GNU bug report logs -
#15757
"unknown" for uname -p related
Previous Next
Full log
Message #8 received at 15757 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
forcemerge 15757 13001
thanks
On 10/30/2013 06:21 PM, Jeffrin Jose wrote:
> hello ,
>
> ------------cut-x-here---------
> $uname -p
> unknown
> $uname -m
> x86_64
> $uname -a
> Linux debian 3.11-1-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.11.5-1 (2013-10-17) x86_64 GNU/Linux
> $
> ---------cut-x-here----------
>
> i will attach the output of cpuid command.
> http://www.ka9q.net/code/cpuid/
>
> I think it is not a bug to show "unknown" for -p
> my processor is AMD A-Series
>
> is possible to make "unknown" to the correct processor type.
>
> Thanks.
> /Jeffrin.
Thanks for the report.
This one has already been discussed:
http://bugs.gnu.org/13001
There are several patches maintained in various distributions
for retrieving the processor type from /proc/cpuinfo (but not
for Debian obviously), e.g.
Fedora:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/coreutils.git/tree/coreutils-8.2-uname-processortype.patch
Gentoo:
http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo/src/patchsets/coreutils/8.21/003_all_coreutils-gentoo-uname.patch?revision=1.1
openSUSE:
https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file/Base:System/coreutils/coreutils-sysinfo.patch?expand=1
Unfortunately we didn't come to a conclusion yet on how
to maintain this in upstream coreutils.
Have a nice day,
Berny
This bug report was last modified 9 years and 305 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.