From unknown Tue Jun 24 19:10:36 2025 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Subject: bug#1566: 23.0.60; bug #1352 was closed before the last input Reply-To: "Drew Adams" , 1566@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: "Drew Adams" Resent-To: bug-submit-list@lists.donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 22:35:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 1566 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B.122920741619680 (code B ref -1); Sat, 13 Dec 2008 22:35:03 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 17; hammy, 92; neutral, 70; spammy, 1. spammytokens:0.878-6--room hammytokens:0.000-+--emacs, 0.000-+--23.0.60, 0.000-+--23060, 0.000-+--Emacs, 0.000-+--gnu X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.2 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 13 Dec 2008 22:30:16 +0000 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id mBDMUCH0019601 for ; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 14:30:13 -0800 Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:37676) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1LBczL-0003Sv-F6 for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 17:29:31 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LBczz-00071y-CJ for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 17:30:11 -0500 Received: from rcsinet12.oracle.com ([148.87.113.124]:26256 helo=rgminet12.oracle.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LBczy-00071m-Uv for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 17:30:11 -0500 Received: from acsinet13.oracle.com (acsinet13.oracle.com [141.146.126.235]) by rgminet12.oracle.com (Switch-3.3.1/Switch-3.3.1) with ESMTP id mBDMTri0024037 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 22:29:54 GMT Received: from acsmt704.oracle.com (acsmt704.oracle.com [141.146.40.82]) by acsinet13.oracle.com (Switch-3.3.1/Switch-3.3.1) with ESMTP id mBDMUUnP015756 for ; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 22:30:31 GMT Received: from dradamslap1 (/141.144.80.117) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 14:30:04 -0800 From: "Drew Adams" To: Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 14:30:12 -0800 Message-ID: <007701c95d72$5d1c4b00$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: AcldclyzQx3VDID9QTGVag0bgCpIAA== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350 X-Source-IP: acsmt704.oracle.com [141.146.40.82] X-Auth-Type: Internal IP X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090203.4944376E.0001:SCFSTAT928724,ss=1,fgs=0 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) I believe that the last input I sent to bug #1352 was received just after the bug got closed. IOW, the naming fix made did not benefit from that input. Please take the suggestions in that message into consideration. I filed the bug, and I still think there's room for improvement. In GNU Emacs 23.0.60.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600) of 2008-11-24 on LENNART-69DE564 Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600 configured using `configure --with-gcc (3.4) --no-opt --cflags -Ic:/g/include -fno-crossjumping' From unknown Tue Jun 24 19:10:36 2025 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Subject: bug#1566: 23.0.60; bug #1352 was closed before the last input Reply-To: Glenn Morris , 1566@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Resent-To: bug-submit-list@lists.donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 23:00:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 1566 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by 1566-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B1566.122920865525713 (code B ref 1566); Sat, 13 Dec 2008 23:00:03 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 17; hammy, 53; neutral, 52; spammy, 0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--23060, 0.000-+--23.0.60, 0.000-+--H*UA:Emacs, 0.000-+--H*r:140.186.70, 0.000-+--H*r:ip*140.186.70.10 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.9 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: (at 1566) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 13 Dec 2008 22:50:55 +0000 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id mBDMoltw025704; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 14:50:48 -0800 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1LBdJG-0003zJ-AJ; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 17:50:06 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18756.15390.253802.939848@fencepost.gnu.org> Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 17:50:06 -0500 From: Glenn Morris To: 1566@debbugs.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <007701c95d72$5d1c4b00$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> References: <007701c95d72$5d1c4b00$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> X-Attribution: GM X-Mailer: VM (www.wonderworks.com/vm), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs) X-Hue: green X-Ran: YeAVy3cwc2SD&")R1\^r((W9@1JX6J|!5_pKYdSLHf2Cxfi%Dq8/p#p8,.=e?