From unknown Thu Jun 19 14:05:56 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#15785 <15785@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#15785 <15785@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: Problem with incrementing date when clock goes back Reply-To: bug#15785 <15785@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 21:05:56 +0000 retitle 15785 Problem with incrementing date when clock goes back reassign 15785 coreutils submitter 15785 Samuel Penn severity 15785 normal tag 15785 notabug thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Nov 01 12:04:53 2013 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Nov 2013 16:04:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57723 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VcHDQ-00031D-Qo for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 12:04:53 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56754) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VcHAk-0002ve-Cw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 12:02:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VcHAa-00022T-1P for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 12:02:01 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:36095) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VcHAZ-00022O-Uh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 12:01:55 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58410) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VcHAV-0003l5-4W for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 12:01:55 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VcHAQ-0001zr-AM for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 12:01:51 -0400 Received: from [212.69.38.51] (port=27560 helo=mail.perforce.co.uk) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VcHAQ-0001zF-4W for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 12:01:46 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.perforce.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id F06E010BC4DD for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 15:24:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from blast.perforce.co.uk (blast.perforce.co.uk [10.1.4.5]) by mail.perforce.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id E165610C30EF for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 15:24:04 +0000 (GMT) Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 15:21:37 +0000 (GMT) From: Samuel Penn To: bug-coreutils@gnu.org Message-ID: <2058738741.3569962.1383319297290.JavaMail.root@perforce.com> In-Reply-To: <231645003.3568690.1383317684557.JavaMail.root@perforce.com> Subject: Problem with incrementing date when clock goes back MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.1.3.93] X-Mailer: Zimbra 7.2.3_GA_2872 (ZimbraWebClient - GC30 (Linux)/7.2.3_GA_2872) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 12:04:51 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) The "date" command seems to have a problem when the clock goes back. Last Sunday (27th October 2013), the time changed from BST to GMT, so we had a day with 25 hours in it. Running the following gives unexpected results: # date -s "2013/10/27 00:00:00" Sun Oct 27 00:00:00 BST 2013 # date --date="+1 day" Sun Oct 27 23:00:04 GMT 2013 # date --date="tomorrow" Sun Oct 27 23:00:08 GMT 2013 I would expect that both "+1 day" and "tomorrow" to move the date to the next day, but neither do so. Whilst I can accept that "+1 day" actually adds 24 hours (and therefore gives the above result), I would always expect "tomorrow" to give tomorrow, regardless of time changes, and regardless of the current time. This issue seems to have been raised (and 'fixed') before: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2003-09/msg00001.html The version of date/coreutils seems to be: GNU coreutils 8.12.197-032bb I'm running Ubuntu 12.04 -- Samuel Penn Software Engineer Perforce Software -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Perforce Software. Finally, the recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. Perforce Software accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. Perforce Software UK Ltd is registered in England and Wales as company no. 3816019 at the following address: West Forest Gate, Wellington Road, Wokingham, RG40 2AT, UK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Nov 01 12:26:42 2013 Received: (at 15785) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Nov 2013 16:26:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57768 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VcHYX-0004io-Co for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 12:26:42 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:37202) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VcHYS-0004iW-Jd for 15785@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 12:26:38 -0400 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rA1GQZZG019427 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 1 Nov 2013 12:26:35 -0400 Received: from [10.3.113.175] (ovpn-113-175.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.175]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rA1GQYpL017107; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 12:26:34 -0400 Message-ID: <5273D63A.9080603@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 10:26:34 -0600 From: Eric Blake Organization: Red Hat, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Samuel Penn , 15785@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#15785: Problem with incrementing date when clock goes back References: <2058738741.3569962.1383319297290.JavaMail.root@perforce.com> In-Reply-To: <2058738741.3569962.1383319297290.JavaMail.root@perforce.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 OpenPGP: url=http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KMeWAXTnAV37UkEiDi8b4lOvmOBC3UThM" X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.24 X-Spam-Score: -5.5 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 15785 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.5 (-----) This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --KMeWAXTnAV37UkEiDi8b4lOvmOBC3UThM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 11/01/2013 09:21 AM, Samuel Penn wrote: >=20 > The "date" command seems to have a problem when the clock goes back.=20 > Last Sunday (27th October 2013), the time changed from BST to GMT,=20 > so we had a day with 25 hours in it. Yep. And it is a FAQ that 25-hour days mess with relative date calculations: https://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/faq/coreutils-faq.html#The-date-co= mmand-is-not-working-right_002e The FAQ also suggests basing your computations around noon rather than midnight, so that even the fuzz of daylight savings won't get in the way of you landing in the correct day. > Whilst I can accept that "+1 day" actually adds 24 hours (and > therefore gives the above result), I would always expect "tomorrow" > to give tomorrow, regardless of time changes, and regardless of the > current time. You are welcome to submit a patch to change the date parser (now maintained in gnulib) to attempt that. But even in the current sources, "tomorrow" applies a tDAY_SHIFT of 1, but after applying the shift, we then perform timezone normalization, which ends up treating the shift as only 24 hours. >=20 > This issue seems to have been raised (and 'fixed') before: >=20 > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2003-09/msg00001.html Thanks for digging up that thread; it corresponds to commit 54feed1c, released in coreutils 5.0.91. I'd have to do more investigation (actually building 5.0.90 and 5.0.91 to compare how they behaved) to see if it made a difference then, and if so, if we have regressed in the meantime. Hence, I'm leaving this bug open a bit longer (even though it is just one of many bug reports on the theme that typically appear twice a year). --=20 Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org --KMeWAXTnAV37UkEiDi8b4lOvmOBC3UThM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Public key at http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJSc9Y6AAoJEKeha0olJ0NqYjwH/1t/L3IlISPqlTVGKQcys4W0 2G7zmLv+PHrZ+KGZDSeX3ckLv5uJWHAHy9rKDddP2aZSvRZ/EuUYI/pUxuQmekI+ 7Y8ZFrLBUFDG1eePQWml0tPTPiK7QH46dzBUidLQUyYem/nZuxwniwtwSLzGlaFb v4t9TEQ5Gj3JBMwOKstmhXVA49d57HRZt+0fp9Iv+14JSrrcjuB+8nZ8cGJd6HiU mj4L7VSRYHBvRMcXO6+uWN0L04jTru97AyW/LpG1mI3iE1Yf3tpNX69pLsckZ97U w1pBNAlqXQLg3rOwet+KqZHsjxkqqjIijWSIC6VcUBZ4u3skMJht4GaeKaeZ2Qc= =mRY7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --KMeWAXTnAV37UkEiDi8b4lOvmOBC3UThM-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Nov 01 12:56:47 2013 Received: (at 15785) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Nov 2013 16:56:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57815 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VcI1e-0005Zd-EM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 12:56:46 -0400 Received: from [212.69.38.51] (port=40254 helo=mail.perforce.co.uk) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VcI1b-0005ZK-5q for 15785@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 12:56:43 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.perforce.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 030D610C2CF6; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 16:56:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from blast.perforce.co.uk (blast.perforce.co.uk [10.1.4.5]) by mail.perforce.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBFF310C30EF; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 16:56:36 +0000 (GMT) Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 16:54:08 +0000 (GMT) From: Samuel Penn To: Eric Blake Message-ID: <261993463.3573707.1383324848847.JavaMail.root@perforce.com> In-Reply-To: <5273D63A.9080603@redhat.com> Subject: Re: bug#15785: Problem with incrementing date when clock goes back MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.1.3.93] X-Mailer: Zimbra 7.2.3_GA_2872 (ZimbraWebClient - GC30 (Linux)/7.2.3_GA_2872) X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Eric Blake wrote: > On 11/01/2013 09:21 AM, Samuel Penn wrote: > > > > The "date" command seems to have a problem when the clock goes > > back. > > Last Sunday (27th October 2013), the time changed from BST to GMT, > > so we had a day with 25 hours in it. > > Yep. And it is a FAQ that 25-hour days mess with relative date > calculations: > https://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/faq/coreutils-faq.html#The-date-command-is-not-working-right_002e [...] Content analysis details: (1.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.3 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 15785 Cc: 15785@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Eric Blake wrote: > On 11/01/2013 09:21 AM, Samuel Penn wrote: > > > > The "date" command seems to have a problem when the clock goes > > back. > > Last Sunday (27th October 2013), the time changed from BST to GMT, > > so we had a day with 25 hours in it. > > Yep. And it is a FAQ that 25-hour days mess with relative date > calculations: > https://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/faq/coreutils-faq.html#The-date-command-is-not-working-right_002e [...] Content analysis details: (1.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.3 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS Eric Blake wrote: > On 11/01/2013 09:21 AM, Samuel Penn wrote: > > > > The "date" command seems to have a problem when the clock goes > > back. > > Last Sunday (27th October 2013), the time changed from BST to GMT, > > so we had a day with 25 hours in it. > > Yep. And it is a FAQ that 25-hour days mess with relative date > calculations: > https://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/faq/coreutils-faq.html#The-date-command-is-not-working-right_002e > The FAQ also suggests basing your computations around noon rather > than midnight, so that even the fuzz of daylight savings won't get in the > way of you landing in the correct day. I did have a skim through that, but I didn't see the "tomorrow" issue mentioned for DST changes. Setting to Noon does mean you lose the current time, in the case when you want to preserve time (as best as possible) and just change the day. It does feel very wrong that "tomorrow" doesn't always give tomorrow. It would seem better to give an unexpected time in this case, rather than an unexpected day. IMO. > Hence, I'm leaving this bug open a bit longer (even though > it is just one of many bug reports on the theme that typically appear > twice a year). Hmm, I wonder why that is. Okay, thanks for taking the time to respond. -- Samuel Penn Software Engineer Perforce Software -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Perforce Software. Finally, the recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. Perforce Software accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. Perforce Software UK Ltd is registered in England and Wales as company no. 3816019 at the following address: West Forest Gate, Wellington Road, Wokingham, RG40 2AT, UK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Oct 19 19:14:10 2018 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Oct 2018 23:14:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59981 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gDdy6-0004jh-Ix for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 19:14:10 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-f172.google.com ([209.85.215.172]:37634) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gDdy4-0004jS-DJ for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 19:14:08 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-f172.google.com with SMTP id c10-v6so16378310pgq.4 for ; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 16:14:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=to:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=89N7FWHIQHjZJJV6+TLF+q9wldRaB57sUNVNuIge/V4=; b=scIZI3NCLx2wOWUdrYAXBHj4QvCbILEsvWOY16NSfzkLetKLrAvxqBQhVzn1CFSUYE bwl4yMz+5/LLLVFPc4J5UUKemVi3dbz2I9iVvpi5jo85tkOiG1BH1pt+v2088P6QAneF S50bUGZu5ojJhYl63md1ILnln2mhOSgt0RasfE2lMQuHRFdaXYfQ/rMlxz2sBPwHJCkh FWZ29jcqrRxjj5JKk/8smTAY3JIKgHSKheoxgR/3RbkYDOlDjge/tcFaQ7Ov/SmmI03t Sn9rkkzCPwyU2kK8zAk+nx5els863ADYy0Qb0jWhKMDYFydxN7waeQEbapQWJkBv1YE+ NO3A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=89N7FWHIQHjZJJV6+TLF+q9wldRaB57sUNVNuIge/V4=; b=f8rgyonzRzEOfWnAAeCKfk+On1MGYZ5jjWUXWjJuUXSj6xqk4kDWhw0TBOiHeuDTtP 3qhGe9XnpTYDYSp+4BDNa78yBh1qD5yWzr821FGooKxuVEY3Bt4nsg3nuAl/jQdtKa4U a/McZTMVvy5+/3lxmRMIwTixAXn0pI4o6ypikvsvPaJVSSZHCQDRTdMgPSiSTzZVCZZE fDJSq1qZDLUd0tdCeHkaCIFtIa8cg3kaTtAQaIrAsKbjRKsRFgOfILwtJvNKcN6SbYLz U6mwamujmozYMRTI2lmEjgK6+PJtJgTkbmvaXEhX1y0G/+XMmbqbtxC4PkuMt5uPqSpc uzww== X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfohkEnrdn0L1aHPxWAjZWkEfiumCtL7HXVVcb7LdXDnhIHH0Qsyo O/2QYCp5LQc2TF/TYtENSEru5mg7nSo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV63v5CE6AYVl28KnPiS5r/Msj9dXdNNxMFYjzxjPQd50RRh0aYUHK+6a4d+aT6TVIpLVg/Gs2Q== X-Received: by 2002:a63:5a0d:: with SMTP id o13-v6mr34463739pgb.267.1539990842315; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 16:14:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tomato.housegordon.com (moose.housegordon.com. [184.68.105.38]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id k12-v6sm23006767pgo.34.2018.10.19.16.14.00 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 19 Oct 2018 16:14:01 -0700 (PDT) To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Assaf Gordon Message-ID: Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 17:14:00 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: merge 15785 11098 [...] Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (assafgordon[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.215.172 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.215.172 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header 0.2 NO_SUBJECT Extra score for no subject X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) merge 15785 11098 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Oct 24 17:58:59 2018 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Oct 2018 21:58:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40921 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gFRB5-0003LK-3e for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 17:58:59 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-f172.google.com ([209.85.215.172]:36731) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gFRB3-0003L4-EM for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 17:58:57 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-f172.google.com with SMTP id l6-v6so2982731pgp.3 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 14:58:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=to:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ybwsFcZOJ4XqnENbrZz6Y7xHX9QN259PKfsbURBotQ4=; b=VbrP2ABK8aqPLCrwT0sFctGdbUJeKlXxIvXwzmhEszK9MAqpnud6inJzek2SCSztIa bL/V0xxdRd1kv7UIwIi8B/LFWeYRSjbfGkGGkZG5bltrD2ndt2aA0RUeeDUWCda9xfFx 0Qgt/Gx49X4okdQJ2GJ+fwJGPfmTI2aCr4pH1wjsHGx4FnD0UU8uMgxLuQ/8GFYVhEeY 5qPFh/STWFaAUEAUM3JnU6CDJsF5CBekfsoBVNiSsECBPciOOsVMCTvQHBi/HrNT8c3n xMPVeh+74zr0qkfm0VV4jzG+xk2P6GVM6tC0U1ToWcRRrUgOl3hrJnujTJ1knvDOjVOr PIqw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ybwsFcZOJ4XqnENbrZz6Y7xHX9QN259PKfsbURBotQ4=; b=Qqd+Fi5382LoLqnv6OCtoWq4exbGIwtOsi/sqMsFmRsVbc00q5rE/d/e0dyCN0vVjE tRXBbCc3TyVL8FUVhFwAVMK1/DTJWIn0Gt4mL9pI51ka4x3yWn8PIJrHnH06CjvA0sdy lBXh1L2fEWbelHD+CvUR+BWwYkJj432g00daUq5B1BbNi3zyJ0RzSINj5C7lmEaQnfdh sD9ROzgCYYkCP+4Zx8oTy7oOfyz9GtEE4pZ3CsqNDUJDpBRPDU3UlqkIUNUgAGgbBQKv jZ5RzN4xHkvfwQkoGvCm2pknhkzqo5tbNO5Da8EnYWrGvtQDgCsQEsBS6sMZVVeheSOU h1Bg== X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gJlDPbg6AHgp6Vb2t8pEMfqoALoEWL692FHfDkFrxXGD01g/ygo e0vlti+Sl7rSAjAf7XhWk49rA+XK1OM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5exvW4CCbCrNz7wkfiZVbqDCk30Zqy0z1VOoClEysTLNPu08mn6CslukvPuOUZb4i9u9KWiZg== X-Received: by 2002:a63:4e4e:: with SMTP id o14-v6mr4194100pgl.181.1540418330717; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 14:58:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tomato.housegordon.com (moose.housegordon.com. [184.68.105.38]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id u190-v6sm22723811pgu.3.2018.10.24.14.58.49 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 24 Oct 2018 14:58:49 -0700 (PDT) To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Assaf Gordon Message-ID: <56b2fc82-5675-fd62-419a-a7117f131c09@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 15:58:48 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: close 11098 [...] Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.215.172 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (assafgordon[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header 0.2 NO_SUBJECT Extra score for no subject X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) close 11098 From unknown Thu Jun 19 14:05:56 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 12:24:03 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator