From unknown Tue Jun 24 05:07:03 2025 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Subject: bug#1567: Mailing an archived bug Reply-To: Glenn Morris , 1567@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Resent-To: bug-submit-list@lists.donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Don Armstrong Resent-Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 22:45:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 1567 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B.122920779021639 (code B ref -1); Sat, 13 Dec 2008 22:45:02 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 18; hammy, 45; neutral, 62; spammy, 2. spammytokens:0.993-1--rejection, 0.863-+--UD:com hammytokens:0.000-+--H*UA:Emacs, 0.000-+--H*r:140.186.70, 0.000-+--H*r:ip*140.186.70.10, 0.000-+--H*r:sk:fencepo, 0.000-+--H*MI:fencepost X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.8 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,UNRESOLVED_TEMPLATE autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 13 Dec 2008 22:36:30 +0000 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id mBDMaOgu021632 for ; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 14:36:25 -0800 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1LBd5L-0003aP-Me; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 17:35:43 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18756.14527.560664.617248@fencepost.gnu.org> Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 17:35:43 -0500 From: Glenn Morris To: submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Attribution: GM X-Mailer: VM (www.wonderworks.com/vm), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs) X-Hue: blue X-Ran: h'NDwl5<%LJ:P9ctTlUTjJrl2M"}#G*39a2=W{NB#;WUQ@9:SA2`E4FRFM(X~4LiIdhD$" Package: emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com By experiment, if I send mail to an archived bug, everything appears to work as normal. I get an acknowledgement mail thanking me for my information, and my mail is sent on to bug-gnu-emacs. However, the information is not added to the relevant bug in the database. This failure happens silently and without any notification. I think it would be better if the mail were not sent to bug-gnu-emacs; instead I should get a rejection mail, similar to the ones I get from the control server: Cannot find bug ### (is it archived?) From unknown Tue Jun 24 05:07:03 2025 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Subject: bug#1567: Mailing an archived bug Reply-To: Don Armstrong , 1567@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: Don Armstrong Resent-To: bug-submit-list@lists.donarmstrong.com Resent-Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 23:55:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 1567 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by 1567-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B1567.12292119609141 (code B ref 1567); Sat, 13 Dec 2008 23:55:04 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 10; hammy, 80; neutral, 46; spammy, 3. spammytokens:0.954-+--receiving, 0.930-2--brain, 0.863-+--UD:com hammytokens:0.000-+--HTo:U*rgm, 0.000-+--UD:donarmstrong.com, 0.000-+--H*UA:1.5.18, 0.000-+--H*UA:2008-05-17, 0.000-+--H*u:1.5.18 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.7 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: (at 1567) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 13 Dec 2008 23:46:00 +0000 Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id mBDNjxBM009137; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 15:45:59 -0800 Received: (from remotemail@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id mBDNjvDf009136; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 15:45:57 -0800 Received: (nullmailer pid 25195 invoked by uid 1000); Sat, 13 Dec 2008 23:45:44 -0000 Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 15:45:44 -0800 From: Don Armstrong To: Glenn Morris , 1567@debbugs.gnu.org Message-ID: <20081213234544.GS24493@volo.donarmstrong.com> Mail-Followup-To: Glenn Morris , 1567@debbugs.gnu.org References: <18756.14527.560664.617248@fencepost.gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <18756.14527.560664.617248@fencepost.gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) On Sat, 13 Dec 2008, Glenn Morris wrote: > By experiment, if I send mail to an archived bug, everything appears > to work as normal. I get an acknowledgement mail thanking me for my > information, and my mail is sent on to bug-gnu-emacs. However, the > information is not added to the relevant bug in the database. This > failure happens silently and without any notification. Which archived bug? You should be receiving a message like "Unknown problem report"... If you're seeing these, please send me the message you sent, the ack, and any other information that you think would be useful. Don Armstrong -- What I can't stand is the feeling that my brain is leaving me for someone more interesting. http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu From unknown Tue Jun 24 05:07:03 2025 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Subject: bug#1567: Mailing an archived bug Reply-To: Glenn Morris , 1567@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Resent-To: bug-submit-list@lists.donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Don Armstrong Resent-Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 06:30:52 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 1567 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by 1567-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B1567.122921408219505 (code B ref 1567); Wed, 17 Dec 2008 06:30:52 +0000 Received: (at 1567) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 14 Dec 2008 00:21:22 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER, X_DEBBUGS_NO_ACK autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id mBE0LJGJ019493 for <1567@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 16:21:20 -0800 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1LBeis-0007io-2w; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 19:20:38 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="2RYi5Znscj" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18756.20821.976740.284754@fencepost.gnu.org> Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 19:20:37 -0500 From: Glenn Morris To: Don Armstrong Cc: 1567@debbugs.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20081213234544.GS24493@volo.donarmstrong.com> References: <18756.14527.560664.617248@fencepost.gnu.org> <20081213234544.GS24493@volo.donarmstrong.com> X-Attribution: GM X-Mailer: VM (www.wonderworks.com/vm), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs) X-Hue: blue X-Ran: f%tWCVlxlNAPb*Tc$H;|2QTV(2n`=fL,5HS.ye*qCYfd&sw!S\nlI9ob0EWxV.l[WG#0g} --2RYi5Znscj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Description: message body text Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Don Armstrong wrote (on Sat, 13 Dec 2008 at 15:45 -0800): > Which archived bug? You should be receiving a message like "Unknown > problem report"... #1. > If you're seeing these, please send me the message you sent, the ack, > and any other information that you think would be useful. I sent this mail to 1@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com: --2RYi5Znscj Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Envelope-to: rgm@gnu.org Delivery-date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 16:44:02 -0500 Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:36176) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1LBcHK-0001iK-8z for rgm@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 16:44:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LBcHy-0002hN-4N for rgm@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 16:44:42 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on monty-python X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, BLANK_LINES_70_80,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no version=3.1.0 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:41748) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LBcHx-0002hJ-Vy for rgm@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 16:44:42 -0500 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47310 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LBcHx-000259-Te for rgm@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 16:44:41 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LBcHf-000214-0t for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 16:44:23 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LBcHd-00020a-81 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 16:44:22 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=59402 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LBcHd-00020V-4G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 16:44:21 -0500 Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:60325) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LBcHc-0002cT-HE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 16:44:20 -0500 Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id mBDLiIPm005713; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 13:44:19 -0800 Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id mBDLZ34U002986; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 13:35:03 -0800 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 1 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by 1-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B1.12292037491486 (code B ref 1); Sat, 13 Dec 2008 21:35:03 +0000 Received: (at 1) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 13 Dec 2008 21:29:09 +0000 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id mBDLT6gY001480 for <1@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 13:29:08 -0800 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1LBc2E-0000v7-1H for 1@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 16:28:26 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: <18756.10489.998028.700890@fencepost.gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+rgm=gnu.org@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 16:28:25 -0500 Resent-From: Glenn Morris Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 21:35:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com Resent-Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 16:44:22 -0500 From: Glenn Morris Reply-To: Glenn Morris , 1@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+rgm=gnu.org@gnu.org To: 1@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: Subject: bug#1: test of mailing an archived bug This is a test. What happens if I send mail to an archived bug? Debbugs-No-Ack not in use. --2RYi5Znscj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Description: message body text Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I got this ack: --2RYi5Znscj Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit CONTENT-TRANSFER-ENCODING: quoted-printable Return-path: Envelope-to: rgm@gnu.org Delivery-date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 16:43:41 -0500 Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:36153 helo=mx10.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1LBcGz-0001h3-Me for rgm@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 16:43:41 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LBcHc-0002cd-PM for rgm@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 16:44:21 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on monty-python X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:60321) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LBcHc-0002cR-CO for rgm@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 16:44:20 -0500 Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id mBDLiIPi005713 for ; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 13:44:18 -0800 Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id mBDLZ3N7002994; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 13:35:03 -0800 Content-Disposition: inline MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Message-ID: References: <18756.10489.998028.700890@fencepost.gnu.org> X-Emacs-PR-Message: ack-info 1 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 13:35:03 -0800 From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (Emacs bug Tracking System) Reply-To: 1@debbugs.gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Subject: bug#1: Info received (test of mailing an archived bug) X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.420 (Entity 5.420) Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): Emacs Bugs If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please send it to 1@debbugs.gnu.org, as before. Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@gnu.org unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. --=20 1: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D1 Emacs Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems --2RYi5Znscj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Description: message body text Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit It appeared on bug-gnu-emacs: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-emacs/2008-12/msg00469.html But not in the tracker: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=1 --2RYi5Znscj-- From unknown Tue Jun 24 05:07:03 2025 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Subject: bug#1567: Mailing an archived bug Reply-To: Don Armstrong , 1567@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: Don Armstrong Resent-To: bug-submit-list@lists.donarmstrong.com Resent-Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 06:31:06 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 1567 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by 1567-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B1567.122921495223547 (code B ref 1567); Wed, 17 Dec 2008 06:31:06 +0000 Received: (at 1567) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 14 Dec 2008 00:35:52 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id mBE0ZomW023541; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 16:35:50 -0800 Received: (from remotemail@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id mBE0ZoJ5023540; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 16:35:50 -0800 Received: (nullmailer pid 29698 invoked by uid 1000); Sun, 14 Dec 2008 00:35:38 -0000 Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 16:35:38 -0800 From: Don Armstrong To: Glenn Morris , 1567@debbugs.gnu.org Message-ID: <20081214003538.GV24493@volo.donarmstrong.com> Mail-Followup-To: Glenn Morris , 1567@debbugs.gnu.org References: <18756.14527.560664.617248@fencepost.gnu.org> <20081213234544.GS24493@volo.donarmstrong.com> <18756.20821.976740.284754@fencepost.gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <18756.20821.976740.284754@fencepost.gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) On Sat, 13 Dec 2008, Glenn Morris wrote: Content-Description: message body text > > Don Armstrong wrote (on Sat, 13 Dec 2008 at 15:45 -0800): > > > Which archived bug? You should be receiving a message like "Unknown > > problem report"... > > #1. > > > If you're seeing these, please send me the message you sent, the ack, > > and any other information that you think would be useful. > > I sent this mail to 1@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com: Hrm; can you try again? I recently updated to a newer version of debbugs on that machine, and whatever was going on there shouldn't happen. Don Armstrong -- Vimes hated and despised the privileges of rank, but they had this to be said for them: At least they meant that you could hate and despise them in comfort. -- Terry Pratchett _The Fifth Elephant_ p111 http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu From unknown Tue Jun 24 05:07:03 2025 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Subject: bug#1567: Mailing an archived bug Reply-To: Glenn Morris , 1567@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Resent-To: bug-submit-list@lists.donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Don Armstrong Resent-Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:45:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 1567 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by 1567-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B1567.122954253912957 (code B ref 1567); Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:45:02 +0000 Received: (at 1567) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 17 Dec 2008 19:35:39 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER, X_DEBBUGS_NO_ACK autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id mBHJZap3012951 for <1567@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Wed, 17 Dec 2008 11:35:37 -0800 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1LD2AU-00032D-L1; Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:34:50 -0500 From: Glenn Morris To: 1567@debbugs.gnu.org References: <18756.14527.560664.617248@fencepost.gnu.org> <20081213234544.GS24493@volo.donarmstrong.com> <18756.20821.976740.284754@fencepost.gnu.org> <20081214003538.GV24493@volo.donarmstrong.com> X-Spook: industrial espionage ASO World Trade Center Exon Shell X-Ran: '[g}voMrxeEsx (Don Armstrong's message of "Sat, 13 Dec 2008 16:35:38 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Don Armstrong wrote: > Hrm; can you try again? I recently updated to a newer version of > debbugs on that machine, and whatever was going on there shouldn't > happen. It's still the same. I sent another message to bug#1, got an "Info received" ack, my mail appeared on bug-gnu-emacs, but not on the tracker. From unknown Tue Jun 24 05:07:03 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.420 (Entity 5.420) X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (Emacs bug Tracking System) To: Glenn Morris Subject: bug#1567 closed by Don Armstrong (Re: bug#1567: Mailing an archived bug) Message-ID: References: <20081218091701.GR4782@volo.donarmstrong.com> <18756.14527.560664.617248@fencepost.gnu.org> X-Emacs-PR-Message: they-closed 1567 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Reply-To: 1567@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 09:25:04 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1229592304-573-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1229592304-573-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" This is an automatic notification regarding your bug report which was filed against the emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com package: #1567: Mailing an archived bug It has been closed by Don Armstrong . Their explanation is attached below along with your original report. If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate message then please contact Don Armstrong by replying to this email. --=20 1567: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D1567 Emacs Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1229592304-573-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 1567-done) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 18 Dec 2008 09:17:02 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id mBI9H2eu031754 for <1567-done@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 01:17:02 -0800 Received: (from remotemail@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id mBI9H2Qi031753 for 1567-done@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 01:17:02 -0800 Received: (nullmailer pid 5713 invoked by uid 1000); Thu, 18 Dec 2008 09:17:01 -0000 Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 01:17:01 -0800 From: Don Armstrong To: 1567-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#1567: Mailing an archived bug Message-ID: <20081218091701.GR4782@volo.donarmstrong.com> Mail-Followup-To: 1567-done@debbugs.gnu.org References: <18756.14527.560664.617248@fencepost.gnu.org> <20081213234544.GS24493@volo.donarmstrong.com> <18756.20821.976740.284754@fencepost.gnu.org> <20081214003538.GV24493@volo.donarmstrong.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, Glenn Morris wrote: > Don Armstrong wrote: > > > Hrm; can you try again? I recently updated to a newer version of > > debbugs on that machine, and whatever was going on there shouldn't > > happen. > > It's still the same. I sent another message to bug#1, got an "Info > received" ack, my mail appeared on bug-gnu-emacs, but not on the > tracker. Thanks; I've tested this now, and it should be working properly. Don Armstrong -- I never until now realized that the primary job of any emoticon is to say "excuse me, that didn't make any sense." ;-P -- Cory Doctorow http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu ------------=_1229592304-573-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >From rgm@gnu.org Sat Dec 13 14:36:30 2008 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 18; hammy, 45; neutral, 62; spammy, 2. spammytokens:0.993-1--rejection, 0.863-+--UD:com hammytokens:0.000-+--H*UA:Emacs, 0.000-+--H*r:140.186.70, 0.000-+--H*r:ip*140.186.70.10, 0.000-+--H*r:sk:fencepo, 0.000-+--H*MI:fencepost X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.8 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,UNRESOLVED_TEMPLATE autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 13 Dec 2008 22:36:30 +0000 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id mBDMaOgu021632 for ; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 14:36:25 -0800 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1LBd5L-0003aP-Me; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 17:35:43 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18756.14527.560664.617248@fencepost.gnu.org> Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 17:35:43 -0500 From: Glenn Morris To: submit@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Mailing an archived bug X-Attribution: GM X-Mailer: VM (www.wonderworks.com/vm), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs) X-Hue: blue X-Ran: h'NDwl5<%LJ:P9ctTlUTjJrl2M"}#G*39a2=W{NB#;WUQ@9:SA2`E4FRFM(X~4LiIdhD$" Package: emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com By experiment, if I send mail to an archived bug, everything appears to work as normal. I get an acknowledgement mail thanking me for my information, and my mail is sent on to bug-gnu-emacs. However, the information is not added to the relevant bug in the database. This failure happens silently and without any notification. I think it would be better if the mail were not sent to bug-gnu-emacs; instead I should get a rejection mail, similar to the ones I get from the control server: Cannot find bug ### (is it archived?) ------------=_1229592304-573-1-- From unknown Tue Jun 24 05:07:03 2025 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Subject: bug#1567: Mailing an archived bug Reply-To: Glenn Morris , 1567@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Resent-To: bug-submit-list@lists.donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Don Armstrong Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 20:35:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 1567 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by 1567-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B1567.12296322433751 (code B ref 1567); Thu, 18 Dec 2008 20:35:02 +0000 Received: (at 1567) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 18 Dec 2008 20:30:43 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER, X_DEBBUGS_NO_ACK autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id mBIKUdCX003743 for <1567@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 12:30:41 -0800 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1LDPVI-00038G-GB for 1567@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:29:52 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18762.45760.449590.228790@fencepost.gnu.org> Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:29:52 -0500 From: Glenn Morris To: 1567@debbugs.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20081218091701.GR4782@volo.donarmstrong.com> References: <18756.14527.560664.617248@fencepost.gnu.org> <20081213234544.GS24493@volo.donarmstrong.com> <18756.20821.976740.284754@fencepost.gnu.org> <20081214003538.GV24493@volo.donarmstrong.com> <20081218091701.GR4782@volo.donarmstrong.com> X-Attribution: GM X-Mailer: VM (www.wonderworks.com/vm), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs) X-Hue: white X-Ran: &JM`QAWbcH:g#1W/(jT(Q.OsxhRWpxo&aM;={u;^)Gx0e32M)*O1pwrA}Vfao$-tLXEHqC Don Armstrong wrote (on Thu, 18 Dec 2008 at 01:17 -0800): > Thanks; I've tested this now, and it should be working properly. Yes, thanks, but it could be more helpful. The reply I got merely said: From: don at donarmstrong.com (Emacs bug Tracking System) To: Glenn Morris Subject: Unknown problem report bug#3 (test) -- -1: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=-1 Emacs Bug Tracking System Contact don@donarmstrong.com with problems The body could say something helpful like: Bug#3 not found. Perhaps you mistyped, or this bug has been archived? The link in the signature is also unhelpful, since it seems that bug -NNN just resolves to bug +NNN. From unknown Tue Jun 24 05:07:03 2025 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Subject: bug#1567: Mailing an archived bug Reply-To: Don Armstrong , 1567@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: Don Armstrong Resent-To: bug-submit-list@lists.donarmstrong.com Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 22:40:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 1567 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by 1567-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B1567.122963979113796 (code B ref 1567); Thu, 18 Dec 2008 22:40:04 +0000 Received: (at 1567) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 18 Dec 2008 22:36:31 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=4.0 tests=FOURLA,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id mBIMaTRO013791; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:36:29 -0800 Received: (from remotemail@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id mBIMaTjU013790; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:36:29 -0800 Received: (nullmailer pid 28102 invoked by uid 1000); Thu, 18 Dec 2008 22:36:28 -0000 Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:36:28 -0800 From: Don Armstrong To: Glenn Morris , 1567@debbugs.gnu.org Message-ID: <20081218223628.GS4782@volo.donarmstrong.com> Mail-Followup-To: Glenn Morris , 1567@debbugs.gnu.org References: <18756.14527.560664.617248@fencepost.gnu.org> <20081213234544.GS24493@volo.donarmstrong.com> <18756.20821.976740.284754@fencepost.gnu.org> <20081214003538.GV24493@volo.donarmstrong.com> <20081218091701.GR4782@volo.donarmstrong.com> <18762.45760.449590.228790@fencepost.gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <18762.45760.449590.228790@fencepost.gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) On Thu, 18 Dec 2008, Glenn Morris wrote: > Don Armstrong wrote (on Thu, 18 Dec 2008 at 01:17 -0800): > > > Thanks; I've tested this now, and it should be working properly. > > Yes, thanks, but it could be more helpful. The reply I got merely said: Yeah, there's some problem with what it's supposed to send in the body; I have to go in and fix that. [Actually, I need to fix it to simply 500 these messages at RCPT TO: time, but I haven't gotten there yet.] Don Armstrong -- All bad precedents began as justifiable measures. -- Gaius Julius Caesar in "The Conspiracy of Catiline" by Sallust http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Dec 17 12:22:29 2009 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Dec 2009 17:22:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NLK3Y-0006um-EL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:22:28 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NLK3X-0006uX-7I for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:22:27 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NLK3S-0002LA-Ed; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:22:22 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <19242.26830.317927.267307@fencepost.gnu.org> Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:22:22 -0500 From: Glenn Morris To: control Subject: control X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org reassign 936 debbugs.gnu.org reassign 3060 debbugs.gnu.org reassign 3140 debbugs.gnu.org reassign 252 debbugs.gnu.org reassign 335 debbugs.gnu.org reassign 749 debbugs.gnu.org reassign 750 debbugs.gnu.org reassign 922 debbugs.gnu.org reassign 1780 debbugs.gnu.org reassign 1826 debbugs.gnu.org reassign 2472 debbugs.gnu.org reassign 3267 debbugs.gnu.org reassign 430 debbugs.gnu.org reassign 860 debbugs.gnu.org reassign 1030 debbugs.gnu.org reassign 2091 debbugs.gnu.org reassign 2645 debbugs.gnu.org unarchive 388 unarchive 389 unarchive 1567 unarchive 1568 unarchive 1886 reassign 388 debbugs.gnu.org reassign 389 debbugs.gnu.org reassign 1567 debbugs.gnu.org reassign 1568 debbugs.gnu.org reassign 1886 debbugs.gnu.org archive 388 archive 389 archive 1567 archive 1568 archive 1886