From unknown Fri Aug 08 22:23:54 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#15843 <15843@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#15843 <15843@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: Add cancel-edebug-on-entry or similar Reply-To: bug#15843 <15843@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2025 05:23:54 +0000 retitle 15843 Add cancel-edebug-on-entry or similar reassign 15843 emacs submitter 15843 Nathan Trapuzzano severity 15843 wishlist tag 15843 fixed thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Nov 09 16:42:50 2013 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Nov 2013 21:42:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44708 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VfGIr-0004Aq-Do for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2013 16:42:49 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46219) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VfGIn-0004Ac-J9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2013 16:42:46 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VfGIa-00082s-AO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2013 16:42:40 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:53379) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VfGIa-00082o-6n for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2013 16:42:32 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47931) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VfGIT-0001oW-8A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2013 16:42:32 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VfGIM-00080E-Ad for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2013 16:42:25 -0500 Received: from oproxy6-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com ([67.222.54.6]:34233) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VfGIM-0007zv-0r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2013 16:42:18 -0500 Received: (qmail 16941 invoked by uid 0); 9 Nov 2013 21:41:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO host393.hostmonster.com) (66.147.240.193) by oproxy6.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 9 Nov 2013 21:41:53 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nbtrap.com; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From; bh=D74+JM6hsPS5WFV0/qV3VKTAlMqIsdhFUGIhPkN4Vvw=; b=DSBvDCK18ztb47ntufmTY3ixHRniOg/qUL1RGgaRRqWGndTxybF0lTypb6q1Y7NEkzYfIQQFKZSm7E3RBQqbn/HvRtTN+YR5Hvyt+Nne+EPGzSt5AeF5Sexc2D2vCsPO; Received: from [76.240.196.65] (port=43881 helo=Nathan-GNU) by host393.hostmonster.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:CAMELLIA128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VfGHx-0007U4-7x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2013 14:41:53 -0700 From: Nathan Trapuzzano To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 24.3.50; Edebug feature request Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2013 16:41:52 -0500 Message-ID: <87ob5tckwv.fsf@nbtrap.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130007 (Ma Gnus v0.7) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Identified-User: {1585:host393.hostmonster.com:nbtrapco:nbtrap.com} {sentby:smtp auth 76.240.196.65 authed with nbtrap@nbtrap.com} X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.3 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.3 (----) Edebug would benefit from something like debug.el's `cancel-debug-on-entry'. Especially after stepping through large functions and into other functions therefrom, it's annoying to have to manually re-eval them to remove the extra forms added by Edebug. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Nov 10 23:58:47 2013 Received: (at 15843) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Nov 2013 04:58:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46156 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VfjaJ-0001zO-Db for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 23:58:47 -0500 Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:52169) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VfjaH-0001zB-Bj for 15843@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 23:58:45 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EABK/CFFMCqr1/2dsb2JhbABEuzWDWRdzgh4BAQQBViMFCwsOJhIUGA0kiB4GwS2RCgOIYZwZgV6DFQ X-IPAS-Result: Av8EABK/CFFMCqr1/2dsb2JhbABEuzWDWRdzgh4BAQQBViMFCwsOJhIUGA0kiB4GwS2RCgOIYZwZgV6DFQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,565,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="37546653" Received: from 76-10-170-245.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([76.10.170.245]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 10 Nov 2013 23:58:39 -0500 Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 7EDC860E1D; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 23:58:39 -0500 (EST) From: Stefan Monnier To: Nathan Trapuzzano Subject: Re: bug#15843: 24.3.50; Edebug feature request Message-ID: References: <87ob5tckwv.fsf@nbtrap.com> Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 23:58:39 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87ob5tckwv.fsf@nbtrap.com> (Nathan Trapuzzano's message of "Sat, 09 Nov 2013 16:41:52 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 15843 Cc: 15843@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) > Edebug would benefit from something like debug.el's > `cancel-debug-on-entry'. Especially after stepping through large > functions and into other functions therefrom, it's annoying to have to > manually re-eval them to remove the extra forms added by Edebug. Patch welcome, tho usually I just use `C-M-x c'. Stefan From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 11 06:02:47 2013 Received: (at 15843) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Nov 2013 11:02:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46356 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VfpGZ-0002R5-6H for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 06:02:47 -0500 Received: from oproxy17-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com ([74.220.201.171]:38439) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VfpGX-0002Qw-0g for 15843@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 06:02:45 -0500 Received: (qmail 18655 invoked by uid 0); 11 Nov 2013 11:02:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO host393.hostmonster.com) (66.147.240.193) by oproxy17-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 11 Nov 2013 11:02:40 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nbtrap.com; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From; bh=0C5ULtF9SkF3nOFW0bhguXt2wpAJ4QBNoCWXa09SWeg=; b=sU57HzFxUiCt3td3BzRfdtLo3gpTlgKbTZcSfuTbLYHi5HS/1UQ/LrV84B68M/8w//ZO41RjAqWvdFSN27cPhFGtN9e/BcSsDgNcdV+3EdBq6J7t6rr4IG4r5qKTjlyE; Received: from [50.90.253.209] (port=60201 helo=Nathan-GNU) by host393.hostmonster.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:CAMELLIA128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VfpGS-0003nu-1J; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 04:02:40 -0700 From: Nathan Trapuzzano To: Stefan Monnier Subject: Re: bug#15843: 24.3.50; Edebug feature request References: <87ob5tckwv.fsf@nbtrap.com> Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 06:02:37 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Sun, 10 Nov 2013 23:58:39 -0500") Message-ID: <87siv32oc2.fsf@nbtrap.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130007 (Ma Gnus v0.7) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Identified-User: {1585:host393.hostmonster.com:nbtrapco:nbtrap.com} {sentby:smtp auth 50.90.253.209 authed with nbtrap@nbtrap.com} X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 15843 Cc: 15843@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) Stefan Monnier writes: > `C-M-x c'. You mean just `C-M-x'? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 11 08:37:28 2013 Received: (at 15843) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Nov 2013 13:37:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46714 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VfrgF-0007YF-Kh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:37:27 -0500 Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:63664) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VfrgD-0007Y3-OH for 15843@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:37:26 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EABK/CFFMCqr1/2dsb2JhbABEuzWDWRdzgh8BBVYjEAsOJhIUGA0kiCTBLZEKA4hhnBmBXoMV X-IPAS-Result: Av8EABK/CFFMCqr1/2dsb2JhbABEuzWDWRdzgh8BBVYjEAsOJhIUGA0kiCTBLZEKA4hhnBmBXoMV X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,565,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="37561078" Received: from 76-10-170-245.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([76.10.170.245]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 11 Nov 2013 08:37:20 -0500 Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id F122F6064E; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:37:19 -0500 (EST) From: Stefan Monnier To: Nathan Trapuzzano Subject: Re: bug#15843: 24.3.50; Edebug feature request Message-ID: References: <87ob5tckwv.fsf@nbtrap.com> <87siv32oc2.fsf@nbtrap.com> Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:37:19 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87siv32oc2.fsf@nbtrap.com> (Nathan Trapuzzano's message of "Mon, 11 Nov 2013 06:02:37 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 15843 Cc: 15843@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) >> `C-M-x c'. > You mean just `C-M-x'? No: C-M-x "de-edebugs" the function, but I need a subsequent `c' to continue the execution that was interrupted where I didn't want it. Stefan From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 11 08:41:48 2013 Received: (at 15843) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Nov 2013 13:41:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46718 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VfrkS-0007fW-2k for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:41:48 -0500 Received: from oproxy12-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com ([50.87.16.10]:38101) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VfrkO-0007fI-7B for 15843@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:41:45 -0500 Received: (qmail 2733 invoked by uid 0); 11 Nov 2013 13:41:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO host393.hostmonster.com) (66.147.240.193) by oproxy12.