GNU bug report logs - #15797
24.3.50; Info: Mention cache-long-scans

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Jambunathan K <kjambunathan <at> gmail.com>

Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2013 21:35:01 UTC

Severity: minor

Tags: notabug

Found in version 24.3.50

Done: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #71 received at 15797 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Jambunathan K <kjambunathan <at> gmail.com>
Cc: michael_heerdegen <at> web.de, 15797 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca
Subject: Re: bug#15797: 24.3.50; Info: Mention cache-long-scans
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 16:15:46 +0200
> From: Jambunathan K <kjambunathan <at> gmail.com>
> Cc: monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca,  michael_heerdegen <at> web.de,  15797 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 18:43:21 +0530
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
> 
> > Given that the variable is now on by default, and I see no reason why
> > anyone would might want to turn it off, except fro debugging, does it
> > still make sense to have this advertised in the user manual?  If so,
> > why?
> 
> If you are super-confident, remove the variable :-).

I asked why it would make sense to have it in user manual if it is
_not_ removed, but is ON by default.

> Otherwise, re-open the bug

I didn't close it.




This bug report was last modified 11 years and 254 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.