-4)ul8!nN merge 1566 1352 stop Drew Adams wrote (on Sat, 13 Dec 2008 at 14:30 -0800): > I believe that the last input I sent to bug #1352 was received just > after the bug got closed. IOW, the naming fix made did not benefit > from that input. Information sent after a bug is closed still gets added to the bug report. Only after 28 days of no activity, the bug is archived. At that point, you cannot directly add more information to it. Your input was received. From unknown Tue Jun 24 19:10:36 2025 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Subject: bug#1566: 23.0.60; bug #1352 was closed before the last input Reply-To: "Drew Adams" , 1566@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: "Drew Adams" Resent-To: bug-submit-list@lists.donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 23:15:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 1566 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by 1566-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B1566.122920971330811 (code B ref 1566); Sat, 13 Dec 2008 23:15:03 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 13; hammy, 70; neutral, 58; spammy, 2. spammytokens:0.944-+--his, 0.887-+--came hammytokens:0.000-+--23.0.60, 0.000-+--23060, 0.000-+--H*M:oracle, 0.000-+--H*F:U*drew.adams, 0.000-+--H*r:dradamslap1 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.7 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: (at 1566) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 13 Dec 2008 23:08:33 +0000 Received: from acsinet11.oracle.com (acsinet11.oracle.com [141.146.126.233]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id mBDN8UcL030800 for <1566@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 15:08:31 -0800 Received: from rgminet15.oracle.com (rcsinet15.oracle.com [148.87.113.117]) by acsinet11.oracle.com (Switch-3.3.1/Switch-3.3.1) with ESMTP id mBDN9Qoq028538 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 13 Dec 2008 23:09:28 GMT Received: from acsmt702.oracle.com (acsmt702.oracle.com [141.146.40.80]) by rgminet15.oracle.com (Switch-3.3.1/Switch-3.3.1) with ESMTP id mBDN8Tbc014369; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 23:08:30 GMT Received: from dradamslap1 (/141.144.80.117) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 15:08:19 -0800 From: "Drew Adams" To: "'Glenn Morris'" , <1566@debbugs.gnu.org> References: <007701c95d72$5d1c4b00$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> <18756.15390.253802.939848@fencepost.gnu.org> Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 15:08:27 -0800 Message-ID: <007d01c95d77$b5535ac0$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <18756.15390.253802.939848@fencepost.gnu.org> Thread-Index: Aclddz85tF+C2pg3S2mOmxHV/+YWBgAAC0jg X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350 X-Source-IP: acsmt702.oracle.com [141.146.40.80] X-Auth-Type: Internal IP X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A09020B.49444065.019C:SCFSTAT928724,ss=1,fgs=0 > > I believe that the last input I sent to bug #1352 was received just > > after the bug got closed. IOW, the naming fix made did not benefit > > from that input. > > Information sent after a bug is closed still gets added to > the bug report. > Only after 28 days of no activity, the bug is archived. At that point, > you cannot directly add more information to it. > > Your input was received. I know that it was received - I can see that in the bug list. My impression is that Juri made his fix and closed the bug before it was received. I think he did not have the benefit of that input. I'm asking that the additional input be considered, even though the bug was closed before it came in. From unknown Tue Jun 24 19:10:36 2025 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Subject: bug#1566: 23.0.60; bug #1352 was closed before the last input Reply-To: Glenn Morris , 1566@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Resent-To: bug-submit-list@lists.donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 23:18:06 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 1566 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by 1566-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B1566.122920988732156 (code B ref 1566); Sat, 13 Dec 2008 23:18:06 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 15; hammy, 59; neutral, 51; spammy, 2. spammytokens:0.944-+--his, 0.884-+--came hammytokens:0.000-+--23060, 0.000-+--23.0.60, 0.000-+--H*UA:Emacs, 0.000-+--H*r:140.186.70, 0.000-+--H*r:ip*140.186.70.10 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.4 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,X_DEBBUGS_NO_ACK autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: (at 1566) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 13 Dec 2008 23:11:27 +0000 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id mBDNBOw6032150 for <1566@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 15:11:25 -0800 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1LBddD-00054X-NT; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 18:10:43 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18756.16627.667268.798010@fencepost.gnu.org> Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 18:10:43 -0500 From: Glenn Morris To: 1566@debbugs.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <007d01c95d77$b5535ac0$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> References: <007701c95d72$5d1c4b00$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> <18756.15390.253802.939848@fencepost.gnu.org> <007d01c95d77$b5535ac0$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> X-Attribution: GM X-Mailer: VM (www.wonderworks.com/vm), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs) X-Hue: red X-Ran: 7L@2e,YID6<.ZTq^9(;\:Et'%\jn>;):'zZB@iUN-zu=-ESW"y+Q%_+5:/yE&>J2H(J|s) Drew Adams wrote (on Sat, 13 Dec 2008 at 15:08 -0800): > I know that it was received - I can see that in the bug list. My > impression is that Juri made his fix and closed the bug before it > was received. I think he did not have the benefit of that input. I'm > asking that the additional input be considered, even though the bug > was closed before it came in. I'm sure your input was given the attention it deserves. From unknown Tue Jun 24 19:10:36 2025 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Subject: bug#1566: 23.0.60; bug #1352 was closed before the last input Reply-To: "Drew Adams" , 1566@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: "Drew Adams" Resent-To: bug-submit-list@lists.donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 23:50:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 1566 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by 1566-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B1566.12292117637877 (code B ref 1566); Sat, 13 Dec 2008 23:50:03 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 8; hammy, 65; neutral, 57; spammy, 2. spammytokens:0.943-+--his, 0.881-+--came hammytokens:0.000-+--23060, 0.000-+--23.0.60, 0.000-+--H*M:oracle, 0.000-+--H*F:U*drew.adams, 0.000-+--H*r:dradamslap1 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.7 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: (at 1566) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 13 Dec 2008 23:42:43 +0000 Received: from rgminet13.oracle.com (rcsinet13.oracle.com [148.87.113.125]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id mBDNge5t007869 for <1566@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 15:42:41 -0800 Received: from rgminet15.oracle.com (rcsinet15.oracle.com [148.87.113.117]) by rgminet13.oracle.com (Switch-3.3.1/Switch-3.3.1) with ESMTP id mBDNh2aF011959 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 13 Dec 2008 23:43:03 GMT Received: from acsmt700.oracle.com (acsmt700.oracle.com [141.146.40.70]) by rgminet15.oracle.com (Switch-3.3.1/Switch-3.3.1) with ESMTP id mBDNgdCD013658; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 23:42:41 GMT Received: from dradamslap1 (/141.144.80.117) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 15:42:30 -0800 From: "Drew Adams" To: "'Glenn Morris'" , <1566@debbugs.gnu.org> References: <007701c95d72$5d1c4b00$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com><18756.15390.253802.939848@fencepost.gnu.org><007d01c95d77$b5535ac0$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> <18756.16627.667268.798010@fencepost.gnu.org> Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 15:42:38 -0800 Message-ID: <007f01c95d7c$7bf743e0$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <18756.16627.667268.798010@fencepost.gnu.org> Thread-Index: AcldeiQcHW21gYcnTouHtyGUxbBQ6AAAj3Sw X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350 X-Source-IP: acsmt700.oracle.com [141.146.40.70] X-Auth-Type: Internal IP X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090202.49444868.006A:SCFSTAT928724,ss=1,fgs=0 > > I know that it was received - I can see that in the bug list. My > > impression is that Juri made his fix and closed the bug before it > > was received. I think he did not have the benefit of that input. I'm > > asking that the additional input be considered, even though the bug > > was closed before it came in. > > I'm sure your input was given the attention it deserves. Clever. ;-) You're sure, but I'm not. Now Juri is at least aware of the input. From unknown Tue Jun 24 19:10:36 2025 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Subject: bug#1566: 23.0.60; bug #1352 was closed before the last input Reply-To: Juri Linkov , 1566@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: Juri Linkov Resent-To: bug-submit-list@lists.donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 01:10:05 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 1566 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by 1566-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B1566.1229648797602 (code B ref 1566); Fri, 19 Dec 2008 01:10:05 +0000 Received: (at 1566) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 19 Dec 2008 01:06:37 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from relay03.kiev.sovam.com (relay03.kiev.sovam.com [62.64.120.201]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id mBJ16XUM000593 for <1566@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 17:06:35 -0800 Received: from [83.170.232.243] (helo=smtp.svitonline.com) by relay03.kiev.sovam.com with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1LDTp1-000PRb-P3; Fri, 19 Dec 2008 03:06:32 +0200 From: Juri Linkov To: Drew Adams Cc: 1566@debbugs.gnu.org Organization: JURTA References: <007701c95d72$5d1c4b00$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> <18756.15390.253802.939848@fencepost.gnu.org> <007d01c95d77$b5535ac0$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> <18756.16627.667268.798010@fencepost.gnu.org> <007f01c95d7c$7bf743e0$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 02:45:45 +0200 In-Reply-To: <007f01c95d7c$7bf743e0$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> (Drew Adams's message of "Sat, 13 Dec 2008 15:42:38 -0800") Message-ID: <8763lhgel3.fsf@jurta.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Scanner-Signature: c2436a487120708c9e0f2b31fdd4cc45 X-DrWeb-checked: yes X-SpamTest-Envelope-From: juri@jurta.org X-SpamTest-Group-ID: 00000000 X-SpamTest-Header: Trusted X-SpamTest-Info: Profiles 6348 [Dec 19 2008] X-SpamTest-Info: {received from trusted relay: common white list} X-SpamTest-Info: {HEADERS: header Content-Type found without required header Content-Transfer-Encoding} X-SpamTest-Method: white ip list X-SpamTest-Rate: 10 X-SpamTest-Status: Trusted X-SpamTest-Status-Extended: trusted X-SpamTest-Version: SMTP-Filter Version 3.0.0 [0278], KAS30/Release >> > I know that it was received - I can see that in the bug list. My >> > impression is that Juri made his fix and closed the bug before it >> > was received. I think he did not have the benefit of that input. I'm >> > asking that the additional input be considered, even though the bug >> > was closed before it came in. >> >> I'm sure your input was given the attention it deserves. > > Clever. ;-) > > You're sure, but I'm not. > Now Juri is at least aware of the input. I don't know is it possible to reply to #1352. There is some spam at the end of http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=1352 -- Juri Linkov http://www.jurta.org/emacs/ From unknown Tue Jun 24 19:10:36 2025 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Subject: bug#1566: 23.0.60; bug #1352 was closed before the last input Reply-To: "Drew Adams" , 1566@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: "Drew Adams" Resent-To: bug-submit-list@lists.donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 09:20:05 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 1566 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by 1566-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B1566.1229678094890 (code B ref 1566); Fri, 19 Dec 2008 09:20:05 +0000 Received: (at 1566) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 19 Dec 2008 09:14:54 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from rgminet12.oracle.com (rcsinet12.oracle.com [148.87.113.124]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id mBJ6F4xG030851 for <1566@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 22:15:05 -0800 Received: from acsinet13.oracle.com (acsinet13.oracle.com [141.146.126.235]) by rgminet12.oracle.com (Switch-3.3.1/Switch-3.3.1) with ESMTP id mBJ6Ef6e012312 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 19 Dec 2008 06:14:42 GMT Received: from acsmt702.oracle.com (acsmt702.oracle.com [141.146.40.80]) by acsinet13.oracle.com (Switch-3.3.1/Switch-3.3.1) with ESMTP id mBJ6FLG4008936; Fri, 19 Dec 2008 06:15:23 GMT Received: from dradamslap1 (/24.5.135.148) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Fri, 19 Dec 2008 06:14:53 +0000 From: "Drew Adams" To: "'Juri Linkov'" Cc: <1566@debbugs.gnu.org> References: <007701c95d72$5d1c4b00$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com><18756.15390.253802.939848@fencepost.gnu.org><007d01c95d77$b5535ac0$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com><18756.16627.667268.798010@fencepost.gnu.org><007f01c95d7c$7bf743e0$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> <8763lhgel3.fsf@jurta.org> Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 22:14:52 -0800 Message-ID: <000801c961a1$1b1994a0$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <8763lhgel3.fsf@jurta.org> Thread-Index: AclhdiynZzDGsGTlTxuAksHL+v4QRwAKkcPg X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350 X-Source-IP: acsmt702.oracle.com [141.146.40.80] X-Auth-Type: Internal IP X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090206.494B3BDF.0055:SCFSTAT928724,ss=1,fgs=0 Hi Juri, > >> > I know that it was received - I can see that in the bug list. My > >> > impression is that Juri made his fix and closed the bug before it > >> > was received. I think he did not have the benefit of > >> > that input. I'm asking that the additional input be considered, > >> > even though the bug was closed before it came in. > >> > >> I'm sure your input was given the attention it deserves. > > > > Clever. ;-) > > > > You're sure, but I'm not. > > Now Juri is at least aware of the input. > > I don't know is it possible to reply to #1352. There is some spam at > the end of > http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=1352 Hm; so there is - dunno what that's about. Anyway, the input I was hoping you'd take a look at and think about is in the bug report, as Message #50: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=1352#50 No need to reply, unless you have a question about what I meant. Do whatever you think is best. Thx - Drew