From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 27 15:53:32 2013 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Oct 2013 19:53:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47737 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VaWOx-0002nh-QX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 15:53:32 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60172) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VaWOw-0002nR-GH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 15:53:30 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VaWOq-0008Fy-8w for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 15:53:25 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:34986) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VaWOq-0008Fu-5x for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 15:53:24 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33661) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VaWOp-00036K-6a for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 15:53:24 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VaWOn-0008Fh-Ut for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 15:53:23 -0400 Received: from mail-oa0-x22a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c02::22a]:36096) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VaWOn-0008Fd-QS for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 15:53:21 -0400 Received: by mail-oa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id k14so2809006oag.15 for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 12:53:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Rtn6+Tkd2+HkJOF//bK3XAIXnVwYnEl21R40o+suGXY=; b=nFrKgk+wtnVZZbmaPFKxI30+LTfloIraMqqeeitMLPLDzkDhqBItfsdJh4FMw14bZU nHlQ8f+riJZWc1x1A3U7x7rkio4MmJ/aahmksyrPeqzk4a1MoSKT8YUregN2Y5anQYhE 7ZpPODEzNLj9Q2c74PnAh+Qx7x88AOB/9OSoXZIjL+en0ZIBvuZc5lwyQ59Jugq5TX8P GPCFq5NsnpBYEm13JVZCrvKInxdXaPTduoUrjGHkul3doaDVtC8mPTtv77qdO/Xb7iB8 DtlX8trHsxppa/PpzXiaxMFGt8OB5/fLsK1D7wiVl8ws5JDfmKYe1w3LmQIsgmqwM44f v4Hg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.157.2 with SMTP id wi2mr9034756oeb.35.1382903600654; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 12:53:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.179.102 with HTTP; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 12:53:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 14:53:20 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Doesn't support clang as well as it could. From: Matt Sicker To: bug-guile@gnu.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e011830f4e0319604e9be55da X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) --089e011830f4e0319604e9be55da Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 There are plenty of macros that only check for GNU GCC and don't bother checking support from other popular compilers. For example, in libguile/__scm.h, the macros SCM_NORETURN, SCM_UNUSED, SCM_EXPECT, and many more, all only check for GCC support. Most (if not all) of these language extensions are supported by Clang, and usually using the same exact syntax! I'll submit a patch that adds Clang support to these macros. See < http://clang.llvm.org/docs/LanguageExtensions.html> for the documentation about this. -- Matt Sicker --089e011830f4e0319604e9be55da Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
There are plenty of macros that only check for GNU GCC and= don't bother checking support from other popular compilers. For exampl= e, in libguile/__scm.h, the macros SCM_NORETURN, SCM_UNUSED, SCM_EXPECT, an= d many more, all only check for GCC support. Most (if not all) of these lan= guage extensions are supported by Clang, and usually using the same exact s= yntax!

I'll submit a patch that adds Clang support to these mac= ros. See <http://clang.llvm.org/docs/LanguageExtensions.html> for the documen= tation about this.

--
Matt Sicker <boards@gmail.com>
--089e011830f4e0319604e9be55da-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Nov 01 17:48:31 2013 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Nov 2013 21:48:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58197 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VcMZz-0004Y8-8r for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 17:48:31 -0400 Received: from world.peace.net ([96.39.62.75]:60074 ident=hope2) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VcMZx-0004Y0-0f for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 17:48:29 -0400 Received: from turntable.mit.edu ([18.160.0.29] helo=yeeloong) by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1VcMZq-0000tL-LV; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 17:48:22 -0400 From: Mark H Weaver To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 17:46:51 -0400 Message-ID: <87txfvokvo.fsf@netris.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: merge 15739 15741 thanks [...] Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header 0.2 NO_SUBJECT Extra score for no subject X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: merge 15739 15741 thanks [...] Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header 0.2 NO_SUBJECT Extra score for no subject merge 15739 15741 thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Nov 01 18:02:03 2013 Received: (at 15739-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Nov 2013 22:02:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58213 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VcMn5-0005yK-HM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 18:02:03 -0400 Received: from world.peace.net ([96.39.62.75]:60078 ident=hope5) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VcMn3-0005xv-DE for 15739-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 18:02:01 -0400 Received: from turntable.mit.edu ([18.160.0.29] helo=yeeloong) by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1VcMmw-0000vb-By; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 18:01:54 -0400 From: Mark H Weaver To: Matt Sicker Subject: Re: bug#15739: Doesn't support clang as well as it could. References: Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 18:00:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Matt Sicker's message of "Sun, 27 Oct 2013 17:10:24 -0500") Message-ID: <87ob63ok94.fsf@netris.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 15739-done Cc: 15739-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) Hi Matt, Matt Sicker writes: > I noticed that clang reports to be GCC version 4.2, so most of what I > thought might be wrong wasn't. Therefore, the patch was far easier and > smaller than I expected. This isn't too high a priority, but it does > add support for clang where the code would normally check for GCC > 4.3+. Clang even supports C++ static_assert supposedly, so there's a > check for that as well. > > -- > Matt Sicker > > > From 2b02509f53a247784b4bb0be96061e46b53b0c4e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Matt Sicker > Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 16:54:06 -0500 > Subject: [PATCH] Updated a couple compiler checks to support clang. > > * lib/poll.c [__clang__]: Same functionality as GCC 4.3+ for ignoring > the (nfd < 0) tests. > * lib/verify.h [__has_feature(c_static_assert)]: Enables > _GL_HAVE__STATIC_ASSERT when clang feature is available for C. > * lib/verify.h [__has_feature(cxx_static_assert)]: Enables > * _GL_HAVE_STATIC_ASSERT when clang feature is available for C++. Both of these files are part of gnulib. As a matter of policy, we do not change those files in our repository. Instead we update from gnulib's repository from time to time. Can you please send this problem report and patch to ? I'm closing this bug, since there's nothing for us to do in Guile. If you find any clang-related problems in Guile itself, please let us know. Thanks, Mark From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Nov 28 14:35:47 2013 Received: (at 15739) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Nov 2013 19:35:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49149 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vm7NL-0000pK-0m for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 14:35:47 -0500 Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.83]:18898) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vm7NI-0000p6-EU for 15739@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 14:35:45 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,792,1378850400"; d="scan'208";a="45962988" Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr (HELO pluto) ([80.67.176.83]) by mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 28 Nov 2013 20:35:37 +0100 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: Matt Sicker Subject: Re: bug#15739: Doesn't support clang as well as it could. References: X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 8 Frimaire an 222 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 83C4 F8E5 10A3 3B4C 5BEA D15D 77DD 95E2 EA52 ECF4 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 20:35:37 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Matt Sicker's message of "Sun, 27 Oct 2013 14:53:20 -0500") Message-ID: <877gbs1fqu.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130007 (Ma Gnus v0.7) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 15739 Cc: 15739@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) Hi, Matt Sicker skribis: > There are plenty of macros that only check for GNU GCC and don't bother > checking support from other popular compilers. For example, in > libguile/__scm.h, the macros SCM_NORETURN, SCM_UNUSED, SCM_EXPECT, and ma= ny > more, all only check for GCC support. Most (if not all) of these language > extensions are supported by Clang, and usually using the same exact synta= x! Doesn=E2=80=99t Clang still define __GNUC__? If it does, then it has to be= have like GCC, and thus nothing Clang-specific needs to be added. Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Nov 30 20:31:05 2013 Received: (at 15739) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Dec 2013 01:31:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52251 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VmvsG-0005LY-Kj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 20:31:04 -0500 Received: from mail-ob0-f169.google.com ([209.85.214.169]:34556) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VmvsF-0005L1-34 for 15739@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 20:31:03 -0500 Received: by mail-ob0-f169.google.com with SMTP id wm4so11467756obc.28 for <15739@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 17:30:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=WZ9qsbhY4wvbOuPQSTN+fHYVPP7UaZnnkcroFXbJhd0=; b=g7R+k94XVKgN9UocI0F5Hz8lmK497MY4gy9jSPSXOZjSXddIzafdj14yNJuJP5zq9m rE5JH3/MO+pCBY+QS0H2dR0JA5Qar0d3h1LNL0P2ztXShZ7WWJSdEzV12W1LEMH+yBjy KDFvxIPi7IiHS9lmjsUz55GR5q3w1NLRpGwPb6CS9c8oYIWCs6iChrMabu01lVZzIkB7 RkE5HgYY5o45x6xkN+i19svHMVE+M4VysIXZQppeGYA0Q+ZWtAGKvqkO3nenLThEt4l2 ghZjiYVivY6LT28P0kWj+/p3Mo24JhDdUG/z2UqCqwY+zpgDJ9eGF6gz9fZ6qs36JZWB 9iWw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.70.134 with SMTP id m6mr48612717oeu.14.1385861457206; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 17:30:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.131.102 with HTTP; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 17:30:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <877gbs1fqu.fsf@gnu.org> References: <877gbs1fqu.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 19:30:57 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#15739: Doesn't support clang as well as it could. From: Matt Sicker To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1133458edd643704ec6f03bb X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 15739 Cc: 15739@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) --001a1133458edd643704ec6f03bb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 28 November 2013 13:35, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > > Doesn=E2=80=99t Clang still define __GNUC__? If it does, then it has to = behave > like GCC, and thus nothing Clang-specific needs to be added. > Yeah, turns out it's a different issue. --=20 Matt Sicker --001a1133458edd643704ec6f03bb Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 2= 8 November 2013 13:35, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> wrot= e:
Doesn=E2=80=99t Clang still define __GNUC__? =C2=A0If it does, then it has = to behave
like GCC, and thus nothing Clang-specific needs to be added.

Yeah, turns out it's a different= issue.

--=C2=A0
Matt Sicker <boards@gmail.com>
--001a1133458edd643704ec6f03bb-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Dec 01 17:09:30 2013 Received: (at 15739-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Dec 2013 22:09:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53607 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VnFCk-0007Cc-FR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 Dec 2013 17:09:30 -0500 Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.104]:30984) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VnFCh-0007CJ-Ox for 15739-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 Dec 2013 17:09:29 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,807,1378850400"; d="scan'208";a="38813179" Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr (HELO pluto) ([80.67.176.83]) by mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 01 Dec 2013 23:09:21 +0100 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: Matt Sicker Subject: Re: bug#15739: Doesn't support clang as well as it could. References: <877gbs1fqu.fsf@gnu.org> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 11 Frimaire an 222 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 83C4 F8E5 10A3 3B4C 5BEA D15D 77DD 95E2 EA52 ECF4 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2013 23:09:20 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Matt Sicker's message of "Sat, 30 Nov 2013 19:30:57 -0600") Message-ID: <874n6sql4f.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130007 (Ma Gnus v0.7) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 15739-done Cc: 15739-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) Matt Sicker skribis: > On 28 November 2013 13:35, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> >> Doesn=E2=80=99t Clang still define __GNUC__? If it does, then it has to= behave >> like GCC, and thus nothing Clang-specific needs to be added. >> > > Yeah, turns out it's a different issue. Thanks for letting us know. I=E2=80=99m closing the bug now. Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 10 16:30:02 2013 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Dec 2013 21:30:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42291 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VqUsS-0000vA-Un for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 16:30:01 -0500 Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.104]:53153) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VqUsQ-0000uy-GB for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 16:29:59 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,866,1378850400"; d="scan'208";a="40341814" Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr (HELO pluto) ([80.67.176.83]) by mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 10 Dec 2013 22:29:56 +0100 Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 22:29:56 +0100 Message-Id: <871u1kv1gr.fsf@gnu.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: control message for bug #15739 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) tags 15739 wontfix From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 10 17:01:39 2013 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Dec 2013 22:01:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42331 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VqVN5-0002td-3U for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 17:01:39 -0500 Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.104]:58519) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VqVN4-0002tV-7S for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 17:01:38 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,867,1378850400"; d="scan'208";a="40345142" Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr (HELO pluto) ([80.67.176.83]) by mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 10 Dec 2013 23:01:37 +0100 Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 23:01:36 +0100 Message-Id: <87iouwtlfj.fsf@gnu.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: control message for bug #15739 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) tags 15739 moreinfo From unknown Wed Jun 18 23:04:29 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 12:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator