GNU bug report logs - #15691
,br doesn't work for generic functions

Previous Next

Package: guile;

Reported by: Jordy Dickinson <jordy.dickinson <at> gmail.com>

Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 06:08:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Ian Price <ianprice90 <at> googlemail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Jordy Dickinson <jordy.dickinson <at> gmail.com>
Subject: bug#15691: closed (Re: bug#15691: ,br doesn't work for generic
 functions)
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 04:08:02 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report

#15691: ,br doesn't work for generic functions

which was filed against the guile package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 15691 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
15691: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=15691
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Ian Price <ianprice90 <at> googlemail.com>
To: Jordy Dickinson <jordy.dickinson <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 15691-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#15691: ,br doesn't work for generic functions
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 04:07:39 +0000
I pushed the patch from the 24 of October (commit
3981feaa11aa0d866ff1d99128f0ace3). It's not perfect,
but I'm marking this one done. Sorry it took a while.


-- 
Ian Price -- shift-reset.com

"Programming is like pinball. The reward for doing it well is
the opportunity to do it again" - from "The Wizardy Compiled"

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Jordy Dickinson <jordy.dickinson <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-guile <at> gnu.org
Subject: ,br doesn't work for generic functions
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 01:51:25 -0400
# What I did:

I used ,br with a generic function, specifically I entered ",br initialize".

# What I expected:

I wasn't sure what to expect, given that generic functions can have
many implementations, but since there was no error and a "generic"
object appeared in the output of ",traps", I expected at least that
when _some_ initialize method was called I would be put into a
debugging prompt.

# What actually happened:

When I called a function that called the initialize method ("make" in
this particular case), it completed successfully, without any debug
prompt.



This bug report was last modified 11 years and 137 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.