GNU bug report logs - #15620
guile 2.0.9 make check error, in bit-operations.test, elisp-compiler.test and eval-string.test

Previous Next

Package: guile;

Reported by: "" <everfast <at> 126.com>

Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 14:49:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: moreinfo

Done: Andy Wingo <wingo <at> pobox.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 15620 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 15620 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-guile <at> gnu.org:
bug#15620; Package guile. (Tue, 15 Oct 2013 14:49:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to "" <everfast <at> 126.com>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guile <at> gnu.org. (Tue, 15 Oct 2013 14:49:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: "" <everfast <at> 126.com>
To: bug-guile <bug-guile <at> gnu.org>, 
	guile-user <guile-user <at> gnu.org>
Subject: guile 2.0.9 make check error, in bit-operations.test,
 elisp-compiler.test and eval-string.test
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 17:05:05 +0800
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi, dear all.

When I am compiling guile 2.0.9 with Intel c compiler (icc, version 13.1.0 20130121), some errors occur. But I could not
figure it out. Could anybody help me?

The compiling is invoked by a script (install-guile_2.0.9.sh, attached) as below:
    bash-4.1$ sh install-guile_2.0.9.sh >install.output 2>&1 
Its output, install.output, and other two logs are also attached.

The first error emerges at line 1802 in install.output, which reads:
ERROR: bit-operations.test: bit-extract: documented? - arguments: ((keyword-argument-error #<procedure open-input-file (file #:key binary encoding guess-encoding)> "Invalid keyword" () #f)) 

There are 4 UNRESOLVED messages about elisp-compiler.test, and 3 errors about eval-string.test.

Could anyone help? Thanks.

Frank 
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
[install-guile_2.0.9.sh (application/octet-stream, attachment)]
[install.output (application/octet-stream, attachment)]
[config.log (application/octet-stream, attachment)]
[check-guile.log (application/octet-stream, attachment)]

Information forwarded to bug-guile <at> gnu.org:
bug#15620; Package guile. (Sun, 20 Oct 2013 21:06:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ian Price <ianprice90 <at> googlemail.com>
To: "" <everfast <at> 126.com>
Cc: bug-guile <bug-guile <at> gnu.org>, guile-user <guile-user <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Re: guile 2.0.9 make check error, in bit-operations.test,
 elisp-compiler.test and eval-string.test
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 22:05:19 +0100
<everfast <at> 126.com> writes:

> The first error emerges at line 1802 in install.output, which reads:
> ERROR: bit-operations.test: bit-extract: documented? - arguments: (
> (keyword-argument-error #<procedure open-input-file 
> (file #:key binary encoding guess-encoding)> "Invalid keyword" () #f)) 

This one is very peculiar, you would have thought that when it threw the
exception it would try to tell you which keywords was invalid.

The documented? test only checks for a result from object-documentation,
so you could you paste the backtrace from

(use-modules (ice-9 documentation))
(object-documentation extract)

You'll need to hit ,bt when you get the prompt. Cheers.

-- 
Ian Price -- shift-reset.com

"Programming is like pinball. The reward for doing it well is
the opportunity to do it again" - from "The Wizardy Compiled"




Information forwarded to bug-guile <at> gnu.org:
bug#15620; Package guile. (Thu, 24 Oct 2013 04:22:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #11 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ian Price <ianprice90 <at> googlemail.com>
To: "" <everfast <at> 126.com>
Cc: bug-guile <bug-guile <at> gnu.org>, guile-user <guile-user <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Re: guile 2.0.9 make check error, in bit-operations.test,
 elisp-compiler.test and eval-string.test
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 05:20:55 +0100
"" <everfast <at> 126.com> writes:

> Thanks, Ian.
>  
> For me compiling guile is just to satisfy a dependency of another
> software. I am really not 
> familiar with guile. 
>  
>>(use-modules (ice-9 documentation))
>>(object-documentation extract)
> Do you mean a file in the compiling-folder/module/ice-9? I have no
> idea which one will be. 
> All files in such folder are compressed and attached. Also attached is
> install script and logs.

I mean, run guile, and enter those two forms at the prompt, followed by
return. Since this is the code in the test that gives an error, you
should hopefully get an error here too. Then you can use the command ,bt
to get a backtrace.

-- 
Ian Price -- shift-reset.com

"Programming is like pinball. The reward for doing it well is
the opportunity to do it again" - from "The Wizardy Compiled"




Added tag(s) moreinfo. Request was from Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Wed, 01 Oct 2014 22:54:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Information forwarded to bug-guile <at> gnu.org:
bug#15620; Package guile. (Tue, 21 Jun 2016 11:26:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #16 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Andy Wingo <wingo <at> pobox.com>
To: "" <everfast <at> 126.com>
Cc: bug-guile <bug-guile <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Re: bug#15620: guile 2.0.9 make check error, in bit-operations.test,
 elisp-compiler.test and eval-string.test
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 13:24:58 +0200
Hi Frank,

Closing this one due to lack of information.  If you find a compile
failure with icc on Guile 2.0.11 or 2.1.3, please open a new report.
Thanks :)

Andy

On Thu 24 Oct 2013 06:20, Ian Price <ianprice90 <at> googlemail.com> writes:

> "" <everfast <at> 126.com> writes:
>
>> Thanks, Ian.
>>  
>> For me compiling guile is just to satisfy a dependency of another
>> software. I am really not 
>> familiar with guile. 
>>  
>>>(use-modules (ice-9 documentation))
>>>(object-documentation extract)
>> Do you mean a file in the compiling-folder/module/ice-9? I have no
>> idea which one will be. 
>> All files in such folder are compressed and attached. Also attached is
>> install script and logs.
>
> I mean, run guile, and enter those two forms at the prompt, followed by
> return. Since this is the code in the test that gives an error, you
> should hopefully get an error here too. Then you can use the command ,bt
> to get a backtrace.




Reply sent to Andy Wingo <wingo <at> pobox.com>:
You have taken responsibility. (Tue, 21 Jun 2016 11:52:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Notification sent to "" <everfast <at> 126.com>:
bug acknowledged by developer. (Tue, 21 Jun 2016 11:52:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #21 received at 15620-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Andy Wingo <wingo <at> pobox.com>
To: 15620-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#15620: guile 2.0.9 make check error, in bit-operations.test,
 elisp-compiler.test and eval-string.test
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 13:51:00 +0200
close
thanks

On Tue 21 Jun 2016 13:24, Andy Wingo <wingo <at> pobox.com> writes:

> Hi Frank,
>
> Closing this one due to lack of information.  If you find a compile
> failure with icc on Guile 2.0.11 or 2.1.3, please open a new report.
> Thanks :)
>
> Andy
>
> On Thu 24 Oct 2013 06:20, Ian Price <ianprice90 <at> googlemail.com> writes:
>
>> "" <everfast <at> 126.com> writes:
>>
>>> Thanks, Ian.
>>>  
>>> For me compiling guile is just to satisfy a dependency of another
>>> software. I am really not 
>>> familiar with guile. 
>>>  
>>>>(use-modules (ice-9 documentation))
>>>>(object-documentation extract)
>>> Do you mean a file in the compiling-folder/module/ice-9? I have no
>>> idea which one will be. 
>>> All files in such folder are compressed and attached. Also attached is
>>> install script and logs.
>>
>> I mean, run guile, and enter those two forms at the prompt, followed by
>> return. Since this is the code in the test that gives an error, you
>> should hopefully get an error here too. Then you can use the command ,bt
>> to get a backtrace.




bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Wed, 20 Jul 2016 11:24:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 8 years and 339 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.