GNU bug report logs - #15459

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#15459: closed ()
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2014 05:36:01 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Sat, 29 Mar 2014 22:35:05 -0700
with message-id <5337AD09.7000708 <at> cs.ucla.edu>
and subject line Re:
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #15459,
regarding 
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
15459: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=15459
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: leila karami <karami.leila1 <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-diffutils <at> gnu.org
Subject: Re:
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 17:57:35 +0330

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

Excuseme. I attached wrong files in previous e-mail.

2-files is true.


On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 5:11 PM, leila karami <karami.leila1 <at> gmail.com>wrote:

> Dear all
>
> I obtained a file (containing both of number and text) from a program in
> linux.
>
> I did changes in my file by text editor in windows.
>
> I changed order of the some lines.
>
> for example, before change, the order of lines was as follows:
>
> 1
> 2
> 3
> 4
> 5
> .
> .
> .
> .
> 1000
>
> and now, after the change:
>
> 1
> 2
> 7
> 8
> 3
> .
> .
> .
> .
> 1000.
>
> When I use new file in the my program, I encountered with error (file
> format is changed and is not standard for program).
>
> But when I compared 2 files (old and new) by text editor in windows, I did
> not find difference.
>
> One of program developers suggested me to use unix diff tool.
>
>
> After using following command, diff tool did not give me output file or a
> text containing information about differences:
>
> *diff old.gr new.gro*
>
> I attached my files to this e-mail.
>
> Should I use diff by special option?
>
> How to fix this issue?
>
> Please guide me about that.
>
> Any help will highly appreciated.
>
> Best wishes for you.
>
>
>
>
>

[Message part 4 (text/html, inline)]

[2-files.rar (application/rar, attachment)]

[Message part 6 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>
To: 15459-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re:
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 22:35:05 -0700

After looking at all this thread:

http://bugs.gnu.org/15459

it appears that no bug has been reported against the upstream diffutils 
so I'm taking the liberty of closing this bug report.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.