Subject: Re: bug#15486: Should references to POSIX.2 in grep.1 be changed?

From: Jim Meyering <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 07:04:41 -0700

On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Glenn Golden <[email-masked]> wrote:
> --
> (This came up as a side issue when looking into details of bug #15483;
> it's not directly related, so filing as a separate report.)
>
> There's a FAQ put out by opengroup.org
>
>     http://www.opengroup.org/austin/papers/posix_faq.html
>
> which remarks (Q10) that "a POSIX.2 standard no longer exists".  Should
> grep.1 [2.14] (which refers to POSIX.2 in several places) be updated to refer
> instead to "the Shell and Utilties volume of POSIX.1-2008"? Or perhaps just
> "POSIX.1"?

close 15486
thanks

Actually, "POSIX" seems fine, now.
Thanks for the suggestion. I've made the switch with the attached patch:
From f00013c9d8d0545c61b1e990f4426675ec540dba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jim Meyering <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 10:22:57 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] gnulib: update to latest

---
 gnulib | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gnulib b/gnulib
index e485bba..fdd1b51 160000
--- a/gnulib
+++ b/gnulib
@@ -1 +1 @@
-Subproject commit e485bbab866c91f6bd67c4630e87634983055f97
+Subproject commit fdd1b511c5c12912aae79b58e0c5f6ffa0492d6e
-- 
1.8.4.299.gb3e7d24