From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Oct 19 06:29:29 2013 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Oct 2013 10:29:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57637 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VXTmi-0005Vo-Vj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 06:29:29 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45637) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VXTmg-0005VT-87 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 06:29:27 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VXTmU-0008Oe-3c for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 06:29:20 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:48211) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VXTmT-0008OR-Vw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 06:29:14 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47337) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VXTmM-0006zG-Rd for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 06:29:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VXTmG-00087n-7b for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 06:29:06 -0400 Received: from caiajhbdcbef.dreamhost.com ([208.97.132.145]:37135 helo=homiemail-a6.g.dreamhost.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VXTmF-00085I-V4 for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 06:29:00 -0400 Received: from homiemail-a6.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a6.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AE3559806C for ; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 03:28:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=jidanni.org; h=from:to :subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding; s=jidanni.org; bh=t/43dnBPlOmp5BRAs4c YVKUs5Kw=; b=BAkfCRBrs6FbAUaexD/6xOi49f3O5DjrFQJc8a+QgUqAyKhKJUB QolCDNaND7jKRoUq3j7OQCsSrjMJ2fDamx2k/s8Lyjek/CyyLUY1oiJq1Vb9Hgi9 RVwdqREh7NEomtUkxlExlkG8+q/5dQCmNzv8eES5lJqdsaUBNjvArj/g= Received: from jidanni.org (111-246-102-200.dynamic.hinet.net [111.246.102.200]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jidanni@jidanni.org) by homiemail-a6.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0CBAB59806B for ; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 03:28:58 -0700 (PDT) From: jidanni@jidanni.org To: bug-coreutils@gnu.org Subject: "cp: warning: source file =?utf-8?B?4oCYZuKAmQ==?= specified more than once" said more than once too! Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 18:28:55 +0800 Message-ID: <87ppr1imfs.fsf@jidanni.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) $ touch f $ mkdir w $ cp f f f w cp: warning: source file =E2=80=98f=E2=80=99 specified more than once cp: warning: source file =E2=80=98f=E2=80=99 specified more than once Hey, you yourself say that more than once itself! So either say cp: warning: source file =E2=80=98f=E2=80=99 specified more than once just once, or say cp: warning: source file =E2=80=98f=E2=80=99 specified again n-1 times. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Oct 30 06:54:13 2013 Received: (at 15650-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Oct 2013 10:54:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52233 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VbTPg-0003OM-9z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 06:54:12 -0400 Received: from mail1.vodafone.ie ([213.233.128.43]:52327) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VbTPZ-0003NX-VG; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 06:54:09 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ap4BAC7kcFJda9/8/2dsb2JhbAANTIZXT7w6gTqDGQEBAQQMFw8BRhAJAg0LAgIFFgsCAgkDAgECAToLEwEFAgEBiAiMK5podpJUgSmOJgcWglSBQgOebo0NgT4 Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.1.79]) ([93.107.223.252]) by mail1.vodafone.ie with ESMTP; 30 Oct 2013 10:53:58 +0000 Message-ID: <5270E546.6090801@draigBrady.com> Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 10:53:58 +0000 From: =?UTF-8?B?UMOhZHJhaWcgQnJhZHk=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jidanni@jidanni.org Subject: Re: bug#15650: "cp: warning: source file =?UTF-8?B?4oCYZuKAmSBzcA==?= =?UTF-8?B?ZWNpZmllZCBtb3JlIHRoYW4gb25jZSIgc2FpZCBtb3JlIHRoYW4gb25jZSB0b28=?= =?UTF-8?B?IQ==?= References: <87ppr1imfs.fsf@jidanni.org> In-Reply-To: <87ppr1imfs.fsf@jidanni.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 15650-done Cc: 15650-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) tag 15659 wontfix stop On 10/19/2013 11:28 AM, jidanni@jidanni.org wrote: > $ touch f > $ mkdir w > $ cp f f f w > cp: warning: source file ‘f’ specified more than once > cp: warning: source file ‘f’ specified more than once > > Hey, you yourself say that more than once itself! > > So either say > cp: warning: source file ‘f’ specified more than once > just once, or say > cp: warning: source file ‘f’ specified again > n-1 times. So we record this about each arg: struct F_triple { char *name; ino_t st_ino; dev_t st_dev; }; I suppose we could add a 'count' member, and a corresponding seen_file_count() function. Though I don't think the complication/clarification is warranted in this case. thanks, Pádraig. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Oct 30 10:47:04 2013 Received: (at 15650) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Oct 2013 14:47:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52804 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VbX31-0003Ky-QI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 10:47:04 -0400 Received: from mail-pd0-f181.google.com ([209.85.192.181]:63033) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VbX2y-0003KS-Gh for 15650@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 10:47:01 -0400 Received: by mail-pd0-f181.google.com with SMTP id x10so1055843pdj.26 for <15650@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 07:46:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=WQCQI2tMznZDAxXPD9mFrwqcfk/jrtPm7UdEKYf1y4I=; b=IB+q6tvINMK66hRV9k6/PJYs7iILrwmO6I6sjE4TQSsFkIhWa4AIGDKftfPCuU4BSa XTW4SQXHVlK2LTMQ/xsvbcHOwSK0TWisp56YkbPcVpQn+BNGcVbEmqoLj7bA+qEGlMY7 QnctygRXMvJO44eXASFKdGdqSELHDPan/jw/dubdRPMR0+10ghvo+ZRBUHmX5knr5jyw u4XSfjDlwUHepeZoeRv3Un5M7P0KoZhW4SiieFXFWcfze0ekBtlhONCmwQ1Cxdkg26Jv PY8t7XtQPcG/7kMEJaEdAop54Xq27djXePDcrhMRd8EfwMm8VKz15Ip7ckE/FmTrdZuF pqUA== X-Received: by 10.68.134.6 with SMTP id pg6mr5394136pbb.67.1383142866090; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 07:21:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.6.66 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 07:20:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5270E546.6090801@draigBrady.com> References: <87ppr1imfs.fsf@jidanni.org> <5270E546.6090801@draigBrady.com> From: Jim Meyering Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 07:20:45 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: -yNI-7PIhCO0QGZ3swdNJC8U65I Message-ID: Subject: =?windows-1252?Q?Re=3A_bug=2315650=3A_=22cp=3A_warning=3A_source_file_=91f=92_spe?= =?windows-1252?Q?cified_more_than_once=22_said_more_than_once_too=21?= To: 15650@debbugs.gnu.org, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?P=E1draig_Brady?= , Dan Jacobson Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 15650 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 3:53 AM, P=E1draig Brady wrote: > Though I don't think the complication/clarification > is warranted in this case. Glad we agree. THanks for replying. From unknown Sat Aug 16 18:48:29 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 12:24:03 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator