 -0500 Received: from [62.47.41.22] ([62.47.41.22]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MRo6b-1WDbtX24Ub-00SzaQ for <15961@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 08:28:22 +0100 Message-ID: <5292FC0E.4050907@gmx.at> Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 08:28:14 +0100 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stefan Monnier Subject: Re: bug#15961: 24.3.50; display-buffer-at-bottom not at bottom References: <87bo1a3cxo.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <5291D0B0.6020109@gmx.at> <529238DC.2030305@gmx.at> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:zDOktJB89FnGKNyd58wHnkyUc2cfKfkopNhIzJMV+34yGg59NLA q6kXrg2YES3EhIKbCoUT6qHt+VZpRszP6U7rmHpEwRyVxIpEFRjP+uSFWPVJ+HMsHo9loC0 HZYnKGzBDLJm3MsJX4ajp7IW07yMBQ+IgUlRRw4fFXmxq4QxQnXzn4pke+WyE+h9XUIslV9 KbIQMcZ5y0ZzePofj0Tbw== X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 15961 Cc: Juri Linkov , 15961@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) >> If I bind `split-width-threshold' in `display-buffer-at-bottom', the >> user won't be able to override it either. > > Of course, she can, because she can set her display-buffer-alist such > that she doesn't go through display-buffer-at-bottom but through another > function of her own choosing instead. So the only viable choice is to not set `split-width-threshold' anywhere and tell the user that if she wants a window below via `display-buffer-at-bottom' she has to customize `split-width-threshold'. martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 25 10:01:52 2013 Received: (at 15961) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Nov 2013 15:01:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44665 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vkxfc-0007sR-1J for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 10:01:52 -0500 Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:9895) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VkxfZ-0007sD-G1 for 15961@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 10:01:50 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EABK/CFFFxIQK/2dsb2JhbABEuzWDWRdzgh4BAQQBViMFCws0EhQYDSSIHgbBLZEKA4hhnBmBXoMV X-IPAS-Result: Av8EABK/CFFFxIQK/2dsb2JhbABEuzWDWRdzgh4BAQQBViMFCws0EhQYDSSIHgbBLZEKA4hhnBmBXoMV X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,565,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="40338654" Received: from 69-196-132-10.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.196.132.10]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 25 Nov 2013 10:01:41 -0500 Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 60A8F603C3; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 10:01:41 -0500 (EST) From: Stefan Monnier To: martin rudalics Subject: Re: bug#15961: 24.3.50; display-buffer-at-bottom not at bottom Message-ID: References: <87bo1a3cxo.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <5291D0B0.6020109@gmx.at> <529238DC.2030305@gmx.at> <5292FC0E.4050907@gmx.at> Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 10:01:41 -0500 In-Reply-To: <5292FC0E.4050907@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Mon, 25 Nov 2013 08:28:14 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 15961 Cc: Juri Linkov , 15961@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) > So the only viable choice is to not set `split-width-threshold' anywhere > and tell the user that if she wants a window below via > `display-buffer-at-bottom' she has to customize `split-width-threshold'. I think we're miscommunicating. I was pointing out that binding split-width-threshold in display-buffer-at-bottom is OK because it can still be overridden by the user. Stefan From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 25 11:42:19 2013 Received: (at 15961) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Nov 2013 16:42:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44769 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VkzEo-0001z4-Jq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 11:42:18 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:49974) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VkzEm-0001yp-9q for 15961@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 11:42:17 -0500 Received: from [62.47.62.195] ([62.47.62.195]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MOOdZ-1VhOCt0clR-005s5p for <15961@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 17:42:10 +0100 Message-ID: <52937DD9.8080801@gmx.at> Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 17:42:01 +0100 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stefan Monnier Subject: Re: bug#15961: 24.3.50; display-buffer-at-bottom not at bottom References: <87bo1a3cxo.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <5291D0B0.6020109@gmx.at> <529238DC.2030305@gmx.at> <5292FC0E.4050907@gmx.at> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:8ca1kvzWlhY62xQRY6jURHzmxlXdxnchReWEJWo18GxoaWaVVC0 cQLa5CFYYss6jY4kTCMzGpmSwG68FqMPTDAiHmecXxudixjjoT+kj9B+xc+dCJ9fLP+GBwJ Eq8zWxrtkNv6Jwy/tZ5gIzbLjUahLGtZ+FpYyGnJo3scoYmhsZd6Y/X1PAU5q4dezahCG8T v+n2d4uChyfaBUIYXa+8w== X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 15961 Cc: Juri Linkov , 15961@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) > I think we're miscommunicating. I was pointing out that binding > split-width-threshold in display-buffer-at-bottom is OK because it can > still be overridden by the user. OK. Committed as revision 115229 on trunk. martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 27 20:20:33 2013 Received: (at 15961-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Nov 2013 01:20:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48186 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VlqHQ-0002x0-RG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 20:20:33 -0500 Received: from ps18281.dreamhost.com ([69.163.218.105]:39716 helo=ps18281.dreamhostps.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VlqHM-0002wl-R0 for 15961-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 20:20:31 -0500 Received: from localhost.jurta.org (ps18281.dreamhostps.com [69.163.218.105]) by ps18281.dreamhostps.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AA6F258B9E936; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 17:20:26 -0800 (PST) From: Juri Linkov To: martin rudalics Subject: Re: bug#15961: 24.3.50; display-buffer-at-bottom not at bottom Organization: JURTA References: <87bo1a3cxo.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <5291D0B0.6020109@gmx.at> <529238DC.2030305@gmx.at> <5292FC0E.4050907@gmx.at> <52937DD9.8080801@gmx.at> Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 02:55:48 +0200 In-Reply-To: <52937DD9.8080801@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Mon, 25 Nov 2013 17:42:01 +0100") Message-ID: <8761rdjqtj.fsf@mail.jurta.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 15961-done Cc: Stefan Monnier , 15961-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) >> I think we're miscommunicating. I was pointing out that binding >> split-width-threshold in display-buffer-at-bottom is OK because it can >> still be overridden by the user. > > OK. Committed as revision 115229 on trunk. Thank you. I confirm that display-buffer-at-bottom works now exactly like its name suggests in all window configurations. From unknown Fri Aug 08 23:32:11 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2013 12:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator