GNU bug report logs - #15926
RFE: unlink command already uses 'unlink' call; make 'rm' use 'remove' call

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eric Blake <eblake <at> redhat.com>
To: Pádraig Brady <P <at> draigBrady.com>
Cc: 15926 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Bernhard Voelker <mail <at> bernhard-voelker.de>, Bob Proulx <bob <at> proulx.com>
Subject: bug#15926: RFE: unlink command already uses 'unlink' call; make 'rm' use 'remove' call
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 10:39:16 -0700

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On 11/21/2013 10:38 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 11/21/2013 10:35 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>> as I don't see it as specific to rm.
>> I.E. other tools like chmod etc would have the same requirement,
>> and they might be handled with various shell globbing constructs.
>> Even more generally find(1) could be used to handle arbitrarily
>> many files and commands that don't support recursion internally.
>>
>> Could you explain why rm would get this and say chmod would not?
> 
> Ideally, any command that implements recursion should have the option to
> operate on children only.  You are correct that rm should not be special
> in this regards, so yes, I think chmod should also get it.

Which says that maybe gnulib's fts module needs a new flag for recursion
without visiting the root node, rather than adding ad-hoc root node
exclusion into all clients.

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.