Subject: Re: bug#15843: 24.3.50; Edebug feature request

From: Stefan Monnier <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:37:19 -0500

>> `C-M-x c'.
> You mean just `C-M-x'?

No: C-M-x "de-edebugs" the function, but I need a subsequent `c' to
continue the execution that was interrupted where I didn't want it.

        Stefan