Subject: Re: bug#15382: desktop restores buffers in wrong order

From: martin rudalics <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 08:45:45 +0200

> A question whether such non-existent buffers should be also
 > saved/restored is a separate question.  Maybe they should,
 > with some empty placeholder buffers if buffer content
 > can't be restored?

That's how it behaved initially using `get-buffer-create' IIRC.  But
then people complained ...

martin