GNU bug report logs - #15800
24.3.50; hebrew: describe-input-method, case sensitive or not

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Jambunathan K <kjambunathan <at> gmail.com>

Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 15:05:02 UTC

Severity: minor

Found in version 24.3.50

Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #26 received at 15800 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jambunathan K <kjambunathan <at> gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 15800 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#15800: 24.3.50;
 hebrew: describe-input-method, case sensitive or not
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 00:05:59 +0530
Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:

> The 'S' label does not mean "press upper-case S", it says that this
> key will produce an upper-case S when used with Shift, and "some
> hebrew char" when used without Shift.

If English Characters are not first class citizens of the script under
consideration, why even have them in first place.  Having a Uppercase
ASCII but not having lowercase ASCII seems pretty useless to me. i.e.,
it gives me a feature that I don't need in the first place.

Anyways, this bug is a good excuse to re-look at why such a decision was
made and whether it is actually useful in practice.

ps-1: I am using English and ASCII in a crude way.  But it is clear what
I mean.

ps-2: Only reason uppercase ASCII may have been needed was to type out
Roman Numerals while editing legendary texts.

As for docstring, I need to sleep over it.




This bug report was last modified 11 years and 204 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.