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 11 Nov 2013 13:41:40 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nbtrap.com; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From; bh=o9XiWaMLTLR2cOfZDZrnVb8bHxSiJiqHHLJbGnJSKz0=; b=KeVWP83aDViPB8tKX2W3+st+w4py0aEBo3OyJrHJRKzawdFouuDCqC7mH+K3PA9zONQL+wvVuIdztzHvUqAS2cxLkyMmIAwCe44lyTNmpNASHBz2sTVauPYZfjh5cnCr; Received: from [50.90.253.209] (port=33702 helo=Nathan-GNU) by host393.hostmonster.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:CAMELLIA128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VfrkK-0003e7-0c; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 06:41:40 -0700 From: Nathan Trapuzzano To: Stefan Monnier Subject: Re: bug#15843: 24.3.50; Edebug feature request References: <87ob5tckwv.fsf@nbtrap.com> <87siv32oc2.fsf@nbtrap.com> Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:41:38 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:37:19 -0500") Message-ID: <87d2m7rr71.fsf@nbtrap.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130007 (Ma Gnus v0.7) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Identified-User: {1585:host393.hostmonster.com:nbtrapco:nbtrap.com} {sentby:smtp auth 50.90.253.209 authed with nbtrap@nbtrap.com} X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 15843 Cc: 15843@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) Stefan Monnier writes: > No: C-M-x "de-edebugs" the function, but I need a subsequent `c' to > continue the execution that was interrupted where I didn't want it. Oh yeah, that's what I do to. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Apr 01 22:27:48 2017 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Apr 2017 02:27:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56235 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cuVF6-0001hb-Fy for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2017 22:27:48 -0400 Received: from mail-it0-f48.google.com ([209.85.214.48]:35752) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cuVF5-0001hP-5M for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2017 22:27:47 -0400 Received: by mail-it0-f48.google.com with SMTP id y18so31368658itc.0 for ; Sat, 01 Apr 2017 19:27:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=FYt0hFnvW30SwnSLTDM6uygc0Ea5+/1BpY+bxAT0DXY=; b=tsOjnbyl5i9koxd2VZAsUjpoG+y04fbD9cxBLGSVQ6pVYXiu76eaPzC+s23aPAcip3 Z8r8pWH75+hQwZ6OJT1BBg3o00g/crFRoAxjZP87z+HIj0b6FkQiFAXX61sPr+Wg3dU/ ESiaOt03yBUzZEhGgAr1/di6lC6pf8Sgusyz9eS7p6R8CcgQ3X8uvyc4SFSAdZbfoGNO uVkbTxcZfMPDljjte85VMwTtrNskjHg9p7fq3rVmT6HbwnxyBYaLKerEvjZCUmc7gBQH d0j25DQIll83SyO8WjSZZER+BcR1FcMgb/l+a9vfVk0fLOjwSR78weizurU8piYnfi7P X1GA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version; bh=FYt0hFnvW30SwnSLTDM6uygc0Ea5+/1BpY+bxAT0DXY=; b=fYO4T7TE7FbL1Z4lQxk0jwNB72ht2RGALkw6Qty+ydw3vD+4IyqiQwtVOS/+GsJpOD bIxgWdWD9QM3I2VoUQ4j1CfC/iLmsDPuYVlSYzZNsiKORKnxFyoqEi9vtF7lU3mKqswx SnF1ASokh43yKMCJ7kuu0QQW2horDFcQrDuL4aDXU8KSGG8nIdHX2e3hb1f7SWVKnL9H C6L4y0w5UA06hJ0zQCiaEaimvX7t4opVZBW1bFx3a91CdXMpOOUYnXq4T1/blftLqIaw xk/dtMU9sz/CQZO4ckmLB7yvUcQtzP1fDzkt99GXKCCtYvqTsMm+x0jDz5jLQgJYbM+s oODw== X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H2jzBcCZ41aH8yL26I4O1fIyEKvsb+H3Hur8yUSx/0/qxVwPtPY AeeFPRpctjg0mQEN X-Received: by 10.36.196.8 with SMTP id v8mr4468997itf.115.1491100061583; Sat, 01 Apr 2017 19:27:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zony ([45.2.7.65]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id h71sm5640135ioe.9.2017.04.01.19.27.40 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sat, 01 Apr 2017 19:27:40 -0700 (PDT) From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: control message for bug #15843 Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2017 22:29:04 -0400 Message-ID: <874ly7zgnj.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) retitle 15843 Add cancel-edebug-on-entry or similar quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 20 05:16:49 2019 Received: (at 15843) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Oct 2019 09:16:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53780 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iM7KS-0002b3-W9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 05:16:49 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:43412) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iM7KQ-0002au-W9 for 15843@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 05:16:47 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iM7KM-0005NC-IH; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 11:16:44 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Nathan Trapuzzano Subject: Re: bug#15843: 24.3.50; Edebug feature request References: <87ob5tckwv.fsf@nbtrap.com> Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2019 11:16:42 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87ob5tckwv.fsf@nbtrap.com> (Nathan Trapuzzano's message of "Sat, 09 Nov 2013 16:41:52 -0500") Message-ID: <87r237epz9.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Nathan Trapuzzano writes: > Edebug would benefit from something like debug.el's > `cancel-debug-on-entry'. Especially after stepping through large > functions and into other functions therefrom, it's annoying to have to > manu [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 15843 Cc: 15843@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Nathan Trapuzzano writes: > Edebug would benefit from something like debug.el's > `cancel-debug-on-entry'. Especially after stepping through large > functions and into other functions therefrom, it's annoying to have to > manually re-eval them to remove the extra forms added by Edebug. I think this sounds like a useful command -- I often find myself having edebug-instrumented a whole bunch of functions, and having to manually re-eval all of them is tedious. So a command like `edebug-cancel-all-functions' would be nice, and I looked into the bowels of edebug.el to see whether that would be easy... and... I think so? I think we basically have to go through all the symbols and see whether any of those are edebugged, and if so, call `edebug-unwrap*' on them and set the function definition to that? Or is there a better way? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 20 05:30:45 2019 Received: (at 15843) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Oct 2019 09:30:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53784 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iM7Xx-0002xD-D2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 05:30:45 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:43592) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iM7Xw-0002x4-Id for 15843@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 05:30:44 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iM7Xr-0005TK-Fd; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 11:30:43 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Nathan Trapuzzano Subject: Re: bug#15843: 24.3.50; Edebug feature request References: <87ob5tckwv.fsf@nbtrap.com> <87r237epz9.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2019 11:30:38 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87r237epz9.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sun, 20 Oct 2019 11:16:42 +0200") Message-ID: <87zhhvhigx.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > I think we basically have to go through all the symbols and see whether > any of those are edebugged, and if so, call `edebug-unwrap*' on them and > set the function definition to that? Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 15843 Cc: 15843@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > I think we basically have to go through all the symbols and see whether > any of those are edebugged, and if so, call `edebug-unwrap*' on them and > set the function definition to that? I wrote a function like that just to test, and to my surprise, it seems to work in the test cases I had, so I installed it. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 20 05:30:51 2019 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Oct 2019 09:30:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53787 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iM7Y2-0002xV-Ls for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 05:30:50 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:43606) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iM7Y1-0002xO-3B for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 05:30:49 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iM7Xy-0005TT-BV for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 11:30:48 +0200 Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2019 11:30:45 +0200 Message-Id: <87y2xfhigq.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #15843 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 15843 fixed close 15843 27.1 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 15843 fixed close 15843 27.1 quit From unknown Fri Aug 08 22:23:54 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2019 12:24:11 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator