GNU bug report logs - #15463
FTBFS c-stack under gcc 4.8 with --enable-gcc-warnings

Previous Next

Package: diffutils;

Reported by: Eric Blake <eblake <at> redhat.com>

Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 18:02:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Eric Blake <eblake <at> redhat.com>
Subject: bug#15463: closed (Re: [bug-diffutils] bug#15463: FTBFS c-stack
 under gcc 4.8 with --enable-gcc-warnings)
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 19:22:03 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report

#15463: FTBFS c-stack under gcc 4.8 with --enable-gcc-warnings

which was filed against the diffutils package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 15463 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
15463: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=15463
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>
To: Eric Blake <eblake <at> redhat.com>
Cc: 15463-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnulib <at> gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug-diffutils] bug#15463: FTBFS c-stack under gcc 4.8 with
 --enable-gcc-warnings
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 12:21:44 -0700
On 09/25/13 11:01, Eric Blake wrote:
> I don't know if this is a case of diffutils being too aggressive about
> the warnings it uses on gnulib files

Yes, that sounds good enough.  I pushed this into diffutils:

From 1d69c1591812101e2dffa64c45e2f1c3c901fadc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 12:20:00 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] build: omit -Wsuggest-attribute=pure for lib

* configure.ac (WARN_CFLAGS): Omit -Wsuggest-attribute=pure
when compiling the lib subdirectory.  Reported for Fedora 19
by Eric Blake in <http://bugs.gnu.org/15463>.
---
 configure.ac | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index 90bebc9..f7efcb1 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -123,6 +123,7 @@ if test "$gl_gcc_warnings" = yes; then
   nw="$nw -Wunused-macros"
   nw="$nw -Wmissing-prototypes"
   nw="$nw -Wold-style-definition"
+  nw="$nw -Wsuggest-attribute=pure"
   gl_MANYWARN_COMPLEMENT([GNULIB_WARN_CFLAGS], [$WARN_CFLAGS], [$nw])
   AC_SUBST([GNULIB_WARN_CFLAGS])
 fi
-- 
1.8.3.1



[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Eric Blake <eblake <at> redhat.com>
To: bug-diffutils <at> gnu.org, Bug-gnulib <bug-gnulib <at> gnu.org>
Subject: FTBFS c-stack under gcc 4.8 with --enable-gcc-warnings
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 12:01:01 -0600
[Message part 4 (text/plain, inline)]
I tried to build diffutils from git on my Fedora 19 machine:

$ gcc --version |head -n1
gcc (GCC) 4.8.1 20130603 (Red Hat 4.8.1-1)

It's dying inside of gnulib's c-stack:

  CC       c-stack.o
c-stack.c: In function 'segv_handler':
c-stack.c:163:12: error: function might be candidate for attribute
'pure' if it is known to return normally [-Werror=suggest-attribute=pure]
 static int segv_handler (void *address __attribute__ ((unused)),
            ^
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors

I don't know if this is a case of diffutils being too aggressive about
the warnings it uses on gnulib files (after all, at least coreutils
explicitly uses fewer warnings for gnulib files than for its own), or if
it is something we should be fixing in gnulib.

More interesting, the function is only pure if DEBUG was not enabled
during compilation, so if we do decide to fix it in gnulib, the fix has
to use the same condition on whether to apply the attribute.

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

This bug report was last modified 11 years and 239 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.