From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Oct 30 14:30:00 2013 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Oct 2013 18:30:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53256 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VbaWm-0000Se-3i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:30:00 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54858) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VbaWk-0000SR-5w for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:29:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VbaWe-0005fR-37 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:29:53 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:47591) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VbaWd-0005fL-W2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:29:52 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56574) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VbaWc-00088v-Qk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:29:51 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VbaWb-0005ej-PO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:29:50 -0400 Received: from mail-we0-x236.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::236]:43746) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VbaWb-0005dw-Hx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:29:49 -0400 Received: by mail-we0-f182.google.com with SMTP id t61so1720835wes.27 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 11:29:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=15dvbb0hs1aLtytP6HO2wNEBXvt319o23ZHB9KQ7fyM=; b=DetfttgPj/ATMOaQRpLWp5WhXmtcoPCKQdfi71JfZfaKRAs9T55FnJon4SkCuI08wi PYR43WpoLYNXWnptDH4ezVgiuzF7Adn+5TohtvXZCFRHp1InPNQ8INQwc2So3ChmdSov sRoFIoEqIgRESXdqVdKbGR3BvW8Zd8B4J2E1DDVZ+AE7Mw3C+2/G8cUBHAjVGACw6PGG dN5RgK7Y4PbzL5gTH7zeuM8nu6Zu3BFrcnzmB67/KuC4yqvexJzJ0pOsRqix/RPLAn7k FwZYqeR2LYbqe0WzVWpJxUV2STdvO/d1Qfi2V3jfwhyjM6wVzZoA+qjdhc9PTGoMTKz/ pcqQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.201.225 with SMTP id kd1mr6259627wjc.35.1383157788599; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 11:29:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.217.49.73 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 11:29:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:29:48 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Fwd: Small problem with "unmark" in *Buffer List* From: Alp Aker To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b86f172a86cf004e9f98425 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) --047d7b86f172a86cf004e9f98425 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Forwarding from emacs-devel in order to get a bug number. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Alin Soare Date: Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 2:55 AM Subject: Small problem with "unmark" in *Buffer List* To: emacs-devel@gnu.org When I mark a buffer for saving (S marker in the 3rd column), the unmark does not clean the flag. This happens because the unmark does simply so: (tabulated-list-set-col 0 " " t) and the "S" marker is on the 3rd column, and it's not cleared. Now I discovered that in fact "Unmark" command should be called "unmark the deletion". Info page, 19.5 Operating on Several Buffers, quote: `u' Remove all flags from the current line, and move down (`Buffer-menu-unmark'). This is not true. Either press "g" to revert the buffer, or re-define "Buffer-menu-unmark" to really unmark the buffers. --047d7b86f172a86cf004e9f98425 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Forwarding from emacs-devel in order to get a bug number.<= br>
---------- Forwarded message ----------From: Alin Soare <= as1789@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 2:55 AM
Subject: Small problem with "unm= ark" in *Buffer List*
To: em= acs-devel@gnu.org


When I mark a buffer= for saving (S marker in the 3rd column), the unmark does not clean the fla= g.

=A0This happens because the unmark does simply so:

=A0 =A0 (tabulated-list-set-col 0 " " t)
and the "S" marker is on the 3rd column, and it's no= t cleared.

Now I discovered that in fact "Unm= ark" command should be called "unmark the deletion".

Info page, 19.5 Operating on Several Buffers, quote:

`u'
=A0 =A0 =A0Remove all flags f= rom the current line, and move down
=A0 =A0 =A0(`Buffer-menu-unma= rk').

This is not true. Either press "g" to r= evert the buffer, or re-define "Buffer-menu-unmark" to really unm= ark the buffers.




--047d7b86f172a86cf004e9f98425-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Oct 30 14:38:59 2013 Received: (at 15761-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Oct 2013 18:38:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53273 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VbafT-0000jB-EH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:38:59 -0400 Received: from mail-we0-f178.google.com ([74.125.82.178]:59276) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VbafQ-0000iu-SY for 15761-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:38:57 -0400 Received: by mail-we0-f178.google.com with SMTP id q59so1688764wes.37 for <15761-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 11:38:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=53EPa7+U7/yZkcIIJja7M4cmsJfgFgVDmMvJ9GgdEJ4=; b=Shjgz0TMCsOZbbTBKCjz+993roFcri3hoYZbhUFUZNoSeQn5p6UKU0kzEbT6KYiv/R Nbjm7b0lar24gzRnQgKpGPBD46XHGKcdTUsMqn+XkgZhjjv9v4bP2OKfVoOMYG+FECXJ NO3PMmjMhfUk+yU65JjGnyGJvYQQlQv8JTUpnC94V6nY5Rpmpw+OK73DYMCZyhTuZkdi Zs4tOJQ3YJXd/vgvPjexwJcE2QN3mEKeUO6T0AP+nGSlsUL/PmN5Jt382bM7L4lbqQVw T/k+wWNfMiT8O7k1R9AAwj/XyOeNYzUJ4tDTmy1jL67Ot3RoWTLX+cb8oRIIX8IaIkxO 8fpw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.212.51 with SMTP id nh19mr3416593wic.52.1383158331028; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 11:38:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.217.49.73 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 11:38:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:38:50 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Fwd: Small problem with "unmark" in *Buffer List* From: Alp Aker To: 15761-done@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c35760fd3a5104e9f9a43f X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 15761-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) --001a11c35760fd3a5104e9f9a43f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Fixed in r114874. --001a11c35760fd3a5104e9f9a43f Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Fixed in r114874.
--001a11c35760fd3a5104e9f9a43f-- From unknown Sun Jun 22 13:37:30 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 12:24:03 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator