GNU bug report logs -
#15945
chown: accept "[NUMERIC-ID]:" syntax
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
On 21/11/13 17:32, Eric Blake wrote:
> tag 15945 - notabug
> reopen 15945
> thanks
No, thank you :)
> On 11/21/2013 09:24 AM, Tormen wrote:
>
>>>> Leading to:
>>>> chown: invalid spec: `1001:'
>>> Drop the trailing colon.
>> But I want the same effect than
>> chown me: /tmp/bla
> Ooh, you're right. We DO document that:
I started wondering if I missed something extremely obvious here ;)
> Which means my earlier comments aren't quite correct - the existing use
> of [:[GROUP]] in usage text is correct. But I _still_ think we need to
> split into two lines to make it obvious that the argument itself is
> mandatory, as in:
>
> Usage: chown [OPTION]... OWNER[:[GROUP]] FILE...
> or: chown [OPTION]... :[GROUP] FILE...
>
> or even rewrite it along the lines of the info page:
>
> Usage: chown [OPTION]... NEWSPEC FILE...
>
> and document that NEWSPEC is [OWNER][:[GROUP]]
... and mention that either OWNER or GROUP needs to be present ;)
But I prefer the 2 lines ... more concise and allows to quickly grasp
the meaning (IMHO).
Tormen
This bug report was last modified 6 years and 155 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.